Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 Dear Therese I could not agree with you more! Would you share a bit about how you see sexuality in the navamsa??? I use G's insights a lot and find them to be very accurate c Therese Hamilton [eastwest] Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:53 PM RE: to prove or not to prove... Hi Cynthia, I'm not really into 'proving' astrology. I believe it's helpful to 'demonstrate' that certain astrological patterns tend to describe certain behavior patterns or events. It's fairly easy, or example, to see a tendency toward gay sexuality in the navamsa chart. It's also possible to see a tendency toward a long term monogomous relationship. It's possible to point out certain patterns (planetary relationships) for various types of careers. That sort of thing. The Gauquelins did help to isolate certain traits for the planets. Scientifically this doesn't 'prove' astrology. But it sure is helpful to know which traits go with Mars or which traits go with Saturn. Astrologers tended to miss on some of these before Gauquelin. Blessings, Therees At 11:08 AM 10/14/04 -0500, you wrote: > >Dear Therese and all > >The tricky word in the statement is " prove. " In astrology, we take a group >of charts and make inferences from those we have experienced. They are >often jaw-dropping dead on. Science uses the word " prove " in a different >way. > >My sweetie of 9 years is a statistics professor. He told me what it would >take to do a " valid " survey to study astrology. decided that what I saw >working was good enough for me. I gave up trying to " prove " astrology and >am happily content to infer based upon the data. I've been a full time >astrologer for years... " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 kyuseiki wrote: > , Therese Hamilton ><eastwest@s...> wrote: > > > >>Andrew, I haven't been able to get this link yet. I'll keep >> >> >trying--it must > > >>be our overly busy little server here in the mountians. >> >> > >It might be your server. But check out this link for related articles: > >http://www.astrozero.co.uk/ > >I have not read the book but the Phillipson site has a lot of info on it. > >Cheers, > >Andrew > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > >Shortcut URL to this page: >/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.