Guest guest Posted March 29, 2002 Report Share Posted March 29, 2002 There has been alot of research done on the subject by Cyril Fagan.Read his book to be convinced or do it by your own research. Royale wrote: > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > ------ > > There are 2 messages in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. Re: Tropical Taurus/Sidereal Aries > " olivierparis26 " <olivierparis26 > 2. Re: Re: Tropical Taurus/Sidereal Aries > Dee Parker <sher_e_khan > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > Message: 1 > Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:05:02 -0000 > " olivierparis26 " <olivierparis26 > Re: Tropical Taurus/Sidereal Aries > > Hi, > > I have learned astrology through the tropical basis and totally > satisfied with it. I don't understand the point of sideral Astrology. > The sign are clearly linked to the symbolism of the Light of the Sun > during a year. Energy coming on Spring (Day>Night), Capricorn being > the point where the Light rises again (Day beginning to increase), > etc. > Someone neglecting the tropical sings would neglect one of the main > part of the astrological symbolism... > > However, tropcial astrology is totally neglecting the value of stars, > constellations in an horoscop. There has to be a place for them, > explaining the fact that just changing 1° of a sign is changing the > whole energy, destiny and characters of the person even if the main > strucure (solar system) remain stable. > I think this is what " degrees " of an horoscop are all about. > > So there is a research needed here. > > Remarks : > > > Here's the problem in the Tropical zodiac: How can easy-going > cooperative, > > friendly relationship-oriented Venus be said to rule a sign which is > > persistent, strong willed and content to be by itself? > > ...Taurus is linked with possession...It is the energy of the first > sign (aries) willing to rest, to find some piece, some pleasure. It > is the sign ruling the appetite for food and sex. The relation to the > outside world, teh material world, incarnation as a living principle. > No need to say that Venus is very welcome here as the planet of > Incarnation. (for your way of seeing Venus, just look at libra, the > second master) > > Moreover it is only natural that a sign symbolsim and its master > symbolism have differences. They are not operating in the same fields. > > As the Moon's > > exaltation sign, Tropical Taurus doesn't fare any better. The Moon > is said > > to rule change, cycles and fluctuation. Tropical astrology can say > that the > > Moon is stabilized in Taurus, but then the Moon is turned into > another > > planet and its innate symbolism is lost. > > You cannot understand a symbolsim if you are just chosing to take a > part of it, just words. > The Moon is the planet of the link with the Mother. Even if > fluctuent, it is a planet symbolising a one and only link with the > outside world, as some kind of fusion and coolness. A planet linked > with the material part of man, the body, the physical life. > Here again, the link is obvious when you get to feel the desire of > Taurus and the Symbolism of the Moon. > > Olivier > > ______________________ > ______________________ > > Message: 2 > Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:34:48 -0800 (PST) > Dee Parker <sher_e_khan > Re: Re: Tropical Taurus/Sidereal Aries > > I'm not exactly sure what you are asking. It seems that you are denial of the facts that siderealist have come to realize. Astrology is based on the stars. If you do not gaze at the stars as a basis for mapping the charts, if you use some scientific formula that you got from a book authored by the New York Times astrology column writer, then you are not an astrologer. You are fooling yourself. > > If you observe the mentality and behavior throughout the life of a tropical Taurus' you will find that they bear little resemblance to the sweet, docile, passive soul that is described in those words. Once again, I use as example Adolf Hitler, Al Pacino, The Rock, Jet Lee, and Malcolm X. I ask you now, where is that sweetness? Where is that bondage to the material world? What happened to the passivity? > > > > Greetings - send greetings for Easter, Passover > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.