Sidereal/Vedic

[Guest guest]

At 06:16 PM 4/26/04 -0700, Chris wrote:

>Steve,

>>

>> No, it was Hindu. The word Vedic was coined much later by Chakrapani

>> Ullal.

>

>Really? That's amazing. I didn't realize it could be traced so

>definitively and so recently...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Steve and Chris,

 

When Dr. Raman was in the U.S. in 1992 (?) he didn't use the term Vedic. I

thought it came from K.N. Rao and crew about the time the ACVA was started?

(1993?) Of course Chakrapani was in on the ground floor of the ACVA.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

>> Most of these did not go the Vedic route.

>>

>

>Right. And yet their teachings did not inspire others to follow the Fagan

>route and that is a puzzle.

>(...)

>And so Fagan couldn't satisfy that yearning? I frankly don't know a whole

>lot about the Fagan approach. I had hoped to learn something about it on

>this list, alas it seems to have been taken over.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

I often wonder why the traditional Fagan people don't post more on this

list. Maybe because the system is so entirely mathematical that the

followers of this system can do the math, but are short on word power and

explanations? Matthew tried for awhile, but he covered so many charts all

at once that I personally got very confused. My head couldn't hold it all!

 

Then a siderealist such as Juan will post a few messages and then all is

dead silent again.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

>A sort of pied piper theory here. Perhaps if western sidereal had managed

>to produce someone who had the charisma and communicative abilities of

>Chakrapani, then perhaps things would have worked out differently. Or maybe

>it was just the the time for Hindu...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

True, Chakrapani carried the charisma of India with him. But in the west

sidereal astrology was all math. Most people interested in astrology can't

tune into the math. It has no life for them, and the Fagan school never

settled lots of minute mathematical controversy, like which rate of

progression to use. Also, natal astrology was never really developed. It

was mostly solar and lunar returns and progressing the charts to events.

Also the founding fathers all died early on, and the mags died after a few

years too.

 

Therese