Guest guest Posted December 27, 2002 Report Share Posted December 27, 2002 At 08:39 AM 12/23/02 -0000, Ed K wrote: > , Terese Hamilton ><eastwest@s...> wrote: > >> I wish several of us could work together on research. > >Me too. Mundane stuff seems best for this. I believe that mundane astrology is a whole different animal, and probably the only tool that really works is the western sidereal mundoscope. I used to use that chart somewhat, and even published an article or two on its use in AMERICAN ASTROLOGY. But its use has receded into the past of my bad memory. I'm much more interested in people (having a background in psychology). >Here's one that is bothering me. I saw a story about this on the TV >tonite, and it seemed like it was important. Its a well-timed event >chart for a huge catastrophe in Canada -- the biggest explosion until >the atom bomb in 1945: > >http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/kylet1/halifax.htm > >Chart is Dec 6, 1917, 9:05 (maybe a minute earlier?) AST (+4:00), >Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 44N39 63W36. Should get 2 Cap rising. This chart is a very good example of why I don't think natal techniques work for mundane events. Where are our specialists in sidereal western astrology and the mundoscope?? I hope some of you speak up about this chart. I suspect parans and fixed stars will be very important in clearly showing the event. Wouldn't hurt to compare the mundoscopes for other explosions too. Terese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.