Camilla's Data: To Jen- Rationale of prediction

[Guest guest]

Alfonso , I am but a beginner , with my foot placed gingerly on the first rung

of the ladder of learning - I have a long way to go ! Jen .

-

alfonsoosorio

Monday, May 05, 2003 12:55 AM

Re: Camilla's Data: To Jen- Rationale of

prediction

 

 

 

Hello Jen. Sorry to disagree completely with you, but it seems to me

you are still under the influence of tropical astrology and what is

worst of solar astrology, when you are referring to them taking into

account only the sign placement of the sun. This is the only reason

why you can say that Camilla " is a cancer " and Diana " is a gemini " .

 

It is my opinion that this does not have any significance at all.

 

What it matters is the ascendant, secondly the moon's place and in

third place the sun. But mainly the overall chart.

 

The rationale of my prediction:

 

I learned to Mr Rao,a reknown hindu astrologer, to not divulgue

always the basis of our predictions.

 

Since I had always read silly things in this list, such as that the

houses do not work, I will not enter detailing which houses can be

considered as related to marriage.

 

It is your duty to find them, in case you want to learn astrology,

at least the hindu approach.

 

Alfonso Osorio

 

 

 

, " Jen " <jen@b...> wrote:

> Interesting , perhaps that both Diana & Camilla are tropical

Cancers , however , sidereally Diana becomes Gemini and Camilla stays

Cancer , what with Charles being Scorpio / Sagittarius ....

> -

> Therese Hamilton

>

> Monday, May 05, 2003 12:03 AM

> Camilla's Birth Data

>

>

> From the Rodden/McDonough AstroDatabase:

>

> Camilla Parker Bowles

> 7-17-1947 7:10 GDWT (+0:0) London, England 51N30 0W10

>

 

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Jen...

 

Enjoy your adventure... Being a beginner allows you

great freedom in making choices and choosing logical

directions within the confines of " astrology " .

 

Its much like learning a language or a particular

dialect of a language and you will constantly

encounter individuals with differing levels of logic

or for that matter, understanding of the subject

matter.

 

Challenge the " authorities " ... those that " know " what

they are talking about.... They are usually well

meaning but simply express their " own " particular

biased experience.

 

When you look at charts of individuals, transpose the

charts on one another... Look at the

interrelationships between the planets and the 4

angles(Campanus)... Look at natal charts in

relationship to each other but also to each others

progressed Charts.

I think you will find how each relationship is uniquly

" connected " and how the transits work their magic.

Time = viva la difference.

 

jivio

 

--- Jen <jen wrote:

> Alfonso , I am but a beginner , with my foot placed

> gingerly on the first rung of the ladder of learning

> - I have a long way to go ! Jen .

> -

> alfonsoosorio

>

> Monday, May 05, 2003 12:55 AM

> Re: Camilla's Data:

> To Jen- Rationale of prediction

>

>

>

> Hello Jen. Sorry to disagree completely with you,

> but it seems to me

> you are still under the influence of tropical

> astrology and what is

> worst of solar astrology, when you are referring

> to them taking into

> account only the sign placement of the sun. This

> is the only reason

> why you can say that Camilla " is a cancer " and

> Diana " is a gemini " .

>

> It is my opinion that this does not have any

> significance at all.

>

> What it matters is the ascendant, secondly the

> moon's place and in

> third place the sun. But mainly the overall chart.

>

> The rationale of my prediction:

>

> I learned to Mr Rao,a reknown hindu astrologer, to

> not divulgue

> always the basis of our predictions.

>

> Since I had always read silly things in this list,

> such as that the

> houses do not work, I will not enter detailing

> which houses can be

> considered as related to marriage.

>

> It is your duty to find them, in case you want to

> learn astrology,

> at least the hindu approach.

>

> Alfonso Osorio

>

>

>

> , " Jen "

> <jen@b...> wrote:

> > Interesting , perhaps that both Diana & Camilla

> are tropical

> Cancers , however , sidereally Diana becomes

> Gemini and Camilla stays

> Cancer , what with Charles being Scorpio /

> Sagittarius ....

> > -

> > Therese Hamilton

> >

> > Monday, May 05, 2003 12:03 AM

> > Camilla's Birth

> Data

> >

> >

> > From the Rodden/McDonough AstroDatabase:

> >

> > Camilla Parker Bowles

> > 7-17-1947 7:10 GDWT (+0:0) London, England

> 51N30 0W10

> >

>

> >

> >

> >