Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 At 12:06 AM 1/8/04 -0000, Matthew Quellas wrote: >I've worked with the sidereal Cardinal solar ingresses for over a >decade, with emphasis on the CapSolar as the framework for the year. A couple of articles can be seen at www.astrologyworldonline.com for an outline of techniques I have >found useful with them. You're so modest, Matthew!! (No sarcasm intended.) Those are excellent articles, and I expect the best exposition that has ever been written on the use of the sidereal cardinal ingress charts. But anyone who hasn't checked out these articles yet, be warned--they do take some studying and concentration to get the whole picture. These progressed charts are perhaps the primary reason that western sidereal astrology hasn't attracted the attention that Jyotish has. You need a good mathematical brain to grasp the western sidereal picture, and most astrologers come under the one planet that research has linked to astrologers: Neptune!! (Marcello Borges published an article on his research in the ISAR Journal. If anyone is interested, I'll look it up.) Matthew, I'm checking out the articles you recommended. Bradley had a very persuasive way of expressing himself. (Read 'top-notch fiery and dramatic TV type attorney...') Whether he's right or not, I suspect he'd blow over anyone who might want to disagree with him. Yes, he gives enough information on his rainfall research so that it can now be replicated. All the relevant weather information must be on the internet now. It's true, isn't it, that Bradley's arguments for the S.V.P. are based solely on ingress charts and on his own statistical studies? Studies which I guess we'll never see because he seemed to indicate that the data was confidential. So the argument for the S.V.P. (Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa) is based on the 'wet' planets relationship to ingress angles for rainfall charts while the main argument for the Lahiri ayanamsa is based on the use of divisional charts (such as the navamsa) for individuals. And there is no statistical data on the divisional charts that I know of. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 , Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> wrote: > It's true, isn't it, that Bradley's arguments for the S.V.P. are based > solely on ingress charts and on his own statistical studies? Studies which > I guess we'll never see because he seemed to indicate that the data was > confidential. > > So the argument for the S.V.P. (Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa) is based on the > 'wet' planets relationship to ingress angles for rainfall charts while the > main argument for the Lahiri ayanamsa is based on the use of divisional > charts (such as the navamsa) for individuals. And there is no statistical > data on the divisional charts that I know of. --------- Therese and List members, To the best of my recall, his refinement of the SVP was based on use of ingresses, generally progressed to a given event for a date and place. And, yes, that's a lot of charts. He did not rely exclusively on the rainfall study, as precipitation is not always a specific single date-oriented event. He did use tons of data over a long period of time. Sidereally yours, Matthew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 Use of ingress charts and using their progressions are two seperate realities. If you are saying that he used both, then you open up the questions of: Did he utilize the Bija rate or the Standard Rate? Did he use the mean quotidian or any of the other various progression rates? To understand how he did it requires reading the author himself. Juan --- mquellas <mquellas wrote: > Therese and List members, > > To the best of my recall, his refinement of the SVP > was based on use > of ingresses, generally progressed to a given event > for a date and > place. > > Sidereally yours, > Matthew > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close > to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: > - > Un: > - > List owner: > -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.