Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 , Terese Hamilton scripts: > Think about it: It's totally illogical to think that one area of the > ecliptic (i.e. sign of the zodiac) has two different meanings depending on > whether that sign is Tropical or Sidereal. Or, it could mean that such meanings derived from signs in any zodiac are useless. The Cosmobiologists stopped using signs generations ago, knowing that such generalizations were not worth a darn, as they led to the use of rulerships schemes that were based upon the misreading of the ancient texts. The notion that someone's Mars is " in " something that has artificial boundaries, such as " Libra, " means nothing in and of itself. Mars' mathematical and geometric relationships to other planets is what defines Mars in the chart in the progressive fields of astrology. The only valid argument of whether sidereal is better to use than tropical rests with wether we use precession or not in our delineations. - Ed K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2002 Report Share Posted December 18, 2002 At 09:15 PM 12/18/02 -0000, Ed K wrote: >Or, it could mean that such meanings derived from signs in any zodiac >are useless. Compared to the power of the planets, the influence of the signs is pale by comparison. But try working with the sign dispositors of the planets in natal charts. >The only valid argument of whether sidereal is better to use than >tropical rests with wether we use precession or not in our >delineations. That is, in solar and lunar return charts. Yes, these charts are the easist way to demonstrate the effects of precession/non-precession. This is why Robert Hand essentially uses sidereal return charts. Terese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2002 Report Share Posted December 19, 2002 , Terese Hamilton > Compared to the power of the planets, the influence of the signs is pale by > comparison. But try working with the sign dispositors of the planets in > natal charts. Hi Terese, Believe me, when I was learning astrology, I tried all these different rulership schemes, and found them to be rather silly, no matter what zodiac I was using. The outer three planets' rulerships are even more silly, as are their exaltations and falls. Mars square Venus is the same no matter what signs they are in. > >The only valid argument of whether sidereal is better to use than > >tropical rests with wether we use precession or not in our > >delineations. > > That is, in solar and lunar return charts. Yes, these charts are the easist > way to demonstrate the effects of precession/non-precession. This is why > Robert Hand essentially uses sidereal return charts. Yeah, this seems to be the best method according to some prominent astrologers. Best regards, Ed K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.