Lost post?

[Guest guest]

It seems that my response to post 709 has been lost so I am repostng

it.

 

, bwfannin@e... wrote:

> Refr:02020603

> Send:D:\Email\bin\02020604.sal

> Wednesday, February 06, 2002

>

> > > ... I have many of your articles in the 29 year collection of

> > > American Astrology that I have, along with all of the articles

> > > by other Siderealists printed in that magazine, and books by

> > > Fagan, Bradley, and Stahl.

>

> Well it is nice to know that my stuff is read, even

> collected.

 

The statement clearly states that American Astrology Magazine was

collected, not your articles.

 

>If you have all of the works by all of the Siderealists,

 

It is further clearly stated that the articles I have were the ones

printed in that collection of magazines. I did not claim to " have all

of the works by all of the Siderealists, " , please do not try to

rewrite my post.

 

> then you are aware that Ken Bowser published an article on

> progressing the Lunar Return using this method quite a few years

> ago.

>

Bowsers' article was in the First Anniversary issue of Siderealist

Magazine and is not the same method. Steps 6 and 7 in the article

clearly show that he uses the RAAS which my programs for progressing

lunar returns do not do. Please do not make any further statements

like the one above which make it appear as though I plagerized

someone else's work.

 

> > Well it has been 3 weeks and no such response. It does not take

> > much of ones time to respond to one post. We all fritter away

> > more time than it takes to make such a response. It seems like

> > all that was wanted was " How do you do it? " , and I freely gave

> > the information.

>

> Calm yourself please. I realize I have little or nothing to

do but

> respond to your posts.

 

Please do not belittle yourslf by using condescending language like

the above. It proves no superiority.

 

>But in fact I do. I am in the middle of

> getting out the Constellations. I have decided that the question of

> progressions and the 9/11 terrorist disaster is interesting enough

> to warrant an article on the subject. I have decided to forgo my

> usual Lunar Ingress report and concentrate on 9/11, testing out the

> several progressions methods, including Bowser's Lunar

> Progression.

> I have just finished editing the feature piece for the February

> Constellation and am working on the second piece. I am also

> starting

> to work up that Ingress study. So you will forgive me if I do not

> drop everything and engage in a long and detailed response to your

> post.

>

You emailed me that you would respond to my post, I did not ask you

to drop anything. Not ever. I waited three weeks, which seems like a

reasonable period of time. If you did not have time the courtesy of a

one line post or e-mail letting me know does not seem unreasonable to

expect.

 

Bob