Guest guest Posted July 12, 2004 Report Share Posted July 12, 2004 At 12:07 AM 7/12/04 -0700, dezember wrote: > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " It means if you look at the sky in the Tropical zodiac, Pluto is within the boundaries of the sign of Sagittarius. But Pluto was close in the sky to Antares, the bright red star in the Scorpion. In the sidereal zodiac Pluto has been in the sign of Scorpio for many years. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2004 Report Share Posted July 12, 2004 So why not sidereal is right but tropical? are people who do tropical wrong? Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: At 12:07 AM 7/12/04 -0700, dezember wrote: > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " It means if you look at the sky in the Tropical zodiac, Pluto is within the boundaries of the sign of Sagittarius. But Pluto was close in the sky to Antares, the bright red star in the Scorpion. In the sidereal zodiac Pluto has been in the sign of Scorpio for many years. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2004 Report Share Posted July 12, 2004 Vci, here is one astrologers response, I was a tropical astrologer for over 20 years when I saw the results of a sidereal model. Tropical is a wonderful personality model, but sidereal offers something deeper and a more accurate picture. Remember, about 1800 years ago the sign ARies and the constellation were the same. THere was something called the dark and middle ages where calculations were lost, but astrology lingered. Tropical astrology has really become strong in the last 100 years, primarily due to Carl Jung and many psychologists who foung gret meaning in the signs and began to identifyl qualities of such in a psychological manner. Typically, the tropical astrologer looks out inot the heaves for more and more aspects and asteroids, in my experiece, the sidereal astrologer looks down deeper. Vci . [dezember1480] Monday, July 12, 2004 1:56 PM Re: Re: Antares/Sagittarius So why not sidereal is right but tropical? are people who do tropical wrong? Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: At 12:07 AM 7/12/04 -0700, dezember wrote: > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " It means if you look at the sky in the Tropical zodiac, Pluto is within the boundaries of the sign of Sagittarius. But Pluto was close in the sky to Antares, the bright red star in the Scorpion. In the sidereal zodiac Pluto has been in the sign of Scorpio for many years. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2004 Report Share Posted July 13, 2004 At 11:56 AM 7/12/04 -0700, Vci wrote: >So why not sidereal is right but tropical? >are people who do tropical wrong? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dedicated siderealists believe so, yes. This claim is supported by solar and luanr returns, which occur at different times than Tropical returns, and show events more clearly. Some siderealists will claim that there is no Tropical zodiac. The so-called traits of the Tropoical signs are a bleed through from the sidereal. I tend to hold this view. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.