Guest guest Posted January 12, 2004 Report Share Posted January 12, 2004 Hi Therese, Just a small correction. The flooding in Prague occurred in August 2002 instead of 1992. Cheers, Pingo Therese Hamilton wrote: > BRADLEY AND THE AYANAMSA (Part 1) > > I hope I'm not he only one who checked out some of the articles recommended > by Matthew Quellas. Here's one very interesting quote from Donald Bradley > under " Anyanamsa. " (http://www.magee.demon.co.uk/ayanamsa.txt) > > " The point we are getting at here is that a randomly invented, wholly > groundless ayanamsa will yield highly ?significant' ingress charts for a > majority of events. Yes, we said majority and meant it... " (Bradley > apparently always used ?we,' though in reality he meant only himself.) > > Bradley answers his own statement with a statistical comeback, in part: > > *** " Using the synetic value for the 13 greatest earthquakes that occurred > in the world since 1900, Saturn is within two degrees of conjunction or > square the meridian of the epicenters seven times oftener than " chance " > would tend to allow. " *** > > Read this statement carefully: " ...seven times oftener than ?chance would > tend to allow'... " > > Only seven times more often? Shouldn't **every** major earthquake have a > powerful signature for its locale, especially if loss of life is extreme?? > IF the cyclic charts under study are valid.... > > Also 13 is too small a number to use for good statistical analysis. > > Bradley is giving us a hint here of how he determined the planetary > positions for rainfall. Using statistical analysis, the relevant planets > were in expected positions **more often than chance.** Unfortunately we > don't have the details of ?expected positions' for Bradley's research nor > how he determined these positions. > > I decided to test Bradley's statement about the random ayanamsa with two > events that have been discussed on this list: the heavy rains and snows > here in the mountains and the flooding in Prague in 1992 which Pingo talked > about. I'll talk about this in a second post. > > Therese > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2004 Report Share Posted January 12, 2004 Could we please have the full date of the Prague flooding. August hath 31 days. d*s mutombo wrote: > Hi Therese, > Just a small correction. The flooding in Prague occurred in August 2002 > instead of 1992. > > Cheers, > Pingo > > Therese Hamilton wrote: > > > BRADLEY AND THE AYANAMSA (Part 1) > > > > I hope I'm not he only one who checked out some of the articles recommended > > by Matthew Quellas. Here's one very interesting quote from Donald Bradley > > under " Anyanamsa. " (http://www.magee.demon.co.uk/ayanamsa.txt) > > > > " The point we are getting at here is that a randomly invented, wholly > > groundless ayanamsa will yield highly ?significant' ingress charts for a > > majority of events. Yes, we said majority and meant it... " (Bradley > > apparently always used ?we,' though in reality he meant only himself.) > > > > Bradley answers his own statement with a statistical comeback, in part: > > > > *** " Using the synetic value for the 13 greatest earthquakes that occurred > > in the world since 1900, Saturn is within two degrees of conjunction or > > square the meridian of the epicenters seven times oftener than " chance " > > would tend to allow. " *** > > > > Read this statement carefully: " ...seven times oftener than ?chance would > > tend to allow'... " > > > > Only seven times more often? Shouldn't **every** major earthquake have a > > powerful signature for its locale, especially if loss of life is extreme?? > > IF the cyclic charts under study are valid.... > > > > Also 13 is too small a number to use for good statistical analysis. > > > > Bradley is giving us a hint here of how he determined the planetary > > positions for rainfall. Using statistical analysis, the relevant planets > > were in expected positions **more often than chance.** Unfortunately we > > don't have the details of ?expected positions' for Bradley's research nor > > how he determined these positions. > > > > I decided to test Bradley's statement about the random ayanamsa with two > > events that have been discussed on this list: the heavy rains and snows > > here in the mountains and the flooding in Prague in 1992 which Pingo talked > > about. I'll talk about this in a second post. > > > > Therese > > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > > > Post message: > > Subscribe: - > > Un: - > > List owner: -owner > > > > Shortcut URL to this page: > > / > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2004 Report Share Posted January 13, 2004 The flooding culminated on 14.8.2002 shortly after noon(local time). Regards, Pingo - " Dark Star " <pansophia 12. ledna 2004 11:34 Re: Bradley and the Ayanamsa (Part 1) > > Could we please have the full date of the Prague flooding. August hath 31 days. > d*s > > mutombo wrote: > > > Hi Therese, > > Just a small correction. The flooding in Prague occurred in August 2002 > > instead of 1992. > > > > Cheers, > > Pingo > > > > Therese Hamilton wrote: > > > > > BRADLEY AND THE AYANAMSA (Part 1) > > > > > > I hope I'm not he only one who checked out some of the articles recommended > > > by Matthew Quellas. Here's one very interesting quote from Donald Bradley > > > under " Anyanamsa. " (http://www.magee.demon.co.uk/ayanamsa.txt) > > > > > > " The point we are getting at here is that a randomly invented, wholly > > > groundless ayanamsa will yield highly ?significant' ingress charts for a > > > majority of events. Yes, we said majority and meant it... " (Bradley > > > apparently always used ?we,' though in reality he meant only himself.) > > > > > > Bradley answers his own statement with a statistical comeback, in part: > > > > > > *** " Using the synetic value for the 13 greatest earthquakes that occurred > > > in the world since 1900, Saturn is within two degrees of conjunction or > > > square the meridian of the epicenters seven times oftener than " chance " > > > would tend to allow. " *** > > > > > > Read this statement carefully: " ...seven times oftener than ?chance would > > > tend to allow'... " > > > > > > Only seven times more often? Shouldn't **every** major earthquake have a > > > powerful signature for its locale, especially if loss of life is extreme?? > > > IF the cyclic charts under study are valid.... > > > > > > Also 13 is too small a number to use for good statistical analysis. > > > > > > Bradley is giving us a hint here of how he determined the planetary > > > positions for rainfall. Using statistical analysis, the relevant planets > > > were in expected positions **more often than chance.** Unfortunately we > > > don't have the details of ?expected positions' for Bradley's research nor > > > how he determined these positions. > > > > > > I decided to test Bradley's statement about the random ayanamsa with two > > > events that have been discussed on this list: the heavy rains and snows > > > here in the mountains and the flooding in Prague in 1992 which Pingo talked > > > about. I'll talk about this in a second post. > > > > > > Therese > > > > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > > > > > Post message: > > > Subscribe: - > > > Un: - > > > List owner: -owner > > > > > > Shortcut URL to this page: > > > / > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.