Guest guest Posted May 17, 2003 Report Share Posted May 17, 2003 At 08:29 AM 5/17/03 -0000, Ed wrote: >Hi Therese!! >How can I say anything serious when you are talking about Pluto >between the thighs?? Richard started it!! However, the symbolism is very appropriate. I have a sky program that superimposes the old constellational figures over the stars. Edgar Cayce said that Pluto represented a consciousness that was only beginning to be felt--'a developing spiritual awareness.' With the sex scandal, this is certainly happening in the Catholic Church. I grew up in a Catholic family, and priests were regarded as practically Jesus himself. They were spoken of in hushed tones of respect. And the pope WAS God! I was not favorably regarded when my little 7 year old self stood in front of my mother and proclaimed, " I don't BELIEVE in the infallibility of the pope!! " Now Catholics are forced to say, " Priests and bishops are only human, after all, " and Catholics now have to look inside themselves for guidance in their lives. More spiritual awareness, yes! We're starting to move away from priests and ministers as the mouthpieces of God. I predict that the total collapse of the churches will happen during Pluto's transit of sidereal Sagittarius. >Still, some thoughts occur. These kinds of scandals have been >prevalent in the Catholic Church for years. The Jesuits are believed >to have about 45% of their population be gay men. A friend of mine who has a relative in the Catholic priesthood says that he said a HUGE percentage of seminary students are gay, maybe up to 50-60 percent. I think they might think that becoming a priest might cure them of homosexuality. Well, we've seen where that myth has gone. >I live in the very Catholic south side of Chicago, and this kind of >stuff has been going on for years. I wonder where the parents of the children were coming from if they realized what was going on with their children? >I think what happened last year >was that the depth of the conspiracy was finally exposed to the >public, and how far up the bishopric chain it went. Yes, Pluto....which brings what is hidden into the open. Cayce again: " Pluto and Vulcan are one and the same. " (826-8) Vulcan ruled volcanos, sudden eruptions from deep within the earth. In answering a client's question about the effects of Pluto conjunct the ascendant, the sleeping Cayce replied: " [The Pluto infuence] is gradually *growing,*...in the future affairs or developments of man towards the spiritual-minded influences... [These people} in the present...are merely becoming *aware* of same. Rather within the next hundred to two hundred years [Pluto's influence will be felt in the affairs of man.] " (1100-27) Which is to say that in the majority of cases in the present Pluto should probably not even be considered in the individual horoscope, and that includes synastry. I suspect that in almost every case Pluto is a mute note in the birth chart. Good to hear from you, Ed. A silent EdK is a 'not much is happening' list. I cannot understand why the regulars on this list don't discuss horoscopes. I think they used to in the early days of the list. (Reply to be continued in another post...) Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.