Location, location, location

[Guest guest]

NASA lost the sensors at 8:53 AM, EST, the explosion was about 9 AM,

EST, (I think), With the shuttle traveling at about 200 miles per

minute it would have traveled about 1400 miles between the loss of

data from the sensors and the explosion. The air distance in statute

miles from Dallas to Los Angeles is about 1250 miles. Do the Sidereal

Caplunar (Fagan-Bradley) for Los Angeles (close to location at the

time of loss of sensor info) preceeding the explosion! Progress the

RAMC by the difference in RA of return Moon and transiting Moon at

time of info loss!! Trouble may have started (probably did) over the

ocean or west coast.

 

Also interesting to relocate lift-off chart to Dallas!

 

Sure is spooky being in this big ol place alone. Ed, where are you?

Lots of work to do before Feb 13 to 18 and early Mar.

 

Bob

[Guest guest]

, " Bob <jan61108> "

<jan61108> wrote:

> NASA lost the sensors at 8:53 AM, EST, the explosion was about 9

AM,

> EST, (I think), With the shuttle traveling at about 200 miles per

> minute it would have traveled about 1400 miles between the loss of

> data from the sensors and the explosion. The air distance in

statute

> miles from Dallas to Los Angeles is about 1250 miles. Do the

Sidereal

> Caplunar (Fagan-Bradley) for Los Angeles (close to location at the

> time of loss of sensor info) preceeding the explosion! Progress the

> RAMC by the difference in RA of return Moon and transiting Moon at

> time of info loss!! Trouble may have started (probably did) over

the

> ocean or west coast.

>

>

My guess about LA was incorrect but re-doing the charts for San

Francisco places Pluto rather than Saturn nearest an angle at the

approximate location at the time the heat spike which occured onboard

the space shuttle was recorded. Only minutes or perhaps seconds

before, the Mars\Saturn midpoint would have squared the MC, preceeded

by Mars\Pluto opposite the MC, and shortly before that Mars would

have been in opposition. Shortly after this time would have come the

midpoint of Saturn\Pluto square the MC, followed by Saturn conjunct

the MC. The earlier aspects would have occurred west of San Franciso

(over the ocean), the later ones east. By right ascension Pluto was 1

degree from the IC. At virtually the same time of the conjunction,

Saturn would have been 90 degrees in RA from the ASC. I have placed

the chart in the files section.

 

 

http://makeashorterlink.com/?N48C31753

 

Bob

[Guest guest]

, " Bob <jan61108> "

<jan61108> wrote:

 

Hi Bob

i was watching the landing online, and they mentioned it being over

san francisco at about that time, las vegas a bit later and than

dallas as the last location mentioned.

Harriet

> >

> My guess about LA was incorrect but re-doing the charts for San

> Francisco places Pluto rather than Saturn nearest an angle at the

> approximate location at the time the heat spike which occured

onboard

> the space shuttle was recorded. Only minutes or perhaps seconds

> before, the Mars\Saturn midpoint would have squared the MC,

preceeded

> by Mars\Pluto opposite the MC, and shortly before that Mars would

> have been in opposition. Shortly after this time would have come

the

> midpoint of Saturn\Pluto square the MC, followed by Saturn conjunct

> the MC. The earlier aspects would have occurred west of San

Franciso

> (over the ocean), the later ones east. By right ascension Pluto was

1

> degree from the IC. At virtually the same time of the conjunction,

> Saturn would have been 90 degrees in RA from the ASC. I have placed

> the chart in the files section.

>

>

> http://makeashorterlink.com/?N48C31753

>

> Bob