RE: Digest Number 656

[Guest guest]

______________________

______________________

 

Message: 2

Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:20:38 -0800

Therese Hamilton <eastwest

Overlapping signs

 

At 04:09 PM 11/20/03 -0800, Dark*Star wrote:

>It is Taurean to hold on to an idea resisting change.

 

 

Anny: That is right. I know sidereal Taurus people who are

hard to change in mind and habits. Even against their

convenience. Sometimes I say to them " : I understand: you have

in mind " why doing it easy, if it is possible to do it in the

difficult way. "

 

I often have written, that it is sufficient to change the

zodiac. The basic knowledge of astrology we learned is bound

to the sidereal zodiac.That is why work with the sidereal

zodiac is so gratifying, so easy to understand. The tropical

zodiac is just fiction. The most arguments against the sidereal

zodiac is, that tropicalists do not accept the reality of their

sidereal chart. Saturn in Capricornus for instance might have a

splendid occupation, but when this changes into Sagitarius, with

a square to the Ascendant, the source of gall-bladder problems

and skinproblems is easy to recognize, in early youth.

A former friend's sun is in tropical Aries.It is impossible

for him to part from his Sun in Aries. He reacts indeed as an

Aries, because the sidereal Venus, Mercury, Mars and Uranus all

occupy the sign Aries. And the Pisces Sun creates lightblue eys

and he is more or less mediumistic: sun. Naturally the whole

chart is speaking for a native. It is marvelous to see it all.

Elisabeth is right in her observation of her surrounding

people. I bet she enjoys astrology a great deal more than ever.

The socalled " Christian Astrology " of Allan Leo is a misconception.

Once I read the foolish argument that the tropical zodiac is the

intellectual zodiac and the sidereal zodiac ??? I have forgotten.

Foolish arguments I forget easily.

 

I don't think so, not in the sidereal zodiac.

 

>We are all composites if our planets straddle sign and constellation

...........

Anny:Who is telling this does not reckon with the secondair

progressions.

That is why people recognize wonderwell anything about themselves,

but it is a very small part of themselves, comparing to a sidereal

chart, is my experience.

 

You highlighted a pet peeve of mine: The sidereal signs aren't

constellations..........

 

Anny: Indeed signs, but constellations are a group of planetes

who share the conjunction of a planetpicture; the socalled

midpoints. It is the easiest way to explain. It is worth the

time to prove the value of these midpoints.

 

 

______________________

_

(2) Anyone who has this book (book II): What is your opinion of it? Stahl

gives a very clear explanation of what Fagan had to say about Libra,

sunrise and the east.

 

 

Anny: Yes I have one. A Dutch astrologer, who was acquainted with

Carl Stahl sold his sidereal book to me. He is not living anymore.