Guest guest Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 Varun ji, plz try. I heard it at a meeting of prominent vedic astrologers. It was my instinct that told me that it could be helpful in 35 saala system. Unfortunately as i am not well versed in mathematical vedic astrology, i was a passive participant and assumed that it would be a common knowledge thing. I will try to contact them again. I have trust in ur resources also. Thanks - kulbir On 1/22/09, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: > Dear Kulbir bhai, > > I am not aware of the process through which 300 year dasha system was > worked out. As a matter of fact I am hearing it for the first time > from you. At least I have not come across any reference to 300 year > dasha system in the Vedic astrology texts I have read. > > However I would try to find out if such a procedure ever existed. > > With respect and regards, > > Varun Trivedi > > > , kulbir bance > <kulbirbance wrote: >> >> Varun ji; >> kindly let me know what was the original method which calculated > dasha for >> 300 yeras and parashari system rectified it to be taken from > position from >> moon to shorten the span. >> i simply don't know what the earlier method was; only heard about > it. >> may be the anwser could explain certain things about 35 saala > chakkar >> because it does the same i.e. shortens the span of period governed > by >> particular ruling planets. >> i am damn serious;plz share any information about the same. i am not >> questioning your knowledge but simply looking for an answer. >> regards >> kulbir >> >> >> On 1/22/09, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote: >> > >> > Dear Kulbir bhai, >> > >> > Yes it is true that the 35 sala dasha cycle of the Lal Kitab can >> > start with any planet. >> > >> > In the example table [ page 93; 1940 urdu ed ] the dasha is worked >> > out on the basis of a prominent event in the life of the native. > The >> > event is the first marriage of the native. Since the native got >> > married in the 17th year, hence it is assumed that his Venus > dasha or >> > shukra ka daura started at the 17th year. The rest of the table , >> > both for years prior to the 17th and after the 17th have been > filled >> > accordingly. >> > >> > Since the example table above is for a native whose birth details >> > were not known and therefore the help of a major event in the life >> > had to be taken to ascertain the 35 sala dasha cycle. But in the >> > cases where the birth details of the native are available then > the 35 >> > sala dasha cycle has to be worked out mathematically and logically >> > through the same method which is applied to derive the Vinshottari >> > dasha. >> > >> > How the 35 sala dasha cycle is worked out has been explained in an >> > article already uploaded in the files in the folder articles on LK >> > grammar. >> > >> > In a couple of days Pt. Bhooshan Priya ji will be posting another >> > artcle on the 35 sala dasha cycle as you had already requested > him to >> > do. >> > >> > Have a nice day >> > >> > Varun Trivedi >> > >> > <% > 40>, >> > kulbir bance >> > <kulbirbance@> wrote: >> > > >> > > Varun ji, >> > > >> > > Then it means that the daura can start from any point like >> > > vimshotri. So ANTARDASHA cannot be left untouched. I am told > that >> > > prashari jyotish evolved the concept by starting from position > of >> > > moon. Bcoz by the other method age span ran into 300 yrs. What > was >> > > that or the original method. >> > > >> > > Regards. >> > > >> > > Kulbir >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 1/22/09, varun_trvd <varun_trvd@> wrote: >> > > > Dear Kulbir Bhai, >> > > > >> > > > There is no mistake even in the original. The rahu period > will be >> > > > from 1 to 4 only. >> > > > >> > > > The example table is for a native who started his venus dasha > at >> > the >> > > > age of 17 years. Therefore under the column for Venus the > years >> > 17 - >> > > > 19 are to be written. >> > > > >> > > > From the venus column go backwards. the 16th year will be of > moon, >> > > > then two years of the sun will be 14th and the 15th... and so > on. >> > > > When you come to the rahu column it will be only four years > left >> > and >> > > > hence 1 to 4 will be of rahu. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Varun Trivedi >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > --- In > <% > 40>, >> > kulbir bance >> > > > <kulbirbance@> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Varun ji, >> > > >> >> > > >> then the original has a mistake it should be from 0 to 5. >> > > >> The header mentions 6 years ,correrponding column under it > has >> > 34 to >> > > >> 39. Why publish it incorrect in the transliteration. Do the >> > mistakes >> > > >> have some sanctity too. >> > > >> >> > > >> Regards. >> > > >> >> > > >> Kulbir >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On 1/21/09, varun_trvd <varun_trvd@> wrote: >> > > >> > Dear Kulbir bhai, >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I have checked with the original urdu edition. The table on >> > page >> > > > 93 of >> > > >> > the 1940 urdu edition reads 1 ta 4 for rahu column. > Therefore >> > the >> > > >> > transliteration is correct. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Regards, >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Varun Trivedi >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > --- In > <% > 40>, >> > kulbir bance >> > > >> > <kulbirbance@> wrote: >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Plz note the table printed upon page 93 of goswami ji's >> > > > transliterated >> > > >> >> book 1940 armaan is totally wrong. In The very first > column >> > The >> > > > span >> > > >> >> of rahu should have been 1 to 5 and not 4. Hereon the > whole >> > > > table goes >> > > >> >> incorrect. Kulbir >> > > >> >> >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.