Guest guest Posted March 29, 2003 Report Share Posted March 29, 2003 At 12:17 AM 3/29/03 -0800, Gerald wrote: > > It seems to me that any zodiacs chosen will > ultimately have to be tested against events. I > refer for example to angular or house division > contacts of planets simultaneous with events. That > would be a matter of least-squares or statistical > fitting, as far as science goes. These fits may > always be fuzzy due to the shape of the correlation > curves. But usually the more approximate results are > known well in advance from simple observation. With > today's computers, it should be possible to decide > on zodiacs in a short time and without any > particular reliance on ancient texts. This would have to be via progressed angles and planets, wouldn't it? This then is within the skill set of sidereal astrologers. The Moon would be important since its position would be different by a day or so. I am not currently working with progressed ingress charts (meaning I'd be no good at it from lack of experience), but maybe there are others who can work with you on these charts. I hope someone is interested. I know that Matthew Quellas works frequently with progressed ingress charts. Maybe he'd be interested. Matthew?? Therese > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > >Shortcut URL to this page: >/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.