Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 > *******Well, I see there are a few grown-ups here, so I still look forward > to some intelligent conversation. Haven't seen any yet, but... > In a message dated 12/17/2002 7:43:29 PM Central Standard Time, > DRStarman2001 writes: > >Well, one can always hope that snotty responses are not the level of > >discussion for an Internet group; we'll have to see if this sort of > asinine > >insulting of people is the norm here > > WHO ARE YOU, and WHAT do you mean INSULTING . . . ASININE . . . ? And > since > when does being " an internet group " signify anything but its name? You're > the > one who came into the SIDEREAL GROUP with the latest umpteen systems crap > as > if we've never heard it all a million times before. You have yet to exhibit > a > speck of humor. and you expect people on this list to sit idly by while > you > surreptitiously insult us with your condescending attitude, " brilliant " > dissertations, and impeccable english grammar and vocabulary? YOU are the > person who was so insulted when others in this list responded to so much > hogwash in your posts early this week (was it only yesterday? or the 16th). > > So why don't you have a laugh (at yourself) and see the AD HOMINEM [sic] in > > your own ignorance of what it means to join a sidereal group list. We like > > the western sidereal system. Most of us use it exclusively and those who do > > not are rarely argumentative about it; I think they're here because they're > > lovers of the art. But every once in a while, some fathead from ancient > babble-onia jumps into the group and starts slinging the same old crap . . > . > then these same babble-onians get all weepy and parsimonious when someone > in > the group tells them " no thanks - butt out. " I am NEVER embarrassed by ANY > > degrogatory remark hurled my way by tropical astrologers. I'm only > embarrassed for them, and piqued by the gall of their nerve for calling my > science black. I repeat my earlier opening: THIS IS A SIDEREAL GROUP. > We'd > LOVE to hear your latest stroke of brilliance vis a vis the sidereal system > > of Fagan/Bradley et al; but of course you have none. After all, it is in > their memory (also Gleadow, Brigadere Firebrace, Mary Austin, John Mazurek > et > al) that MOST of us continue on this path. Otherwise . . . we've heard it > all vis a vis the following systems: tropical, bagelonian [sic], eminemic > [sic], hypothermorphic [sic], transylvishnu [sic] and > stupidcalefragalisticexpialidocious [sic] (i may have missed feznusian > [sic]). So in all seriosity [sic] - - - since we've heard it all before -- > > and you've apparently known it all for EVER: Shaddup [sic]. Nobody cares > if > anybody's righter than right . . . but curiouser and curiouser? Maybe. > Myself . . . I've run into so many of you that i've nearly run out of > retorts > (with the present posting being a retort of last resort I might add). I > didn't join this group to be insulted simply by informing a post-er (poser) > > (you) that this is a sidereal group, so one should not be surprised if > one's > tropical blahblahs are belittled. Actually, your posts remind me of > every-other tropicalist i've ever met; it's not a pretty memory and i don't > > appreciate being sucked back in time -- especially whilst enjoying a > Sidereal > discussion loop -- by any such as you, so please save your admonitions for > somebody else. (And please don't review my current post using a grammarian > or > book of style; there is no book of style for my kinda [sic] prose.) This > is > a SIDEREAL GROUP and if you wanna [sic] argue here please accept my > crocodile > tears. Sign me . . . snotty, immature, poorly-bred, asinine, moronic or > whatever pleases you. //// Chris Paul Wing /// Age 58.99 /// siderealist > since 1968 /// Austin Texas /// P.S. If any of our long-standing posters > find > this-here [sic] post inappropriate, y'all [sic] please whisper amongst > yourselves. I don' [sic] care! PS PS -- not coincidentally, my current > lunar > return of 12/15/02 has mars/venus libra asc opp natal moon, with jupiter in > > mc cancer opp neptune. Needless to say, this is perfect weather for > arguing. > But as always, the blunder is ever-ready here. Believe it or not everyone, > I > am a pacifist! /// cw http://www.DrStarman.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.