Bradley and Rainfall

[Guest guest]

At 07:13 AM 1/14/04 -0000, Matthew wrote:

 

>[MQ]The Jupiter data does not involve progressing any charts. It is

>based on Jupiter's meridian distance, it's angular distance from the

>CapLunar Ingress MC for each instance of rainfall.

--------

 

Then this would be very easy to check out. But, since I couldn't really

make it out from the rainfall articles--Rainfall 2 goes on and on and

on...Do you know what percentage of times of the total instances of

heaviest rainfall Jupiter was X distance from the Ingress MC? (I really got

lost in all of Bradley's verbage...)

 

Somewhere in one of those articles I saw the figure 4 out of 12 instances.

But that may have been a preliminary study. We really need the bottom line

to replicate the research even in small numbers of times of heavy rainfall.

 

All we need is a simple figure:

Jupiter was within X (degrees) of the Ingress MC in X number of charts

among Y (total number) of charts. (This won't satisfy the statistics

people, but it will satisfy the more simple minded like myself.)

 

Forget 'moving totals' and all that other statistical lingo. How many times

out of how many charts??? Did Bradley ever give us this figure? Is it out

there somewhere? Or is the percentage out there somewhere?

 

I'm thinking of somehow finding the time to set up a group of low vs high

rainfall charts. This is why I'm asking about Bradley's figures. (We also

need the lowest rainfall to compare to the high rainfall to make sure that

Jupiter isn't near the MC that often by chance.)

 

I figure you're the expert on Bradley's writings, Matthew, so you'd know if

the figures were available, or somewhere in those articles.

 

Thanks,

Therese