Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 At 02:35 PM 1/8/04 +0100, Pingo wrote: >...I thought I could >share my views regarding rainfall and Jupiter placement. I lived in >Prague(14.26E, 50.05N),Czech republic.There was a greater rainfall in August >2002 which resulted in flooding destroying many things >(buildings,libraries...) The floods were maximum on the 14.8.2002 . Garth >Allen teaches us that Jupiter should be in contact with the angles of the >horoscope of a given locality for heavy precipitation. Moreover any aspect >between Jupiter and Sun is very important for rainfall. I think that Neptune >contacts with the angles should not be neglected as well as strong aspects >of Venus and the Moon. Now let apply these rules to what happened in >Prague. Thank you for your data, Pingo. Can you tell us how you progressed the charts since you didn't note this. >Using the Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa and casting the Capricorn and Cancer >ingresses of the Sun for the 2002, I got the following: >**SOLAR CAPRICORN INGRESS**... >****Please note among other things that Neptune is strongly opposing the >ascending degree of Prague(11Can14). This is interesting that a main aspect is to the birth chart of Prague. I found similar important aspects of the southern California fires this year (aspects to the Ascendant of California.) >Now progressing this chart to 14.8.2002 > >***** Please note that at the time of maximum floods, the progressed >ascendant is in conjunction with the Prague ascending degree while opposing >the Neptune ingress position. Very interesting! > >**SOLAR CANCER INGRESS** >17 Jul 2002 AD 13:45:21 GMT +1:00 (JD: 2452473.031493) > *****By progressing the Cansolar to the date of maximun flooding, we can >see that the progressed ascendant is in trine to the Ingress Jupiter-Sun >conjunction. I noted in reading an article by Donald Bradley (Garth Allen) that at first he used standard ingress charts. Then he changed to using the ingress of the Moon into sidereal Capricorn each month. I am still interested in comparing these two kinds of charts. Then in our post you used the solar ingress charts for heavy rainfall. Will we ever figure it all out? Thanks again for your data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 Hello Therese, > > Thank you for your data, Pingo. Can you tell us how you progressed the > charts since you didn't note this. Aldebaran 1.BETA did all the progressions for me. The angles of the ingress chart are progressed by the Quotidian method at the rate of the right ascension of the mean Sun. This rate is given by Fagan as 9.856 seconds per hour or 3min 56.556 secs per day. This moves the angles at approx 1 degree per day. Fagan progressed the planets at a secondary progressed rate, or a day for a year. Therefore,they are more or less stationary with the exception of the Moon ,which moves about 1* per month. There is a file showing how to progress the planets in the files section. > I noted in reading an article by Donald Bradley (Garth Allen) that at first > he used standard ingress charts. Then he changed to using the ingress of > the Moon into sidereal Capricorn each month. I am still interested in > comparing these two kinds of charts. Then in our post you used the solar > ingress charts for heavy rainfall. Will we ever figure it all out? > > Thanks again for your data. The solar ingress chart can be also used for rainfall.The solar ingress into sidereal Capricorn is the master chart,which is valid for all year.That is why it can be progressed to predict events happening during the year. Cheers, Pingo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.