Guest guest Posted April 15, 2002 Report Share Posted April 15, 2002 In a recent Uranus to Mars transit I had I noted that I was very unsure of whether I should move or not, but decided to go with the aspect and move. It turned out to be not the right thing to do and further more I am now stuck where I dont want to be. Although I knew the aspect was not good, I went along with the energy, apparently unaware of the nature of the aspect. I did things that were completely unlike me and then lived to regret it. I got hurt both physically and emotiionally. Let this be a warning about this aspect. It is very dangerous! Royale wrote: > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > ------ > > There is 1 message in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. are you using all your potenciality ? > " astroshambu " <astroshambu > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > Message: 1 > Sat, 13 Apr 2002 05:45:18 -0000 > " astroshambu " <astroshambu > are you using all your potenciality ? > > Are you using your planets or the planets are using you? > Part 1 > > By Bhadra Dasi. > > The planets themselves are not auspicious or inauspicious ,but they > are indicators of our past activities, we have the potentiality to be > CAUSE over the planets we have in our natal chart, or we can be > effect of them. If we elevate ourselves up toward sattva-guna (the > mode of goodness) we are cause more and more, but if instead we go > down to tamo-guna (the mode of ignorance) then in that measure we are > effect (passive) of our planets. Here we have a gradient scale > composed by levels with their own characteristics which are > manifested in a progressive manner (from A, to I, ). These qualities > are indicating some general symptoms of how is the influence of the > corresponding planet or, at which level we are using the planets that > are related to specific realms in our life. > > In different periods of our life or, even in our day time, we are > acting on a specific level which can be easily ascertained by many > symptoms. > > This is the range in which this gradient scale is related with the > Gunas (modes of material nature): > > A is Sattva-guna (mode of goodness) > > B is Sattva mixed with a little Rajo-guna > > C and D are Rajasic (the mode of passion) mainly > > E and F are Rajo mixed with Tamo-guna > > G,H and I are in Tamo-guna (the mode of ignorance) > > Gradient scale of the Gunas related to the planets. > > Gradients scale of Venus (Shukra). > > This planet rules over love and affinity. We can define this word as > a consideration of distance, of how much we feel near or far from a > person. This obviously does not mean physical distance for we have > seen many times that people which is physically " near " are not so > near in reality. > > A) On this level one is able to express love and to receive it freely > and > not maliciously. > B) Here the person is tolerant, he accepts (until some limit) the > advances > offered by others but does not readily make such advances > himself. > C) In this level the individual is negligent toward people in > general. He try > to avoid them. > D) At this level the persons feel anger or irritation caused by the > advances of other people toward him, displays of love are received > with suspicion. > E) Here are hate or violent acts. > F) At this level the person, no longer, dares demonstrate hate as > such. This is the level of covert hostility, this person may claim to > love others or to act for others good, but, consciously, his acts are > meant to injure, manipulate or damage the others, is like an actor, > all manner of subterfuges may be resorted to. > G) Here the person is in fear and he will attempt to buy off the > imagined danger by propitiation (the act of appeasing). > H) In this level the individual is in grief, his desperate efforts to > win support by tears, supplications, pleas for pity, strange > perversions of truth intended to achieve the pity and win support of > others. > I) On this level there is no real attempt to contact one's self and > no attempt to contact others, this level is on the threshold of death. > > Gradient scale of Saturn (Shani). > > This planet rules over reality. > > A) Here is the person who accepts as a fact of love the reality and > confronts it as it is. He can search different viewpoints and thus he > can broaden his own reality. He has a complete flexibility and > understanding in relating and evaluating different realities. > B) This level is characterized by moderated flexibility about > realities brought to view, without eager search for new ones, or he > will try to reconcile his own reality with conflicting realities. > C) Here the person is aware of the possible validity of diverse > realities but he will not relate this to his own reality. > D) At this level the individual is indifferent to polemical > realities, and his attitude is: " maybe " or " who cares? " > E) Here the person attempts to undermine the reality of others, is > critical, he wants the destruction of opposing realities, by denial > or violence, verbal and even physical; refuses to accept conflicting > realities without trying to fight back. > F) On this level the person has insecurity, or attempts to gain > reassurance from others. > G) Here the person has strong doubt of one's reality and thus is not > able to act within it. He does not act without others telling him > what to do. Fear of acting on himself. > H) On this level there is denying the conflicting realities and total > refuses to acknowledge the existence of any reality but one's owns, > in which one is rigidly locked. > I) At this level, the only reality is death. > > Gradient scale of Mars (Kuja). > > This planet rules over confrontation. > > A) At this level the person have high courage level. > B) Here the person has moderate displayed of courage when the risk is > small. > C) Neither courage nor cowardice but a definite neglect of danger. > D) Instead of courage we have " bravery " > E) Here we have cowardice implied in covert hostility. > Complete cowardice. Defeat. > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.