Guest guest Posted December 24, 1999 Report Share Posted December 24, 1999 At 11:37 AM 12/24/1999 -0000, you wrote: > Aumgn93 >Re: Mick? >Hello, everyone. > >In a message dated 99-12-23 22:33:56 EST, Breck writes: >> The changes wrought on my own chart if changed to Sidereal make some sense >> as do those of others I've considered. BUT using Sidereal would change >> Mick Jagger to a Cancer! I just can't fathom that... > >Could you share his birthdata with us so the rest of us can see the whole >chart? > +Kevin, be happy to. Many birth dates can be found at: http://www.thenewage.com/ms/ms_astro_search.html That site yielded the following info: Jagger, Mick 1943 07 26 Time: 06:30:00 AM GMT Place: Dartford, England (Long: 000E14'00, Lat: 51N27'00) Music, Rock " Rolling Stone " is considered a shrewd businessman I don't know what the reference to " Rolling Stone " is about. Jagger, Mick 1946 07 26 Place: Dartford, Kent, England Film, Actor/Actress, Music/Lyrics Since we have two birth dates, actually years, for Mick I will have to dig deeper. The 1943 date includes a time so that is interesting. Also it accords with the age I think he is (he is a contemporary of the Batles and they were all born in the early rather than middle 1940's. I realize that what you liwant to look at is the whole chart so that you can see whether a Leo or strong 5th house emphasis shows that would explain what Sidereally is a Sun in Cancer person. I'll get back on this with you all. Breck _+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.