Charts for San Francisco

[Guest guest]

At 10:22 AM 5/20/04 -0700, Steve wrote:

>

>Dietmar wrote:

>

>> I don't have the L.A. chart but the San Fran. chart for that March

>> 21, 2005 date has a lot of things going on - t.N.Node conjoining

>> n.ME, t.MA square n.PL, t.SA® coming to conj. with n.MA, t.JU

>> square n.MA and opp. n.SA, t.NE quincunx n.MA, t.UR conjunct n.NE,

>> t.ME conj. n.SA

>

>Hi Dietmar,

>

>Doesn't look too nice for SF, thanks.

 

Hi...

 

I've missed some posts as messed up my account, so I'm jumping in

here with this new post from Steve in my mailbox. The chart that looks the

worst to me is still the K Leo 2004 ingress for San Francisco: Uranus at

the M.C. opposed by Moon-Mars-Mercury and Pluto on the descendant with a

quincunx from Saturn and a square from Jupiter. Also Rahu trines

Mars-Mercury. I don't know why Jyotish gives full power to trines of

Rahu/Ketu.

 

So we'll see...we still have the rather dire predictions made for May on

this list that haven't happened yet--except for Iraq, of course, which is

one long horror story. But the predictions here didn't focus on Iraq.

 

Therese

 

 

>

>The Los Angeles chart we always used was the foundation date of Sept 4,

>1781.

>The old Church of Light here in LA gave a time of 9:17 AM LMT and the

>First Temple of Astrology gave 9:00 AM. How the exact times were derived

>I'm not sure, but I think it has more to do with historical fact than

>astrological rectification.

>

>The Mexican provincial governor named the city on that day: " El Pueblo

>de Nuestra Senora la Reina de Los Angeles " or The Village of our Lady,

>the Queen of the Angels.

>

>

>http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108549.html

>

>

>There is also an incorporation date of April 4, 1850:

>

>http://lacounty.info/incorp.htm

>

>

>I'll have to get busy and check this out, i.e in relation to spring of

>2005.

>

>

>Best,

>

>Steve

>

>>

>

>

>