Guest guest Posted May 6, 2003 Report Share Posted May 6, 2003 I don't know about the " Honest " sidereal astrologers but the sidereal astrology I'm familiar with has a number of fiducial stars. The initial point of this " sidereal " zodiac is 35 degrees from the Pleiades, 45 degrees from Aldebaran, 125 degrees from Regulus and 179 degrees from Spica. jivio --- Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: > At 01:22 PM 5/5/03 -0000, Jesse M. wrote: > > > >It's true that at the present time, we don't know > the true fiducial of the > sidereal zodiac, so all we can do until we discover > it is approximate it by > measuring against the stars. > > I think any honest sidereal astrologer would have to > agree with this > statement. > > T. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2003 Report Share Posted May 6, 2003 At 03:57 PM 5/5/03 -0700, Jivio wrote: >I don't know about the " Honest " sidereal astrologers >but the sidereal astrology I'm familiar with has a >number of fiducial stars. The initial point of this > " sidereal " zodiac is 35 degrees from the Pleiades, 45 >degrees from Aldebaran, 125 degrees from Regulus and >179 degrees from Spica. Where is the proof that this was THE early sidereal zodiac? And what about the latitude of these stars? They will shift in relation to the horizon because they're not on the ecliptic--except for Spica. As I've asked before on this list, how would you show in actual chart work that this is THE zodiac? T. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.