Guest guest Posted January 19, 2003 Report Share Posted January 19, 2003 Dear All! Is it not right to think, technique and experiences on astrology in Persia was all based on sidereal in the time of akasic records. It is said it was a combination of sidereal and tropical zodiac; there was no difference then. The equinox was even in Taurus in accordance to aritmatic reckonings. Tropical astrologers have been forced to be creative in their practice of delination since the facts did not accord with the rules of delineation, as was taught to them. The difference has grown to great now and they simply do not recognize this.The practice of old considerations like the prominence, weakness and critical degrees in the zodiac does not suite these astrologers anymore. Others leave the whole theory astrology. Indeed we (siderealists) enlarge our knowledge by new experiences and discoveries in astrology, but the basis, the sidereal zodiac, is our frame of reference and based on arithmetic observation. Tropicalists have fixed in mind:that the practicing the sidereal zodiac in based on another " system " . If they loose their own " system " they are nowhere. They might learn here, but my hope is flown away after 11 years of patience with proves. Hostile reproach here, as is done before in Alt Astrology with tropical and sidereal minded members feels alike intruding ennemies at your weddingparty. Regards! Anny / ------ Dr. Starman http://www.DrStarman.net > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.