RE: Digest Number 534

[Guest guest]

Interesting, this past discussion: Transit Moon in Taurus,

conjunct my Jupiter and square tr. Uranus. All in fixed signs.

 

______________________

Message: 2

Sat, 03 May 2003 20:29:46 -0000

" alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio

The futility of the astrological lists-Hindu

 

Hi Alfonso: Perhaps it is better to exchange information here,

There are as many principles and experiences with astrology as

there are tastes. About tastes .....is hard to agree.

>> The reason why I did not start with Hindu concepts is, I

would be cut off from Uranus, Neptune and Pluto and the rest.

>> These planets have shown great influence in history,par

example the Colombia chart (12-17-1819. 4:14:12PM.) Quite an

interesting chart. Moon in Sagitarius conjunct Neptune in X;

Mc is in Scorpio. See for yourself.

At the time that Anthony Blair was preparing to win for

the Labourparty, in England, the tropical astrologers, every

where, said the Conservative Party would win. Anth.Blair was

the one, in accordance to the sidereal calculations.

 

Regards Anny.

 

 

 

Message: 3

Sat, 03 May 2003 20:34:49 -0000

" brianrhiggins2003 " <brianrhiggins2003

Today I am an Aries.

 

Hi Brian! A few years ago Insurance Companies in England

published their research concerning motorists.

The final conclusion was: The Taurus made the most victims

in car accidents. Do you laugh at this too?! The Taurusman/wife

probably could not believe his/her ears! Poor Taurus! Now they

are the victim. More premium to pay and the Aries new cars.

That is more than premium.Never met a Taurus who is stuntman.

Regards Anny

_____________________

______________________

 

Message: 4

Sat, 03 May 2003 14:27:41 -0700

Therese Hamilton <eastwest

Re: The futility of the astrological lists-Hindu

 

Alfonso,

> Who started about Diana's birthtime? How many astrologers have shuffledd

> with the birthtime to make the chart right at their taste of experience?

> Penny Thorton in " Synastrie for two " did not mention Diana's birthtime,

> but her -though tropical figure- agrees, with my statement, that official

> time is the best for research.

 

Cheerio Anny

______________________

______________________

 

Message: 5

Sat, 03 May 2003 14:31:50 -0700

Therese Hamilton <eastwest

RE: Digest Number 532

 

 

Here we are running into the house controversy. I have Saturn, Jupiter and

the Moon in the 5th house, not the 4th. So right away we have to discuss,

" What is a house??!! "

 

Therese!It was about the wrong chart discussion. Saturnus and Jupiter show

up

in the first house(7:45 chart). Indeed it is a Saturnus influence looking

down,

if not speaking. But Gemini is shy some times!! My memory speaks of the

first

time I saw her on TV. Probably you are talking of 15 years later.

 

>>You are right Therese. I better keep the Uranian Points to myself. I did

not want to keep all experiences to myself.

 

Ah, Anny!! Tropical-Sidereal mix-up here! It's sidereal Taurus (rules the

tongue and throat) that likes to talk, not Gemini. That's only in the

Tropical zodiac. See, sidereal astrologers are already confused about their

signs!!

 

Therese Tropicalists are using concepts from early astrological experiences.

The sidereal astrology started with the notitions of experiences. When

Ptolemeus started with his four books, the equinox did notyet arrived

at 0° Aries. It was 4 degrees Aries. It is not all bad what tropicalist

aim at, only they have not yet discovered why their prognoses do not

work anymore.

 

Not always. It depends on what planets are aspecting the ascendant. Venus

and Moon give roundness, Mars give sharpness, etc. However, the type of

eyebrow structure seems to correlate with decanates.

 

>> You are right, the ascendant is also speaking, but the sun is important.

An astrologer, a long time ago, thought my husband was a Sagitarius person

because of his Jupiter appearance (Then I was a pupil) My husband's sun was

conjunct Jupiter, in Gemini.(18 June). A tall and joyous person.

 

_

Message: 7

Sat, 03 May 2003 22:56:37 -0700

Richard <erichardg

Re: Digest Number 532

 

 

>Richard, Thanks very much for the two birthtimes.

I prefer the official one, 7:45

 

Message: 18

Sun, 04 May 2003 16:57:50 -0000

" alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio

Astrology is not a science!

 

 

>> Astrology, is based on knowlegde by experience.

All faculties are based on that.

 

Anny

 

Leonardo da Vinci

April 14, 1452

9:03:39 pm UT

Anchiano, Italy

 

>> This is really interesting. Which source is this?

 

>> I have the 15th of April 1452 Julian Calender,3:00 AM

from a database in Germany. I have not studied yet.

Regards, Anny