Guest guest Posted May 21, 2004 Report Share Posted May 21, 2004 Hi Therese, Rahu/Ketu ugly as they were somehow made their entrance into the feast and tasted the Amrit before nosy Sun and Moon discovered them in outrage. To do this they had to imitate the steppenwalk, the gliding trine of Jupiter. There is a profound lesson here that has never been articulated ~ In the midst of adversity look to your trines to escape. Dark*Star Dark*Star Therese Hamilton wrote: > At 10:22 AM 5/20/04 -0700, Steve wrote: > > > >Dietmar wrote: > > > >> I don't have the L.A. chart but the San Fran. chart for that March > >> 21, 2005 date has a lot of things going on - t.N.Node conjoining > >> n.ME, t.MA square n.PL, t.SA® coming to conj. with n.MA, t.JU > >> square n.MA and opp. n.SA, t.NE quincunx n.MA, t.UR conjunct n.NE, > >> t.ME conj. n.SA > > > >Hi Dietmar, > > > >Doesn't look too nice for SF, thanks. > > Hi... > > I've missed some posts as messed up my account, so I'm jumping in > here with this new post from Steve in my mailbox. The chart that looks the > worst to me is still the K Leo 2004 ingress for San Francisco: Uranus at > the M.C. opposed by Moon-Mars-Mercury and Pluto on the descendant with a > quincunx from Saturn and a square from Jupiter. Also Rahu trines > Mars-Mercury. I don't know why Jyotish gives full power to trines of > Rahu/Ketu. > > So we'll see...we still have the rather dire predictions made for May on > this list that haven't happened yet--except for Iraq, of course, which is > one long horror story. But the predictions here didn't focus on Iraq. > > Therese > > > > >The Los Angeles chart we always used was the foundation date of Sept 4, > >1781. > >The old Church of Light here in LA gave a time of 9:17 AM LMT and the > >First Temple of Astrology gave 9:00 AM. How the exact times were derived > >I'm not sure, but I think it has more to do with historical fact than > >astrological rectification. > > > >The Mexican provincial governor named the city on that day: " El Pueblo > >de Nuestra Senora la Reina de Los Angeles " or The Village of our Lady, > >the Queen of the Angels. > > > > > >http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108549.html > > > > > >There is also an incorporation date of April 4, 1850: > > > >http://lacounty.info/incorp.htm > > > > > >I'll have to get busy and check this out, i.e in relation to spring of > >2005. > > > > > >Best, > > > >Steve > > > >> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2004 Report Share Posted May 21, 2004 At 05:16 PM 5/20/04 -0700, Dark*Star wrote: >There is a profound lesson here that has never been articulated ~ In the midst >of adversity look to your trines to escape. A signle trine, perhaps. But the grand trine in the natal charts acts like high self-built prison walls that the person can't see beyond. In my limited experience, that is. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2004 Report Share Posted May 21, 2004 Therese Hamilton wrote: > The chart that looks the > worst to me is still the K Leo 2004 ingress for San Francisco: Uranus at > the M.C. opposed by Moon-Mars-Mercury and Pluto on the descendant with a > quincunx from Saturn and a square from Jupiter. Also Rahu trines > Mars-Mercury. I don't know why Jyotish gives full power to trines of > Rahu/Ketu. Therese and Dietmar, Another ominous chart is the New Moon of Sept 14, '04, that has Sun/Moon/Mars at the exact same degree, 27 Leo (Fagan) square Pluto at 24 Scorpio. Since the planets are in close conjunction to the Sun they will also be sitting close to 0 latitude (in relation to the ecliptic). The planets will all be angular at the latitude of San Francisco and about 131 W--which is out in the ocean a bit to the west of San Fran. Tokyo will also pick up all these planets angular, with the Sun/Moon/Mars at the IC while Pluto squares MC/IC. Best, Steve > > > So we'll see...we still have the rather dire predictions made for May on > this list that haven't happened yet--except for Iraq, of course, which is > one long horror story. But the predictions here didn't focus on Iraq. > > Therese > > > > > >The Los Angeles chart we always used was the foundation date of Sept 4, > >1781. > >The old Church of Light here in LA gave a time of 9:17 AM LMT and the > >First Temple of Astrology gave 9:00 AM. How the exact times were derived > >I'm not sure, but I think it has more to do with historical fact than > >astrological rectification. > > > >The Mexican provincial governor named the city on that day: " El Pueblo > >de Nuestra Senora la Reina de Los Angeles " or The Village of our Lady, > >the Queen of the Angels. > > > > > >http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108549.html > > > > > >There is also an incorporation date of April 4, 1850: > > > >http://lacounty.info/incorp.htm > > > > > >I'll have to get busy and check this out, i.e in relation to spring of > >2005. > > > > > >Best, > > > >Steve > > > >> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2004 Report Share Posted May 22, 2004 , Steven Stuckey <shastrakara@s...> wrote: > Therese and Dietmar, > > Another ominous chart is the New Moon of Sept 14, '04, that has > Sun/Moon/Mars at the exact same degree, 27 Leo (Fagan) square Pluto at 24 Scorpio. Steve, That's a close conjunction alright! But the aspect from Pluto is a reverse aspect, so I'd look for the effects where Pluto is on an angle and those three planets are affecting Pluto. Fire maybe. Explosions? I tend to want to see oppositions or quincunxes for earth movement. Let's hope that no one on this list has key planets at 27 Leo (Fagan) or 28 Leo (K). Might be a good idea to check ADB for people or events that have planets in that degree. Therese >Since the planets are in close conjunction to the Sun they > will also be sitting close to 0 latitude (in relation to the ecliptic). The planets will all be angular at the latitude of San Francisco and about 131 W--which is out in the ocean a bit to the west of San Fran. Tokyo will also pick up all these planets angular, with the Sun/Moon/Mars at the IC while Pluto squares MC/IC. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.