Guest guest Posted May 4, 2003 Report Share Posted May 4, 2003 At 11:03 PM 5/3/03 -0700, Richard wrote: > >Jesse, > >Neither Fagan's 2.5* orb nor the three cardinal aspects give the keystone aspect for > >Leonardo da Vinci >April 14, 1452 >9:03:39 pm UT >Anchiano, Italy Richard, how is it possible to have such an exact time for someone born in 1452 when we don't even have such exactitude today with modern clocks and hospital delivery rooms?!! T. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2003 Report Share Posted May 5, 2003 Therese, It was recorded in LMT or LAT, something like that. It is only when it is put into UT that you come up with those dumb seconds. Round off the birth time if you like. An approximate time is quite good enough for me anytime. I can even work the pants off the wrong time. Above all /////////// Read the chart. That's what we're here for. R. Therese Hamilton wrote: > At 11:03 PM 5/3/03 -0700, Richard wrote: > > > >Jesse, > > > >Neither Fagan's 2.5* orb nor the three cardinal aspects give the keystone > aspect for > > > >Leonardo da Vinci > >April 14, 1452 > >9:03:39 pm UT > >Anchiano, Italy > > Richard, how is it possible to have such an exact time for someone born in > 1452 when we don't even have such exactitude today with modern clocks and > hospital delivery rooms?!! > > T. > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.