Guest guest Posted November 17, 2003 Report Share Posted November 17, 2003 Hi All, Therese wrote........: But Fagan rejected the concept of male and female signs. I think he was wrong. The zodiac is a series of rising and falling waves and these waves have their own characteristics............ Anny:I am aurprised! Mr Fagan probably never practiced the horary/request chart. Then all these special details are necessary observing such a chart. A wonderful mode to solve a certain problem. I know a lady astrologer, who is a specialist in such " request chart " . Tropical astrologer she indeed only studied the planets. I did not know about the sidereal zodiac at the time. Once she solved a problem for me; my bath tub leaked again after my husband solved the problem. Neptune, she told me, in the request chart was afflicting a planet in my purchase-chart of the house, was the problem. After reparation the plumber shew me the pipe; indeed wholly porous/damaged. Quite a big job to break away the tub again. Now and then I try it myself. and once I saw that my sidereal chart gave a exact better answer to an artist/painter for the future. In answer to..........The Sun or Moon in the 10th seemed to be more important than the signs they were in. Maybe the signs just helped to describe their professional fields. Indeed my brother was extremely succesful with his sun in X in Virgo: a doctor radiologer, as well a good photographer first. (There's a lot to investigate here. Then again, the Moon is receptive, so it may be overshadowed by any planets in conjunction, and maybe aspects as well. Therese)........... Yes I do agree very much. ______________________ ______________________ Message: 2 Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:16:08 -0800 Therese Hamilton <eastwest Re: The equality of signs At 04:36 PM 11/9/03 -0500, Elizabeth wrote: >...I think most people can agree that Aquarius is >viewed as a " good " or " cool " sign. Maybe it's >because it is suppose to represent creativity, >originality, the breaking of boundaries, and > " being unique " -- all of which are very >fashionable in the present time we are living in. >But I find at least the " being unique " part kind >of wrong because Aquarius is opposite of Leo, >which is supposed to be an individualistic " ego " >related sign. Indeed it is, one of my brothers was an Aquarius. His sun however stood in the eight house of the He was a psychiatrist in a very original way. He refused to prescribe drugs to his patients. The VIIIth house of Scorpio urges to do much study/research research. His Ascendant was Gemini: he wrote during his life very much in Medical issues. So you see that signs are quite practical in delineation. Tropical astrologers also call Aquarius the group sign.... (Indeed Bin Laden has several planets in the eigth house in Aquarius.... Airsign so he created a whole Netwerk. The study of the whole chart is necessary. Saturn in aspect to Uranus is influental; Saturn conjunct the Ascendant sometimes tends to pessimism. The sign again is of influence because Saturn in Aquarius is different from Saturn in Libra is my experience sofar. It depends on the aspects in the chart. ........On the other hand, she's sort of a loner and isn't comfortable in groups. This would be Saturn too. So possibly Aquarius/Capricorn isn't really into groups. It's simply a democrat, wanting everyone to be equal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2003 Report Share Posted November 17, 2003 At 12:42 AM 11/17/03 +0100, Anny wrote: >...one of my brothers was an Aquarian. >His sun however stood in the eight house of the >He was a psychiatrist in a very original way. >He refused to prescribe drugs to his patients. >The VIIIth house of Scorpio urges to do much >study/research research. His Ascendant was >Gemini: he wrote during his life very much >in Medical issues. So you see that signs are >quite practical in delineation. Anny, I think this may be the main value of signs: Their PRACTICAL delineation in relation to activities. What " I want " or " I think I need " belongs to the planets and not to the signs. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.