Guest guest Posted January 15, 2003 Report Share Posted January 15, 2003 I am not going to play the soldier for too much longer by accepting all the blame for what has well be documented as antisocial personality disorder. Although, Ed has a good mind his behavior is beginning to get into areas of being a serious threat. he stiffles any creativity in others. He projects his breakdown of mechanical functions on the objects of his rage. I thought I was out of line and may have been the source of the problem at first but now he has attacked another new person using much of the same regurgitated techno-babble he has always used. Most of his posts fall into the category of linguistic fallacies or unintelligible arguments simply on the grounds that he refuses to use vocabulary that his audience can grasp. Example:The Incandescent Absolute involutedly evolves with ontological gyrations: therefore all mankind is condemned to the eternal now of groundless freedom. Let's face it Ed, the world does not have a Master's degree and I am much smarter than your over-confident meglomania would ever allow you to admit. Lets not even get into the stereotyped charges he makes on everyone soley on the basis that they don't have a master's degree. I have a life. I have fiance that is pre-med and I pay her tuition before I pay mine. I could careless if I don't have my PH.D by 25 like Mr. Ed. I learned how to treat people with kindness, dignity and respect instead of performing a bloody coup in my quest for ambitious academic glory. Finally, I am sorry that the unexplained and the unproven has in Ed's stuffy experience with his Harvard and Princeton collegues caused him to have this morbid fascination with materialism and he feels the burden of having to prove everything. Get a life, get a woman and get a clue. I am sick and tired of this bully. How much longer are the members of this group going to tolerate being talked to like trailor park trash before the mediators realize what a jerk he is? How many people are you going to lose in this association of astrological minds just to keep a creep with credentials? Wake up, he is no good for anyone in here. O---------------------Damon---------------------O O---------------------Damon Parker--------------------O O--------------Damon, Damon, Damon--------------O Terese Hamilton <eastwest wrote:At 12:43 PM 1/13/03 -0800, Damon wrote: > >I'm sorry Terese but I am just about fed up with that bully, Mr ED. If the two of you want to go at it, it should be via private e-mail and not on a public discussion board. All you're both doing is giving a terrific picture of the worst that Tropical Scorpio has to offer (the second half of the sign....the claws of the Scorpion nowadays called the constellation of Libra. Dear Mr. Fagan, the constellation of Libra (the latter third of the sign of Sidereal Libra) is not peaceful, as I've said before. And for the record, I delete all those posts without reading them. Terese " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 I am a tropical Scorpio (2nd half : 10/11/54.06.00GMT.) however,upon quickly reading through Damon & Ed's posts I find them occasionally amusing but mostly irritating.I am in the latter third of sidereal Libra and although I always strive for peace ( how I hate disharmony in any form! ) I am not so sure that I am actually a peaceful person ! I would like to get a sidereal chart drawn up,where do I go?could anyone here do this for me? Kind Regards Jen. - The Game Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:13 PM Make no mistake these are Damon's words from Damon's e-mail acount I am not going to play the soldier for too much longer by accepting all the blame for what has well be documented as antisocial personality disorder. Although, Ed has a good mind his behavior is beginning to get into areas of being a serious threat. he stiffles any creativity in others. He projects his breakdown of mechanical functions on the objects of his rage. I thought I was out of line and may have been the source of the problem at first but now he has attacked another new person using much of the same regurgitated techno-babble he has always used. Most of his posts fall into the category of linguistic fallacies or unintelligible arguments simply on the grounds that he refuses to use vocabulary that his audience can grasp. Example:The Incandescent Absolute involutedly evolves with ontological gyrations: therefore all mankind is condemned to the eternal now of groundless freedom. Let's face it Ed, the world does not have a Master's degree and I am much smarter than your over-confident meglomania would ever allow you to admit. Lets not even get into the stereotyped charges he makes on everyone soley on the basis that they don't have a master's degree. I have a life. I have fiance that is pre-med and I pay her tuition before I pay mine. I could careless if I don't have my PH.D by 25 like Mr. Ed. I learned how to treat people with kindness, dignity and respect instead of performing a bloody coup in my quest for ambitious academic glory. Finally, I am sorry that the unexplained and the unproven has in Ed's stuffy experience with his Harvard and Princeton collegues caused him to have this morbid fascination with materialism and he feels the burden of having to prove everything. Get a life, get a woman and get a clue. I am sick and tired of this bully. How much longer are the members of this group going to tolerate being talked to like trailor park trash before the mediators realize what a jerk he is? How many people are you going to lose in this association of astrological minds just to keep a creep with credentials? Wake up, he is no good for anyone in here. O---------------------Damon---------------------O O---------------------Damon Parker--------------------O O--------------Damon, Damon, Damon--------------O Terese Hamilton <eastwest wrote:At 12:43 PM 1/13/03 -0800, Damon wrote: > >I'm sorry Terese but I am just about fed up with that bully, Mr ED. If the two of you want to go at it, it should be via private e-mail and not on a public discussion board. All you're both doing is giving a terrific picture of the worst that Tropical Scorpio has to offer (the second half of the sign....the claws of the Scorpion nowadays called the constellation of Libra. Dear Mr. Fagan, the constellation of Libra (the latter third of the sign of Sidereal Libra) is not peaceful, as I've said before. And for the record, I delete all those posts without reading them. Terese " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2003 Report Share Posted January 16, 2003 I have recently found a program called Janus that will do sidereal charts. So I know how to do them with descriptions written by the author of the program o---------Damon------------o Black Cat PC Solutions <jen wrote:I am a tropical Scorpio (2nd half : 10/11/54.06.00GMT.) however,upon quickly reading through Damon & Ed's posts I find them occasionally amusing but mostly irritating.I am in the latter third of sidereal Libra and although I always strive for peace ( how I hate disharmony in any form! ) I am not so sure that I am actually a peaceful person ! I would like to get a sidereal chart drawn up,where do I go?could anyone here do this for me? Kind Regards Jen. - The Game Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:13 PM Make no mistake these are Damon's words from Damon's e-mail acount I am not going to play the soldier for too much longer by accepting all the blame for what has well be documented as antisocial personality disorder. Although, Ed has a good mind his behavior is beginning to get into areas of being a serious threat. he stiffles any creativity in others. He projects his breakdown of mechanical functions on the objects of his rage. I thought I was out of line and may have been the source of the problem at first but now he has attacked another new person using much of the same regurgitated techno-babble he has always used. Most of his posts fall into the category of linguistic fallacies or unintelligible arguments simply on the grounds that he refuses to use vocabulary that his audience can grasp. Example:The Incandescent Absolute involutedly evolves with ontological gyrations: therefore all mankind is condemned to the eternal now of groundless freedom. Let's face it Ed, the world does not have a Master's degree and I am much smarter than your over-confident meglomania would ever allow you to admit. Lets not even get into the stereotyped charges he makes on everyone soley on the basis that they don't have a master's degree. I have a life. I have fiance that is pre-med and I pay her tuition before I pay mine. I could careless if I don't have my PH.D by 25 like Mr. Ed. I learned how to treat people with kindness, dignity and respect instead of performing a bloody coup in my quest for ambitious academic glory. Finally, I am sorry that the unexplained and the unproven has in Ed's stuffy experience with his Harvard and Princeton collegues caused him to have this morbid fascination with materialism and he feels the burden of having to prove everything. Get a life, get a woman and get a clue. I am sick and tired of this bully. How much longer are the members of this group going to tolerate being talked to like trailor park trash before the mediators realize what a jerk he is? How many people are you going to lose in this association of astrological minds just to keep a creep with credentials? Wake up, he is no good for anyone in here. O---------------------Damon---------------------O O---------------------Damon Parker--------------------O O--------------Damon, Damon, Damon--------------O Terese Hamilton <eastwest wrote:At 12:43 PM 1/13/03 -0800, Damon wrote: > >I'm sorry Terese but I am just about fed up with that bully, Mr ED. If the two of you want to go at it, it should be via private e-mail and not on a public discussion board. All you're both doing is giving a terrific picture of the worst that Tropical Scorpio has to offer (the second half of the sign....the claws of the Scorpion nowadays called the constellation of Libra. Dear Mr. Fagan, the constellation of Libra (the latter third of the sign of Sidereal Libra) is not peaceful, as I've said before. And for the record, I delete all those posts without reading them. Terese " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.