Guest guest Posted January 10, 2003 Report Share Posted January 10, 2003 Message: 3 Wed, 08 Jan 2003 03:38:10 -0000 " Ed Kohout <crumpo " <crumpo Re: Digest Number 444, Anny I honestly have no idea what you mean about putting the computer beside the television to prove the sidereal zodiac. I wonder if you can explain to me why Mars is a better planet at 29*59' Capricorn than 00*01' Aquarius?? Dear Ed The computer (+ astrology-program)is in the same room here So I follow news and interesting features with astrology. The current positions + feature (talkshow, interview) parallel radix chart of person to be interviewed is sometimes interesting to follow. History too is interesting that way: Sun ingres par example. Concerning Mars in 29°59 Capricorn or Aquarius 00°01' is indeed not much difference; but Mars in Capricorn is conjunct a fixed star of the nature Saturnus-Jupiter : Dignified, pious, conservative, acquisitive, retentive. Honour and preferment if culminating. The next conjunction with a fixed star would be 11° Aquarius.Fixed stars are considered influental only when they are exact. Some one here, I do not recall who, moved Mars on a degree. I experimented with a chart the Krishnamurti zodiac. It takes time indeed to be able to make up my mind about the value. Only I object to read in one sentence of an email two sorts of zodiacs. I am certain tropical astrologers neither. Have a nice weekend, Anny Aquarius ______________________ ______________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2003 Report Share Posted January 10, 2003 , " Anny van Berckel " <avbdk@x> wrote: > Message: 3 > Wed, 08 Jan 2003 03:38:10 -0000 > " Ed Kohout <crumpo@e...> " <crumpo@e...> > Re: Digest Number 444, Anny > > I honestly have no idea what you mean about putting the computer > beside the television to prove the sidereal zodiac. > > I wonder if you can explain to me why Mars is a better planet at > 29*59' Capricorn than 00*01' Aquarius?? > > Dear Ed > > The computer (+ astrology-program)is in the same room here > So I follow news and interesting features with astrology. > The current positions + feature (talkshow, interview) parallel > radix chart of person to be interviewed is sometimes interesting > to follow. Hi Anny, I can't begin to count the problems with relying on the TV for the best quality of information, but for live events, I suppose this medium (and radio) has the advantage. Why don't you read newspapers? > History too is interesting that way: Sun ingres par example. Care to explain this?? > Concerning Mars in 29°59 Capricorn or Aquarius 00°01' is indeed > not much difference; but Mars in Capricorn is conjunct a fixed star > of the nature Saturnus-Jupiter : Dignified, pious, conservative, > acquisitive, retentive. Honour and preferment if culminating. The > next conjunction with a fixed star would be 11° Aquarius.Fixed stars > are considered influental only when they are exact. What fixed star? There are a lot of fixed stars between 29 Cap and 11 Aqu, so I am bewildered as to what you mean, unless you have some sort of brightness limit. I am glad that you have admitted that there is no difference between Mars a 29*59' and 00*01'. - Ed K > Some one here, I do not recall who, moved Mars on a degree. I > experimented with a chart the Krishnamurti zodiac. It takes time indeed > to be able to make up my mind about the value. > Only I object to read in one sentence of an email two sorts of > zodiacs. I am certain tropical astrologers neither. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.