Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Astrolog?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

, " Chris Mitchell "

<chrismitchell@z...> wrote:

> I wondered if anyone uses Astrolog here - the free astrology

program. I've

> been using it for ages for tropical astrology, and it does sidereal

charts

> too very easily (and you can define what Ayanamsa to use), but I'm

not sure

> if doing a sidereal solar return is simply a case of making sure

that the

> Sun is in the same sidereal position as it was when I was born -

presumably,

> the whole point of sidereal is that I don't need to take precession

into

> account?

----------

Chris,

Your definition of an SSR is just fine.

 

>

> If anyone has software that does SSRs easily, could you possibly

check

> something out for me, please?

>

> My birth data is: 15 March 1960, 15:25GMT, Windsor, England - 0W35,

51N28.

> My natal Sun is 0Pis52'26 " (sidereal) and Ascendant is 3Leo25.

>

> If I do what I think is a SSR for 1996, I get an Ascendant of

2Lib19, and a

> Moon of 13Cap02.

------------

Calculations from CCRS for the given Lat & Long give SSR 1996 15

March 1996 @ 21:01:28 UT; Moon 13 Cap 02' 13 " ASC 2 Lib 24' 23 " .

 

Calculating the same with Solar Fire 5 pulls up slightly different

Lat & Long from the ACS Atlas (51N29 0W38) UT 21:01:02 Moon 13 Cap

02'00 " ASC 2 Lib 18.

 

Don't know *exactly* why the differences. Could be internal workings

or use of different ephemerides. CCRS uses JPL.

---------

> Does this sound right? And as a side note, what houses systems do

you tend

> to use?

--------

That's a real can of worms. I use Campanus; I like the division of

the Prime Vertical in spatial terms.

 

Sidereally yours,

Matthew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:29 PM ,

mquellas wrote:

 

 

> Chris,

> Your definition of an SSR is just fine.

>

> ------------

> Calculations from CCRS for the given Lat & Long give SSR 1996 15

> March 1996 @ 21:01:28 UT; Moon 13 Cap 02' 13 " ASC 2 Lib 24' 23 " .

>

> Calculating the same with Solar Fire 5 pulls up slightly different

> Lat & Long from the ACS Atlas (51N29 0W38) UT 21:01:02 Moon 13 Cap

> 02'00 " ASC 2 Lib 18.

>

> Don't know *exactly* why the differences. Could be internal workings

> or use of different ephemerides. CCRS uses JPL.

> --------

> That's a real can of worms. I use Campanus; I like the division of

> the Prime Vertical in spatial terms.

>

> Sidereally yours,

> Matthew

>

 

Matthew - you're a star! Many thanks for checking this out for me - I can

use SSRs with a bit more confidence now :)

 

Chris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " Chris Mitchell " <chrismitchell@z...>

wrote:

>>>I wondered if anyone uses Astrolog here - the free astrology program. I've

been using it for ages for tropical astrology, and it does sidereal charts too

very easily (and you can define what Ayanamsa to use), but I'm not sure if doing

a sidereal solar return is simply a case of making sure that the Sun is in the

same sidereal position as it was when I was born - presumably, the whole point

of sidereal is that I don't need to take precession into account?

 

If anyone has software that does SSRs easily, could you possibly check something

out for me, please?<<<

 

- That is the correct way to find the solar return. Same applies for the lunar

return, of course.

 

I used Astrolog for about a year for sidereal astrology, but it really is a pain

in the behind to calculate returns with, and progressions are even more of a

pain. It is at heart a tropical astrology program with a sidereal 'option'. I

eventually wrote a program, Aldebaran, to do all of this stuff for me

automagically, and unlike Astrolog, it is made specifically for sidereal

astrology and techniques. Its major shortcoming compared to Astrolog is a lack

of pretty graphics, which I don't have time to program, but it -is- free.

(Nobody should have to pay for what amounts to a calculator.)

 

http://wealthandpower.org/aldebaran/

 

 

> My birth data is: 15 March 1960, 15:25GMT, Windsor, England - 0W35, 51N28.

> My natal Sun is 0Pis52'26 " (sidereal) and Ascendant is 3Leo25.

>

> If I do what I think is a SSR for 1996, I get an Ascendant of 2Lib19, and a

> Moon of 13Cap02.

>

> Does this sound right? And as a side note, what houses systems do you tend

> to use?

 

Yup. Aldebaran reports 02Lib24'23 " for the AC, and 13Cap02'12 " for the Moon.

 

I personally don't use a house system, because I don't see what basis in reality

they have. Jyotish uses the full-house system, where the houses are exactly

aligned with the signs; I'd use that, if any.

 

> Thanks in advance!

>

> Chris.

 

 

Jesse Milligan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Jesse -

 

I've downloaded the program, and it looks very useful :)

 

Chris.

 

 

On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:14 PM ,

Zorak wrote:

 

> , " Chris Mitchell "

> <chrismitchell@z...> wrote:

>>>> I wondered if anyone uses Astrolog here - the free astrology

>>>> program. I've been using it for ages for tropical astrology, and

>>>> it does sidereal charts too very easily (and you can define what

>>>> Ayanamsa to use), but I'm not sure if doing a sidereal solar

>>>> return is simply a case of making sure that the Sun is in the same

>>>> sidereal position as it was when I was born - presumably, the

>>>> whole point of sidereal is that I don't need to take precession

>>>> into account?

>

> If anyone has software that does SSRs easily, could you possibly

> check something out for me, please?<<<

>

> - That is the correct way to find the solar return. Same applies for

> the lunar return, of course.

>

> I used Astrolog for about a year for sidereal astrology, but it

> really is a pain in the behind to calculate returns with, and

> progressions are even more of a pain. It is at heart a tropical

> astrology program with a sidereal 'option'. I eventually wrote a

> program, Aldebaran, to do all of this stuff for me automagically, and

> unlike Astrolog, it is made specifically for sidereal astrology and

> techniques. Its major shortcoming compared to Astrolog is a lack of

> pretty graphics, which I don't have time to program, but it -is-

> free. (Nobody should have to pay for what amounts to a calculator.)

>

> http://wealthandpower.org/aldebaran/

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me ,I am a long time lurker , a complete beginner . I have a

colleague who is heavily into sidereal astrology and they worked out my

chart for me ( 10.11.54 08.30 London UK ) They tell me that I am Libra with

Libra rising and Moon in Aries . However, up until a couple of months ago I

believed , mistakenly , that my time of birth was 06.15 ; using this data an

online sidereal astrologer , a couple of years ago , still came up with a

Libra asc . As I said a complete beginner , but I read some books and did a

short course where I was taught that the asc moves every couple of hours -

that being so would not my revised asc be Scorpio . If any of you well

versed people could give me some advice on this I would be eternally

grateful !

Bestest . Jen.

 

_____

 

Zorak [apocalocust]

27 January 2004 22:14

 

Re: Astrolog?

 

 

, " Chris Mitchell "

<chrismitchell@z...> wrote:

>>>I wondered if anyone uses Astrolog here - the free astrology program.

I've been using it for ages for tropical astrology, and it does sidereal

charts too very easily (and you can define what Ayanamsa to use), but I'm

not sure if doing a sidereal solar return is simply a case of making sure

that the Sun is in the same sidereal position as it was when I was born -

presumably, the whole point of sidereal is that I don't need to take

precession into account?

 

If anyone has software that does SSRs easily, could you possibly check

something out for me, please?<<<

 

- That is the correct way to find the solar return. Same applies for the

lunar return, of course.

 

I used Astrolog for about a year for sidereal astrology, but it really is a

pain in the behind to calculate returns with, and progressions are even more

of a pain. It is at heart a tropical astrology program with a sidereal

'option'. I eventually wrote a program, Aldebaran, to do all of this stuff

for me automagically, and unlike Astrolog, it is made specifically for

sidereal astrology and techniques. Its major shortcoming compared to

Astrolog is a lack of pretty graphics, which I don't have time to program,

but it -is- free. (Nobody should have to pay for what amounts to a

calculator.)

 

http://wealthandpower.org/aldebaran/

 

 

> My birth data is: 15 March 1960, 15:25GMT, Windsor, England - 0W35, 51N28.

> My natal Sun is 0Pis52'26 " (sidereal) and Ascendant is 3Leo25.

>

> If I do what I think is a SSR for 1996, I get an Ascendant of 2Lib19, and

a

> Moon of 13Cap02.

>

> Does this sound right? And as a side note, what houses systems do you tend

> to use?

 

Yup. Aldebaran reports 02Lib24'23 " for the AC, and 13Cap02'12 " for the

Moon.

 

I personally don't use a house system, because I don't see what basis in

reality they have. Jyotish uses the full-house system, where the houses are

exactly aligned with the signs; I'd use that, if any.

 

> Thanks in advance!

>

> Chris.

 

 

Jesse Milligan

 

 

 

 

" How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " -----

 

Post message:

Subscribe: -

Un: -

List owner: -owner

 

Shortcut URL to this page:

/

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 04:18 PM 1/28/04 -0000, Jan wrote:

>Forgive me ,I am a long time lurker , a complete beginner . I have a

>colleague who is heavily into sidereal astrology and they worked out my

>chart for me ( 10.11.54 08.30 London UK )

 

Hello Jen,

 

We don't know if this is October 11 or November 10. (You answered this in

another post--Nov 10) But it's a reminder for everyone to please spell out

the month when posting birth data. In the U.K. it's day-month-year. In the

U.S. it's customary to write month-day-year.

 

Therese

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...