Guest guest Posted January 19, 2000 Report Share Posted January 19, 2000 In this article you say that Libra is outgoing. I practice jyotish and in that there are aspects called nakshastras and these have their own meanings. Anyway with the sidereal chart Picasso's sun is in the nakshastra " Swati " which is small segment of Libra that actually causes a tendency to be a hermit. Just thought I'd throw that in. donna > Message: 1 > Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:21:09 EST > Aumgn93 > Re: Picasso analysed > > Hi, Breck! > > In a message dated 00-01-16 18:58:05 EST, you write: > > >>1) Why couldn't Picasso have been a Libra? He > was an artist, > >> and Venus, the planet of the arts, rules Libra. > > > > +He couldn't have been a Libra because he was > such a Scorpio! He was > > (in)famous for his intensity, sexual nature, the > sexual orientation of much > > of his art, occupation with Death, domineering > character, appearance, and > > great wealth (Pluto=riches). > > Small bones of contentions here: > > 1) Anyone, regardless of sun sign, will act > Scorpioid in at least some ways > if their Pluto is strong enough. > > I'm reminded here of " televangelist " John > Ankerberg's " experiment " that was > intended to " debunk " astrology. They went and got > the birthdates of several > symphony orchestra members and discovered -- > ta-daaaaa! -- that the birthdays > were randomly fairly evenly distributed among the > signs. Well, whoopdee doo, > you and I and everyone else who knows about > angularity, aspects, & aspects to > midpoints could have told them that's what they'd > find. What I'd like to > know is where do the Sun (ego), Venus (art) and > Uranus (foreground Uranus = > need for an audience) tend to show up in their > charts? Let's not make the > mistake astrology's critics make by placing too much > emphasis on the Sun Sign. > > 2) Jupiter, not Pluto, is the planet of riches. > > > You asked if I had ever done returns, either > lunar or solar. Answer: yes I > > have done solar returns for myself; used to do > them every year on my > > birthday. Never got beans out of them. So > maybe... > > Neither did anyone else. Cyril Fagan was trying to > fix that problem when he > decided to try correcting for precession. Then, > suddenly, he found they > worked. > > This is why all those books coming out about > tropical solar returns put me > off -- they don't insist on correcting for > precession. > > > With the 11:15 p.m. birth time for Picasso, > > Did you remember to convert local mean time to > Greenwich Mean Time? Since > Picasso was born _west_ of 0* longitude, you have to > _add_ 4 minutes for > every degree, giving Picasso a birthtime of 11:32pm > GMT. (God, I HATE " local > mean time " <g>) > > > which is also used by the > > Circle Book of Charts, one comes up with a > Tropical ascendent of Leo 5d42m, > > which converted to Sidereal would render a Cancer > rising. Sun in Scorpio > > at 2d42m would be moved to Libra but still be in > the Fourth House near the > > Nadir. > > Yes, you did; that's what I got, too. > > > The Moon (ahem) would be moved back into Scorpio > :-) in the Fifth > > (which isn't too shabby), and is conjunct the > Dragon's Head. The Taurus > > stellium (Tropical) involving Saturn, Neptune, > Jupiter and Pluto (!) in the > > Tenth House, would be split Sidereally, with > Saturn and Neptune in Aries > > but with Jupiter and Pluto remaining in Taurus. > Still it IS a close > > conjunction betw. Jupiter and Pluto and that > certainly lends a Scorpionic > > curve to things. Interestingly IMHO the Second > and Eighth Houses, as > > indicators of wealth, are relatively unemphasized > with only quixotic Uranus > > tenanting the Second. Yet Picasso was one of the > wealthiest men of his > > time in Europe and certainly the wealthiest > Artist ever. > > Don't forget that the Moon's Northern Node, which > the Moon conjuncts, forms a > " yod " to the Mars-Saturn Sextile, too. Interesting. > . . > > > Still it is odd to see a Libran so non-social. > Libra, to my way of > > thinking, is the quintessential Sign of Wanting > to Belong and wanting to > > show that it can cooperate. And yet Picasso was > not very sociable for most > > of his life. Perhaps we don't do as well with > the challenge presented by > > our Sun's Sign (i.e. our dharma) as we like to > think! Picasso's challenge > > was to be a Libra but he blew it. He acted much > more the Water Sign > > Cancerian rising with Moon in secretive Scorpio. > > I'm sure that having such an angular Saturn caused a > lot of problems in that > area, too. Foreground Saturn can cause shyness. > > > Now Kevin, tell me more about how to do Sidereal > Solar Returns!!! > > There's several ways to do them, using either the > location where the person > will be at the time of the return or the location > where they'll be for most > of the year (some people like to go to the " best > location, " and then go home, > but it turns out not to work that way). > > 1) All decent software has a Sidereal Zodiac > option. (You can get what I > use at www.halloran.com.) Do your Sidereal Birth > Chart, and then, if your > software lets you (mine does), use it for Solar and > Lunar returns using the > Sidereal Zodiac option. > > 2) If the person in question was born in or after > 1976 (I've been meeting > more of them lately), or if the year in question is > 1976 or later, and you > don't have sidereal option software, ACS has > Sidereal ephemerides for > 1976-2000 and 2001-2050. Do their chart (use them > like any other ephemeris), > and, for luminary returns, use them to determine the > day and time (on or > around the birthday) the sun returns to the natal > longitude. It's a form of > " engineering backwards " -- instead of using the time > to find the longitude, > === message truncated === Talk to your friends online with Messenger. http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.