Guest guest Posted May 5, 2003 Report Share Posted May 5, 2003 Anny: Hi. Very cordially I want to recall you that I am not discussing your astrological tastes. In fact I am not criticizing you at all because you don't practice hindu astrology, what I have been recommending you is to drop the use of asteroids, no matter which zodiac you use. By the way, although I follow many of the concepts of hindu astrology, I do incorporate some outer planets, but JUST 3: Uranus, neptune and pluto. And finally the chart you have for Colombia is inexact. Don't think that all the data Campion gives is correct. In regard to Diana's chart I think the best analysis of her chart was done by Richard Houck, a late vedic astrologer. Alfonso Osorio _________________ > Anny wrote: > > Hi Alfonso: Perhaps it is better to exchange information here, > There are as many principles and experiences with astrology as > there are tastes. About tastes .....is hard to agree. > >> The reason why I did not start with Hindu concepts is, I > would be cut off from Uranus, Neptune and Pluto and the rest. > >> These planets have shown great influence in history,par > example the Colombia chart (12-17-1819. 4:14:12PM.) Quite an > interesting chart. Moon in Sagitarius conjunct Neptune in X; > Mc is in Scorpio. See for yourself. > At the time that Anthony Blair was preparing to win for > the Labourparty, in England, the tropical astrologers, every > where, said the Conservative Party would win. Anth.Blair was > the one, in accordance to the sidereal calculations. > > Regards Anny. > > > > ____________________ _ > ____________________ __ > > Message: 4 > Sat, 03 May 2003 14:27:41 -0700 > Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> > Re: The futility of the astrological lists-Hindu > > Alfonso, > > Who started about Diana's birthtime? How many astrologers have shuffledd > > with the birthtime to make the chart right at their taste of experience? > > Penny Thorton in " Synastrie for two " did not mention Diana's birthtime, > > but her -though tropical figure- agrees, with my statement, that official > > time is the best for research. > > Cheerio Anny > ____________________ __ > ____________________ __ > > Message: 5 > Sat, 03 May 2003 14:31:50 -0700 > Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> > RE: Digest Number 532 > > > Here we are running into the house controversy. I have Saturn, Jupiter and > the Moon in the 5th house, not the 4th. So right away we have to discuss, > " What is a house??!! " > > Therese!It was about the wrong chart discussion. Saturnus and Jupiter show > up > in the first house(7:45 chart). Indeed it is a Saturnus influence looking > down, > if not speaking. But Gemini is shy some times!! My memory speaks of the > first > time I saw her on TV. Probably you are talking of 15 years later. > > >>You are right Therese. I better keep the Uranian Points to myself. I did > not want to keep all experiences to myself. > > Ah, Anny!! Tropical-Sidereal mix-up here! It's sidereal Taurus (rules the > tongue and throat) that likes to talk, not Gemini. That's only in the > Tropical zodiac. See, sidereal astrologers are already confused about their > signs!! > > Therese Tropicalists are using concepts from early astrological experiences. > The sidereal astrology started with the notitions of experiences. When > Ptolemeus started with his four books, the equinox did notyet arrived > at 0° Aries. It was 4 degrees Aries. It is not all bad what tropicalist > aim at, only they have not yet discovered why their prognoses do not > work anymore. > > Not always. It depends on what planets are aspecting the ascendant. Venus > and Moon give roundness, Mars give sharpness, etc. However, the type of > eyebrow structure seems to correlate with decanates. > > >> You are right, the ascendant is also speaking, but the sun is important. > An astrologer, a long time ago, thought my husband was a Sagitarius person > because of his Jupiter appearance (Then I was a pupil) My husband's sun was > conjunct Jupiter, in Gemini.(18 June). A tall and joyous person. > > _ > Message: 7 > Sat, 03 May 2003 22:56:37 -0700 > Richard <erichardg@e...> > Re: Digest Number 532 > > > >Richard, Thanks very much for the two birthtimes. > I prefer the official one, 7:45 > > Message: 18 > Sun, 04 May 2003 16:57:50 -0000 > " alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio> > Astrology is not a science! > > > >> Astrology, is based on knowlegde by experience. > All faculties are based on that. > > Anny > > Leonardo da Vinci > April 14, 1452 > 9:03:39 pm UT > Anchiano, Italy > > >> This is really interesting. Which source is this? > > >> I have the 15th of April 1452 Julian Calender,3:00 AM > from a database in Germany. I have not studied yet. > Regards, Anny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2003 Report Share Posted May 6, 2003 , " alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio> wrote: what I have been > recommending you is to drop the use of asteroids, no matter which > zodiac you use. > Ahh, now here's something I can agree with. - E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.