2:17-2:21 USA chart

[Guest guest]

Chris, the 2:17-2:21 USA chart is discussed in Marc Penfield's HOROSCOPES

OF THE USA AND CANADA and also in an article in ISAR's Fall 1999 issue of

'The International Astrologer.'

To quote from the TIA article:

 

" ...I came across a biography of John Hancock entitled PATRIOT IN PURPLE.

On page 228 of that book it states, " for three days impassioned oratory,

pro and con, echoed throughthe government chamber. At last, about two

o-clock in the afternoon of the fourth, the great white aper was reported

out of the committee to the House with a recommendation for approval, and

was immediately ratified. Hancock and his secrtary, Charles Thomson, were

then ordered to authentiace it with their signatures in the customay

mananer of handling all congressional measures... "

 

" ...if you happen to have a spare $100 bill lying around, look at th back

at the clock on Independence Hall. The time shown is between 2:20 and 2:25

p.m... "

 

Marc Penfield precession corrects his Tropical charts for transits and

returns. In these two articles he discusses why some of the other U.S.A.

charts aren't viable in his opinion.

 

What I like about this chart is the close trine of Jupiter (and the Sun) to

the Ascendant. The USA is Big and a major power in the the world. (Right

now grossly misused power, but power none the same...) Tropical astrologers

talk about this Scorpio ascendant being represented by the USA Eagle. This

is totally misplaced symbolism because Scorpio has nothing to do with the

eagle. It just shows how modern astrology has corrupted the meanings of

zodiac signs when astrologers talk about Scorpio being the scorpion or the

eagle. However, the eagle was Jupiter's bird.

 

I haven't really checked out the various charts for the U.S.A. But whatever

chart is valid, I always believed there had to be a Jupiter aspect to the

ascendant, and in Jyotish the trine is the strongest aspect Jupiter can make.

 

Therese

[Guest guest]

Therese,

 

Thanks for all your leg work.

 

Glad to see it has some basis, although that's not critical.

 

I agree about the Jupiter influence. Also it's important that the

chart ruler Venus is in good shape too. One has to explain the Saturn

aspect from the 12th to the 11 lord Sun however. Not exactly a

textbook chart for wealth and gains. Unless it implies that gains

are ill-gotten through hidden or nefarious means. See free masons

and the Illuminati for more details...

 

Chris

 

, Therese Hamilton

<eastwest@s...> wrote:

> Chris, the 2:17-2:21 USA chart is discussed in Marc Penfield's

HOROSCOPES

> OF THE USA AND CANADA and also in an article in ISAR's Fall 1999

issue of

> 'The International Astrologer.'

> To quote from the TIA article:

>

> " ...I came across a biography of John Hancock entitled PATRIOT IN

PURPLE.

> On page 228 of that book it states, " for three days impassioned

oratory,

> pro and con, echoed throughthe government chamber. At last, about

two

> o-clock in the afternoon of the fourth, the great white aper was

reported

> out of the committee to the House with a recommendation for

approval, and

> was immediately ratified. Hancock and his secrtary, Charles

Thomson, were

> then ordered to authentiace it with their signatures in the customay

> mananer of handling all congressional measures... "

>

> " ...if you happen to have a spare $100 bill lying around, look at

th back

> at the clock on Independence Hall. The time shown is between 2:20

and 2:25

> p.m... "

>

> Marc Penfield precession corrects his Tropical charts for transits

and

> returns. In these two articles he discusses why some of the other

U.S.A.

> charts aren't viable in his opinion.

>

> What I like about this chart is the close trine of Jupiter (and the

Sun) to

> the Ascendant. The USA is Big and a major power in the the world.

(Right

> now grossly misused power, but power none the same...) Tropical

astrologers

> talk about this Scorpio ascendant being represented by the USA

Eagle. This

> is totally misplaced symbolism because Scorpio has nothing to do

with the

> eagle. It just shows how modern astrology has corrupted the

meanings of

> zodiac signs when astrologers talk about Scorpio being the scorpion

or the

> eagle. However, the eagle was Jupiter's bird.

>

> I haven't really checked out the various charts for the U.S.A. But

whatever

> chart is valid, I always believed there had to be a Jupiter aspect

to the

> ascendant, and in Jyotish the trine is the strongest aspect Jupiter

can make.

>

> Therese