Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Request to geeta ji

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

geeta ji for ur kind information, shri umesh sharma ji's father in

law was international hockey refree and he used various pens for

pandit ji as gifts from abroad and pandit ji used these pens in

analysis and in fact writting one of these books also. he was also a

keen lalkitab enthusiast and was instrumental in translating these

books for umesh sharma. i know this family personally but his father

in law never boasted of such an absurd thing like HIS CONSENT FOR

READING OR PRACTISISNG. if u don't believe my words u can surely

crosscheck the facts with pt. ji's family.

u have every right to say what is ur personal opinion but PLEASE BE

CAREFUL IN PUTTING WORDS INTO PT.JI'S MOUTH. it is hard to tolerate.

kulbir bains

 

> ; , Geeta Pahuja

> <geetp56@> wrote:

> >

> > My dear Mr Varun

> >

> > How can you even imagine that Punditji was merely an astologer

for

> our family, please don't you even think about this. My father

has

> given his whole life to this book and he had spend all his

years

> of life with Punditji and Lal Kitab when he could have spend for

> himself. In his short life he looked after the well being of so

> many people. When I read Lal Kitab I can feel the soul of Pundit

> ji . Pundit ji was never an astrologer for our family he was a man

> who was given a special task and power. Pundit Ji gave my father

his

> consent to study the Lal Kitab which he obeyed and thousands of

> people were blessed by my father and my father never expected and

> never thought even in his dreams, of any monetry gain or fame in

> return, which is expected by each and every astrologer in today's

> time. First and the last thing Pundit Ji taught us was not to take

> anything in return specially fame and I have seen every

astrologer

> in these different groups are justifying and trying

> > to impose things, may be to show themselves that they are big

> scholars and more intelligent then others. Lal kitab is not our

> Vedic astrology where our religious pundits perform something for

> us. Religious pundits are defined and recognised by their fields

> where they earn their living for keeping our culture, sanskar, and

> our relations alive by connecting us to our ancestors. You all

are

> studying Lal Kitab but using it in your own way and telling me I

> am saying hearsay stories. I don't care what you say and what you

> believe or what you don't believe. Every body has their own

belief .

> I am not in this business and I know to whom should I clarify.

> You are getting some information from Internet or from somewhere

> and want to impose on us, and we who are living and practically

> experiencing it for 47 years you call them hearsay stories. What

a

> nice and honest logic you are giving. I have read full Lal Kitab

in

> urdu more than 20 times, you may say again that I am

> > saying hearsay stories. I would like to know if anybody in

your

> group has read Lal Kitab in Urdu even once with full

understandsing

> and heart.I know what I know I don't have to prove it to any

group.

> >

> > geeta

> >

> >

> > ho.in> wrote: Respected Geeta

> didi ji,

> >

> > Just search the net for Indian coins and you will know the

truth.

> > The information I had collected is from 'Wikipedia'. If you

think

> it

> > is unrelaible, I can't help.

> >

> > I had explained my views on the hearsay stories earlier. I am

> afraid

> > I can not believe any of the hearsay stories.

> >

> > I will accept any thing and every thing which is either logical

> or

> > is recorded by Pandit ji himself.

> >

> > For you and your family Pandit ji might have been an

astrologer.

> But

> > I hold Pandit ji in a much greater regard and reverance because

> he

> > is my 'manas Guru'.

> >

> > I sincerely apologise if any of my statements have ever hurt

you.

> I

> > need your blessings. Keep me blessed.

> >

> > With regards and affection,

> >

> > Varun Trivedi

> >

> > , Geeta Pahuja

> > <geetp56@> wrote:

> > >

> > > It appears you were not even born at that time. My husband

used

> do

> > paise ka sikka untill 1966. I cannot understand why you are

> giving

> > information which is completely wrong and only read from some

> books.

> > Even in the UK where I live, nikal was started to add to

copper

> > coins after 1983. And the best way to check is with

> magnet.Hundreds

> > of coins which belong to 1983 or before, I checked were pure

> copper

> > and coins after 1983 are all mixed. I did this experiment

> because

> > my daughter was doing this project in school . Only little

> problem

> > in india is of fake coins. But I am 100% sure that we have used

> do

> > paise ka taanbe ka mori wals paisa untill 1966. You cannot give

> > logic for things which are already clear in our mind. Pundit ji

> > always told the remedies which were very easy to be performed

> even

> > by a very poor person. At that time he would not ask to so many

> poor

> > people who were visiting him to go to silversmith or goldsmith

to

> > attach a hook to copper coin.I have one letter of

> > > punditji's handwritten to my dad with me. many other good

> > things he wrote for me and for my sisters and brother with his

> red

> > pen which are still with us. My father was born in 1922, I have

> > experience of 30 years(from the age of 15) and if I include my

> > childhood lal Kitab is in my blood. For having the true sense

of

> > Lal Kitab I studied Lal Kitab in Urdu, I did diploma in urdu

from

> > Delhi university.

> > >

> > >

> > > geeta

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > varun_trvd <varun_trvd@>

> > wrote: Respected Geeta Didi &

> > Kiranjit Kumar ji,

> > >

> > > Pt. Roop Chand ji was an enlightened divine person. Even if

he

> > gave

> > > some one a pinch of ash {mercury bud} for an upaya of

mercury

> > 11th

> > > it would have worked. But we normal mortals do not have that

> > > miraculous power. We do not enjoy that freedom or liberty.

> > Therefore

> > > it will not be wise on our part to administer any upaya

> without

> > > understanding the logic of how it works.

> > >

> > > I am happy that Kiranjit ji has termed it as “ dissecting

> under

> > an

> > > electron microscope†, that is exactly what scientific

> temper is

> > all

> > > about…dissecting and analyzing. There is nothing wrong in

it

> nor

> > it

> > > should be taken as sacrilegious.

> > >

> > > Out of the discussion, so far, two views have emerged. One

is

> > based

> > > on hearsay and the other based on logic. The problem with

the

> > > hearsay view is that there will be no end to such views :

> every

> > body

> > > could come up with a new view. Of these views which to

accept

> as

> > > authentic and which to reject will have to be a subjective

> > exercise.

> > > Therefore I personally am inclined to reject them all. In

that

> > > eventuality the only alternative left is to go by what is

> proved

> > > through impartial, nonpartisan method known as scientific

> logic

> > of

> > > deduction or inference.

> > >

> > > Geeta didi I have seen some of the old one paisa coins known

> as “

> > > dubbal†which were minted till 1947. That one paisa coin

> known

> > as "

> > > dubbal " is without a hole. This paisa was of copper. It is

> almost

> > an

> > > inch wide.

> > >

> > > After 1947 till 1957 the paisa coins minted included the

coin

> > with a

> > > hole. This coin was of copper and nickel.

> > >

> > > After 1957, with the decimal system, the paisa coins minted

> were

> > all

> > > nickel and no copper. The coins once again didn’t have a

> hole.

> > >

> > > I believe that the paisa used for upaya till 1947 and may be

a

> > few

> > > years after must have been the “dubbal†- the one

without

> a

> > hole.

> > > Please remember that the context and the only latest source

> book

> > we

> > > have is 1952 edition of Lal Kitab. That is the only

authentic

> > record

> > > we can fall back on. And till 1952 the 'dubbal' must have

been

> > quite

> > > commonly available.

> > >

> > > Kiran jit ji, I am surprised that a person like you who

claims

> > > having been a regular at Pandit ji’s Sunday durbars

> wouldn’t know

> > > his name. His name is Pt. Roop Chand Joshi and not Pt. Roop

> Lal

> > as

> > > you have mentioned twice in your message.

> > >

> > > With respect and great regards,

> > >

> > > Varun Trivedi

> > >

> > > , " kapatjal "

> > > <kapatjal@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > U R very right Geeta ji.In fact,i was thinking of getting

> your

> > > > opinion on this cu paisa issue which was discussed before

> your

> > > > first post was put on board.

> > > > I have no doubt that it is a 'chhed wala paisa'

> and " dhalai

> > wala

> > > > ring or bangle " which should be used for remedial purposes.

> > > > Unfortunately, logic people can dissect the written thing

> under

> > > the

> > > > electron microscope;but they cannot feel or understand the

> > soul.In

> > > > fact, the very idea of lk was to help the people and to

> help

> > > > themselves by reading the Lk. This open ended ring and

> > bangle,hook

> > > > wala paisa and small copper utensils with a screwed lid

etc.

> > were

> > > > started by first line of lk practioner professionals

> somewhere

> > > > around 1990.If one believes in Lk,he can blindly follow

what

> is

> > > > written in Lk and get the benefits.Respected pundiy ji not

> only

> > > > practised lk, he also took the help of face reading from

the

> > photo

> > > > and palmistry.Only those who have been visiting pt. Ji's

> > > meetings

> > > > can understand and appreciate lk in its real sense.I do

not

> > know

> > > > much about the theory part and i have to open and read Lk

> > whenver

> > > i

> > > > want to find something.But I have been attending his

Sunday

> > > durbars

> > > > at pharwala and can feel its essence.I have also met and

> > visited

> > > > many of famous LK practitioners.

> > > >

> > > > Wih all this logic,I am sure reverred Pt.Roop Lal ji even

> would

> > > have

> > > > to read his LK again and again and perhaps rewrite it.One

> > > heartening

> > > > feature is that all the Gurujans and seniors do really

know

> and

> > > > understand LK and ultimately when they continue working

in

> > this

> > > > field with an open and receptive mind,shall truly serve

the

> > > mankind

> > > > as par the wishes of pt.roop lalji.

> > > > With best wishes,

> > > > sincerey,

> > > > kiranjeet

> > > >

> > > > In , " varun_trvd "

> > > > <varun_trvd@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Kiranjit Kumar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > The copper coin used in the upaya is the one which does

> not

> > have

> > > a

> > > > > hole in it.

> > > > >

> > > > > If a coin has a hole, then it will be said to have a "

> budh

> > ka

> > > > > dayara " , therefore a copper coin with a hole will be sun

+

> > budh.

> > > > >

> > > > > The word " dayara " denotes an area closed all around; the

> hole

> > in

> > > > the

> > > > > coin or the empty space in the center of the coin is

the "

> > budh

> > > ka

> > > > > dayara " .

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes you are right if a coin with a hole is used for this

> > upaya

> > > it

> > > > > will not be effective.

> > > > >

> > > > > With regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Varun Trivedi

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > , kiranjit

kumar

> > > > > <kapatjal@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > dear varunji;

> > > > > > thanks for your reply.

> > > > > > referene your lines'By no stretch of imagination one

> > > > > > can justify a karak object of mercury being

established

> to

> > > > nullify

> > > > > > the poison of mercury.'

> > > > > > For Budh 11, the remedy,already talked about,is cu

> > coin.now

> > > Cu

> > > > > is for sun and the circular shape goes for Budh.

> > > > > > then this remedy should not be efective?

> > > > > > with regards and best wishes;

> > > > > > kiranjeet

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love

> > > > > > (and love to hate): TV's Guilty Pleasures list.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger.

> Know

> > how!

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Know

> how!

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...