Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 This is the result of staistiacal test with a more than sufficient size of AA (BC/BR in hand or quoted) sample chatrs, not just talking about someone's personal experience or dreaming. And so such kind of question doesn't arise. > I found another DOC file in the database of the group which concludes > that the rule has a high rejection ratio even for correct times. Do anyone on thelist agree to this?... , " Padmanabh " <light_of_erindir wrote: > > > Hello everyone on the list, I just wanted to discuss about theCKV rule > used to rectify the birth times. > > I have already contacted Mr. Rangarajan and Mr. Kadirvelu personally > to know more about the rule. I want to know what are your experiences > based on the rule. > > I found another DOC file in the database of the group which concludes > that the rule has a high rejection ratio even for correct times. Do > anyone on thelist agree to this?...also it necessitates that EVERY > CHART must have a fourth cusp such that the gender indicated by it > MUST be female simultaneously with 9th cusp leading to Male gender > using the technique. > > This seems highly unlikely to be true for EVERY CHART.Yet, the paper > says that the rule has been verified for thousands of charts...so I > may be wrong...I can't test on my own cause I don't have such a huge > database. > > Please post your views on this method. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 dear frends, sorry to hold diferent view on rectification of birth time. astrology is a divine scince which requires speacial virtues to practise can not be limited with thumb rules, if that was the case rishis wud have left everything open. rishis whu had abilities to predict unseen properties of mars or other planets 1000s of year bac or predict well in advance of specfic more than lakhs of native whu gonna take birth after 1000s of year latter,, for them this wud have not been a difficult task. to avoid misuse of astrology they kept few knots, beleving that any person with divinity and intution truely will decode this. answering bac to the question concern regarding relationships of sub lord being male or female in case of 9th or 4th, why we not extend ourself more into strenth of sign in case if it is tronger than cusp sub lord,there may be few exceptions to rules?? another view is also that some people are known for thier physical charactors and other for a mental. if 4th cusp lord if is male, there may be posibilities dominating mental qualities signifing feminity over ruling gender which is only a part of pernality or nativity parashari has guidelien to analyze chart based on stronger among lagna sun sign amd moon sign, atlest shud not we conseder moon sign sir krishnamurthy too have recmended these factros in one of his book. i m abslutely new to kp and and cant authoratively dictate anything. but i beleve in fact that more questions, more confusion finally going to help us learn better, cloudy sky always gives birth to more brighter sunshine regards ramesh , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > This is the result of staistiacal test with a more than sufficient > size of AA (BC/BR in hand or quoted) sample chatrs, not just > talking about someone's personal experience or dreaming. And so such > kind of question doesn't arise. > > > > > I found another DOC file in the database of the group which > concludes > that the rule has a high rejection ratio even for > correct times. > Do anyone on thelist agree to this?... > > > , " Padmanabh " > <light_of_erindir@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone on the list, I just wanted to discuss about theCKV > rule > > used to rectify the birth times. > > > > I have already contacted Mr. Rangarajan and Mr. Kadirvelu > personally > > to know more about the rule. I want to know what are your > experiences > > based on the rule. > > > > I found another DOC file in the database of the group which > concludes > > that the rule has a high rejection ratio even for correct times. > Do > > anyone on thelist agree to this?...also it necessitates that EVERY > > CHART must have a fourth cusp such that the gender indicated by it > > MUST be female simultaneously with 9th cusp leading to Male gender > > using the technique. > > > > This seems highly unlikely to be true for EVERY CHART.Yet, the > paper > > says that the rule has been verified for thousands of charts...so > I > > may be wrong...I can't test on my own cause I don't have such a > huge > > database. > > > > Please post your views on this method. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.