Guest guest Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 Did anyone besides me catch France 2 Television on C-Span this evening??!! What a different picture of the invasion--huge disorganized crowds, massive looting and burning, very, very angry citizens asking for their dictator back because the U.S. forces were doing nothing to stop the looting and destruction. I can't help but wonder how this broadcast got past the U.S. guardians. And does anyone want some evidence for the sidereal foundation of astrology? Compare the transits of the last few days to the Baghdad Foundation chart (762). Mars is in 0Gem23 minutes of Gemini in the 7th in that chart and at the time of Ambassador Al-Douri's peace statment in New York transiting Saturn had just entered Gemini at 0Deg16 minutes (Krishnamurti). There's a lot more. I'm going to put it on one of the Tropical boards. I have to find the URL for the Baghdad chart. It's on the C.U.R.A. site. Therese At 06:18 PM 4/11/03 -0700, you wrote: >I think that the majority of the list members are from or live in the States. So I thought it would be interesting for you to know how the rest of the world perceive the invasion of Irak. As I said before, although we didn't like or approved Husseim, most of the people of the world did not approved that invasion. We always saw that monetary and economical factors were the real cause of the attack. So far the american troops were not attacked with missils nor chemical weapons. So what was the threat that Saddam allegedly represented for the world peace? Isn't this a double moral of seeing things? And in > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 This is all fine, Alfonso, but where's the astrology?? Just for the record, the MAJORITY of Americans were against this war from the very beginning, and wanted our leaders to go the UN route so that everyone was on the same page. Our leaders ignored us, and the UN. This is not our war, but our politician's. Best, Ed K , alfonso osorio <alfonsoosorio> wrote: > I think that the majority of the list members are from or live in the States. So I thought it would be interesting for you to know how the rest of the world perceive the invasion of Irak. As I said before, although we didn't like or approved Husseim, most of the people of the world did not approved that invasion. We always saw that monetary and economical factors were the real cause of the attack. So far the american troops were not attacked with missils nor chemical weapons. So what was the threat that Saddam allegedly represented for the world peace? Isn't this a double moral of seeing things? And in relation to the tirannical and brutal way in which Saddam governed, let's remember that he was already a dictator when USA decided to back Irak in its war against Iran. But nobody mentioned his crimes when he was a convenient ally for USA. And the States did not do anything to prevent or to sanction Saddam when he killed a lot of kurds, with the use of chemical weapons. So it is really suspicious that only recently USA learned he was a dictator and a criminal. This has happened also with Ceaucescu in Rumany, Noriega in Panama, Stalin, Milosevic, and a lot of dictators, remember Vietnam?, who were accepted and even aided by USA until they stop serving or benefiting the american cause. It is really naive to belief that the countries operate by philantropic reasons. It is the economical factor that really moves then. In what I was wrong was in thinking that the americans would stop changing their mind about the war, as soon as they started seeing the scenes of the bombing in the TV. Recent polls confirm that all the americans back up fully their president and consequently Bush'es popularity has increased and will rise even more, when the money starts flowing from Irak to the States and specially to the Texan oil companies. Jupiter had been trining Bush ascendant and also the ascendant of the chart I use for USA. At least in this there is a little correspondence offered by astrology to this world event. But of course it will not suprise me if somebody says that his chart for USA is better because there is a 5 degree orb- trine between the tertiary progression of an asteroid named Bagh- Kurdy with the natal kyron of USA. I had seen a lot of arguments of this sort when they are defending the " exactitude " of their charts. My picture I had been lurking in astrological lists for some 5 years and always had tried to imagined the face of the other members with whom I had exchanged opinions. In case some of you have had the same concern I decided to show my picture. It is very probable that since I live in what is called a Third World country, probably you had thought that we are still living in the caves. Well, although we are not very developed by economical standards, life here has a lot of advantages, that you can understand only when you dare to visit our countries. But I don't know if it is possible to send an attachment. Anyway I try. Sincerely yours, Alfonso Osorio > > > > > Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 Which country do you live in Alphonso ? Jen. - alfonso osorio Saturday, April 12, 2003 2:18 AM Aftermath of Irak invasion- Picture I think that the majority of the list members are from or live in the States. So I thought it would be interesting for you to know how the rest of the world perceive the invasion of Irak. As I said before, although we didn't like or approved Husseim, most of the people of the world did not approved that invasion. We always saw that monetary and economical factors were the real cause of the attack. So far the american troops were not attacked with missils nor chemical weapons. So what was the threat that Saddam allegedly represented for the world peace? Isn't this a double moral of seeing things? And in relation to the tirannical and brutal way in which Saddam governed, let's remember that he was already a dictator when USA decided to back Irak in its war against Iran. But nobody mentioned his crimes when he was a convenient ally for USA. And the States did not do anything to prevent or to sanction Saddam when he killed a lot of kurds, with the use of chemical weapons. So it is really suspicious that only recently USA learned he was a dictator and a criminal. This has happened also with Ceaucescu in Rumany, Noriega in Panama, Stalin, Milosevic, and a lot of dictators, remember Vietnam?, who were accepted and even aided by USA until they stop serving or benefiting the american cause. It is really naive to belief that the countries operate by philantropic reasons. It is the economical factor that really moves then. In what I was wrong was in thinking that the americans would stop changing their mind about the war, as soon as they started seeing the scenes of the bombing in the TV. Recent polls confirm that all the americans back up fully their president and consequently Bush'es popularity has increased and will rise even more, when the money starts flowing from Irak to the States and specially to the Texan oil companies. Jupiter had been trining Bush ascendant and also the ascendant of the chart I use for USA. At least in this there is a little correspondence offered by astrology to this world event. But of course it will not suprise me if somebody says that his chart for USA is better because there is a 5 degree orb- trine between the tertiary progression of an asteroid named Bagh-Kurdy with the natal kyron of USA. I had seen a lot of arguments of this sort when they are defending the " exactitude " of their charts. My picture I had been lurking in astrological lists for some 5 years and always had tried to imagined the face of the other members with whom I had exchanged opinions. In case some of you have had the same concern I decided to show my picture. It is very probable that since I live in what is called a Third World country, probably you had thought that we are still living in the caves. Well, although we are not very developed by economical standards, life here has a lot of advantages, that you can understand only when you dare to visit our countries. But I don't know if it is possible to send an attachment. Anyway I try. Sincerely yours, Alfonso Osorio Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 To Ed: Although this is an astrological list,I think it is appropiate we occasionally give some comments about events that have a great importance for us as citizens and that affect our lives. Since I lack of data for Irak and Husseim, I can't make astrological comments. But even if I had them I don't like to practice POSTMORTEM astrology. Once the events happen, all is seen " clearly " . I made a slight reference for the july 4th chart, which always gives some clue. And finally, the polls prove that the majority of the americans back up what Bush did. And what is worst, they liked it so much, that even think Siria could deserve the same destiny since allegedly was aiding Irak. I never saw huge antiwar protests in the States, just a bunch of women and youngsters, usually from campus that like Berkeley had shown always a liberal trend. I live in Colombia. A country that has really suffered terrorism due to the presence of the only guerrilla group that remaiins in the world, when communism ended long ago. But these guerrillas do not even have idealistic purposes, they kidnap people for money and they trafic with arms and drugs. They are heavily armed and are very difficult to exterminate because they hide in the jungles, where no airplane can detect them. Fortunately it seems Bush will provide us some technical assistance to combat them. Alfonso Osorio , " Ed Kohout " <crumpo@e...> wrote: > This is all fine, Alfonso, but where's the astrology?? > > Just for the record, the MAJORITY of Americans were against this war > from the very beginning, and wanted our leaders to go the UN route so > that everyone was on the same page. > > Our leaders ignored us, and the UN. This is not our war, but our > politician's. > > Best, > Ed K > > > > , alfonso osorio > <alfonsoosorio> wrote: > > I think that the majority of the list members are from or live in > the States. So I thought it would be interesting for you to know how > the rest of the world perceive the invasion of Irak. As I said > before, although we didn't like or approved Husseim, most of the > people of the world did not approved that invasion. We always saw > that monetary and economical factors were the real cause of the > attack. So far the american troops were not attacked with missils nor > chemical weapons. So what was the threat that Saddam allegedly > represented for the world peace? Isn't this a double moral of seeing > things? And in relation to the tirannical and brutal way in which > Saddam governed, let's remember that he was already a dictator when > USA decided to back Irak in its war against Iran. But nobody > mentioned his crimes when he was a convenient ally for USA. And the > States did not do anything to prevent or to sanction Saddam when he > killed a lot of kurds, with the use of chemical weapons. So it is > really suspicious that only recently USA learned he was a dictator > and a criminal. This has happened also with Ceaucescu in Rumany, > Noriega in Panama, Stalin, Milosevic, and a lot of dictators, > remember Vietnam?, who were accepted and even aided by USA until they > stop serving or benefiting the american cause. It is really naive to > belief that the countries operate by philantropic reasons. It is the > economical factor that really moves then. In what I was wrong was in > thinking that the americans would stop changing their mind about the > war, as soon as they started seeing the scenes of the bombing in the > TV. Recent polls confirm that all the americans back up fully their > president and consequently Bush'es popularity has increased and will > rise even more, when the money starts flowing from Irak to the States > and specially to the Texan oil companies. Jupiter had been trining > Bush ascendant and also the ascendant of the chart I use for USA. At > least in this there is a little correspondence offered by astrology > to this world event. But of course it will not suprise me if somebody > says that his chart for USA is better because there is a 5 degree orb- > trine between the tertiary progression of an asteroid named Bagh- > Kurdy with the natal kyron of USA. I had seen a lot of arguments of > this sort when they are defending the " exactitude " of their charts. > My picture I had been lurking in astrological lists for some 5 years > and always had tried to imagined the face of the other members with > whom I had exchanged opinions. In case some of you have had the same > concern I decided to show my picture. It is very probable that since > I live in what is called a Third World country, probably you had > thought that we are still living in the caves. Well, although we are > not very developed by economical standards, life here has a lot of > advantages, that you can understand only when you dare to visit our > countries. But I don't know if it is possible to send an attachment. > Anyway I try. Sincerely yours, Alfonso Osorio > > > > > > > > > > Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 Alfonso, it's true that if we saw accuracy in the polls, that more than half of U.S. citizens--50 to 75 percent--supported their president. (I question the polls, but that is another story.) However, it isn't true that there were few demonstrators that were mainly women and children near college campuses. Many demonstrations in the big cities numbered hundreds of thousands, as reported in the newspapers and on television. Hundreds were arrested by police, mostly for blocking busy streets. There was some vandalism, however. Even the small towns like the one I live in have a few hundred people turning out for peace demonstrations. We have a valid historical chart for the foundation of Baghdad. Why not make your predictions? http://cura.free.fr/xxv/25hold3.html Spelling in English: Iraq Syria Sincerely, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 Therese: I would like to believe that polls are inexact or that the majority of the americans were against the war, but I always pledge to reality, and by the way, when the polls are made under scientific procedure, they can reflect exactly what people think. Another different thing is that another war is being celebrated in the media, the informative war. You all appreciated that many times the news were influenced by depending on which side they were supporting or based on their political color. For example the tv was lying when they said all the iraqis were celebrating when Saddam's statue was thrown down. Besides the american soldiers, there were only some few curious people and the reporters, but it was not true that all the Baghdad population went to the street to celebrate it. And finally, I had not read the article that gives the data for Baghdad's foundation. I doubt it reflects the real birth of the city, but even conceding it is accurate, it is important to differentiate a city than of a nation or a political regime. Although the city of Baghdad is under anarchy and have no rulers and consequently its population is the victim of vandalism, what was at stake was Irak's system of government. And astrologically this could be reflected only in the chart for Irak and for the moment when Saddam grabbed the power. These were and are the key data, which we all lack. So I don't understand what predictions could be made from the city's chart, in case it exists. Alfonso Osorio , Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> wrote: > Alfonso, it's true that if we saw accuracy in the polls, that more than > half of U.S. citizens--50 to 75 percent--supported their president. (I > question the polls, but that is another story.) However, it isn't true that > there were few demonstrators that were mainly women and children near > college campuses. Many demonstrations in the big cities numbered hundreds > of thousands, as reported in the newspapers and on television. Hundreds > were arrested by police, mostly for blocking busy streets. There was some > vandalism, however. Even the small towns like the one I live in have a few > hundred people turning out for peace demonstrations. > > We have a valid historical chart for the foundation of Baghdad. Why not > make your predictions? > > http://cura.free.fr/xxv/25hold3.html > > Spelling in English: Iraq Syria > > Sincerely, > Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 At 10:57 PM 4/12/03 -0000, Alfonso wrote: And finally, I had not read the article that gives the data for >Baghdad's foundation. I doubt it reflects the real birth of the city, >but even conceding it is accurate, it is important to differentiate a >city than of a nation or a political regime. Since Baghdad is the capital city of Iraq and the seat of government, I believe that predictions can be made from that chart. If you read the article, you will see that the time was purposely chosen and recorded. Also the current transits to the chart check out. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2003 Report Share Posted April 16, 2003 , Therese Hamilton <eastwest@s...> wrote: > At 10:57 PM 4/12/03 -0000, Alfonso wrote: > > And finally, I had not read the article that gives the data for > >Baghdad's foundation. I doubt it reflects the real birth of the city, > >but even conceding it is accurate, it is important to differentiate a > >city than of a nation or a political regime. Alfonso, How can you say that this was not the foundation without reading the article? Guessing (in this case wrongly!) is afoul of good deduction. > > Since Baghdad is the capital city of Iraq and the seat of government, I > believe that predictions can be made from that chart. If you read the > article, you will see that the time was purposely chosen and recorded. Also > the current transits to the chart check out. Yes, indeed. Notice how it jives with the Sibly chart, and the current Saturn transit to both charts' Mars. While such a city chart is poor for predicting the war, it is indicitave of the fortunes of the city in general. Right now, I would say that things are going poorly. - Ed K > > Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.