Rainfall Records

[Guest guest]

At 10:41 AM 2/13/04 -0000, Matthew wrote:

>Therese,

>

>Thanks for posting the URL for the San Francisco Rainfall. Nice

>format. Of course, I'm blind now from about 8 point type. Interesting

>CapLunars, especially for 1975-76, whern rainfall was FAR below

>normal. Check out the CapLunars for four months following 12/5/1975,

>the usually wet months.

 

Matthew,

 

I'm looking forward to checking out these charts after Solar Fire arrives

and is installed. Not sure how I'll do without a printed manual...it's due

around the end of the month. I'm an old fashioned manual reader.

 

I printed out the SF rainfall pages--31 pages. I can't see the figures very

well on my small notebook screen. The pages print out in a standard larger

font.

 

What process do you go through to post SF charts in the Files section? Do

you save your charts to some kind of file that uploads easily?

 

Matthew, I did want to say that just because I don't use various techniques

or cyclic charts doesn't mean that I don't think they're valid. Mainly I

don't have much experience with some of the western techniques--not since

the early 80s or so. I've often considered that mundane charts are those

that should be used for events that happen in specific locales. I've never

checked those charts since I've been using Jyotish software for 20 years.

 

>Found another site that has precipitation records, daily, since

>around 1994 for weather stations all over California;

>www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/WEATHER/wxretrieval.html

 

Thanks for the link. It looks like the good rainfall data is posted by the

universities. U.C. Davis--I really like Davis, and would live there if it

wasn't so hot in summer.

 

I reviewed the 9-11 charts you posted a while ago. Very convincing.

 

Therese