Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 At 07:13 AM 1/15/03 -0800, Damon wrote (quoting Ed?): >Most of his posts fall into the category of linguistic fallacies or unintelligible arguments simply on the grounds that he refuses to use vocabulary that his audience can grasp. >Example:The Incandescent Absolute involutedly evolves with ontological gyrations: therefore all mankind is condemned to the eternal now of groundless freedom. Was that really in a post on this board? Whew!! I don't know what it means either. Guess my M.A. isn't worth much. >I learned how to treat people with kindness, dignity and respect. Then, Damon, stay on this board and refuse to respond to any post that doesn't have understanding and respect behind it, and don't post offensive messages yourself. No one has to read or respond to posts they find offensive. I don't know why Internet discussion boards often seem to bring out aggressive and critical behavior. I just visited a board yesterday where members collectively agreed not to respond to certain posters. There's nothing wrong with varied opinions on astrology. Arguing about differences can be entertaining and educational. But there's no excuse to attack a person as an individual. Terese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.