Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

(No subject)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

dear ravinder,

though i m not seniur, still let me share view

 

some classical texts hints on qualities of astrologer,and one of

them is he shud be well versed in varius branches of astrology

 

different branches act as a bac test or verification for prediction

we offer, but some where we shud stop adding new stuff and admit our

ineffeciency with postiveness.

 

there are few donts and do when u synchronize varius branch which

are understood only by practice or true guidence.

 

any astrological analysis requires natal, transit and dasha analysis.

there can not be any compromize on this how ever u can choose there

after which leaves u in comfor zone and high accrecy level.

 

natal is divided into parashari jaimini kp ( infact there is no

much difference among them)

 

transist is divided into astakvarga and tajik, chakra intepretition.

dasha divided into naxtra dasha and rashi dasha again sub divided

into many levels

 

transist can be well predicted either with astakvarga or

prsashatastakvarga if importence is given to sodhya pind and trikona

reductions, and fine tuning can be drwan from anual chart consedring

varius sahma and shamesh along with muntha. here u may not need

depth analysis of all tajik yoga like ithalsa, kamboola, musarfira

etc how ver they are most useful in prashna or horary.

 

there are varius chakras for transist intepretition also like kotta

chakra a sarvatobhadra chakra durbanka chakra, etc they may be

utelized well in muhurta than in natal charts or birth horoscope.

 

if these are used then anual chart has to be avoided.

 

prashna can be more presise if omens and tajik yoga are consedered.

lagna can be chara, moon also may be in chara, 11th lord or karyesh

may be in lagna but if there is cancellation of tajik yoga, question

may fail inspite of these sure combinations.

 

 

 

nadi analysis may be based on any of this or a mixture of all.

bhrigu samhita is based on natal analysis where as meena nadi

highlight dasha intepretion, bhrigu nandi nadi is incorported with

transist results. so we can choose nadi analysis based on our

workabilty or area of concernity as a extention.

 

but what ever system we use, we shud stick to that and not change

bcoz other sytem is easy or gives quick results

 

finaly i conclude with astrology can be well practised if natal

astrology is given 50% marking which deals with planets in sign,

thier strength , shadbala and vimshopak bala.

 

transist 15% marking which deals with astakvarga or anual horoscopy

 

dasha 15% marking which invoves fine tuning

 

10% for prashna to find out any karma causing troubles, of presnt

birth and remedifying imediately for quick results,

 

10% left for further resarch may be nadi or any micronization.

 

with regards and thanx

ramesh

 

 

, Ravinder Grover <astrology

wrote:

>

> 8th April 2006

>

> Dear brothers and sisters

>

> I had a unique case on 29th March 2006. I tried to answer to

the question through KP, Parashara, Nadi, Bhrigu Nadi and

recommended some remedies.

>

> I wish if senior astrologers can guide me if I am wrong in my

approach.

>

> Thanks

>

> Ravinder Grover

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...