Guest guest Posted May 16, 2001 Report Share Posted May 16, 2001 Hello! Cayce was a siderealist? Hmmm... Later, Kevin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2001 Report Share Posted May 16, 2001 I just joined the group yesterday, and when I got home I discovered a letter of mine was published in this month's issue of " Venture Inward " (an Association for Research and Enlightenment magazine based on the Edgar Cayce Readings - circulation of 23,000). My letter pointed out that the A.R.E. was in direct conflict with the Cayce readings by offering only " tropical " astrological charts and literature; and I proposed they follow Cayce's astrological advice as precisely as they follow his health remedies, and use the " sidereal " measurement. It's frustrating that a large company that should know better does something just because everyone else does it that way. Kudos to the rest of the members of this group who do their part to enlighten the world. - Hilary PS:(A.R.E. link is: http://www.are-cayce.com) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 At 08:46 PM 5/16/01 -0000, you wrote: >I just joined the group yesterday, and when I got home I discovered a >letter of mine was published in this month's issue of " Venture >Inward " Hilary, is it possible to obtain a copy of your letter? I belonged to the ARE for many years and have done a lot of research on Cayce's astrology. I have the Cayce CD with all the readings. I've written some articles on his astrology, and yes, I always use the sidereal zodiac. Sincerely, Terese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 If you study Cayce's readings carefully, he referred sometimes to the tropical signs and sometimes to the actual constellations. He said several times that the signs should be put in the " Persian calendar " rather than the Egyptian because the Egyptian system was about 30 degrees off. It's rather complicated, but it did seem that Cayce was recommending the sidereal zodiac. I started an article on the calendars and astrology, but the ARE wasn't interested. Didn't even reply to my inquiry or mention the manuscript I sent. I've done a lot of research on the old astrological systems. The first zodiac was, of course, linked to the constellations rather than the seasons and was in use during the Persian period in Mesopotamia. Terese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 The Bradley-Fagen ayanamsha is 23:55':35 " . RJ - " Hanni Wienkoop " <hanni.wienkoop Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:19 AM Vs: Enlightening our neighborsn Hi everyone. I pointed all the time " the ayanamsa " is 30 degrees off ,behind, the tropical system. That is a fact. Hanni Wienkoop -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Teresa Hamilton <eastwest Vastaanottaja: Päivä: 17. toukokuuta 2001 1:29 Aihe: Re: Enlightening our neighborsn >If you study Cayce's readings carefully, he referred sometimes to the >tropical signs and sometimes to the actual constellations. He said several >times that the signs should be put in the " Persian calendar " rather than the >Egyptian because the Egyptian system was about 30 degrees off. > >It's rather complicated, but it did seem that Cayce was recommending the >sidereal zodiac. I started an article on the calendars and astrology, but >the ARE wasn't interested. Didn't even reply to my inquiry or mention the >manuscript I sent. I've done a lot of research on the old astrological >systems. The first zodiac was, of course, linked to the constellations >rather than the seasons and was in use during the Persian period in Mesopotamia. > >Terese > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > >Shortcut URL to this page: > /community/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2001 Report Share Posted May 17, 2001 When Cayce said the signs were approximately 30 degrees off, that could easily mean 24, 25, 26, degrees or whatever. Any of the existing ayanamsas might be the correct one. The proof of an ayanamsa is in the varga (sub-charts). Research on the navamsa is fascinating, especially for homosexuality and AIDS (mainly because there is so much data available on these). I believe that you can zero in on the ayanamsa to within a few seconds. Certain planets are in the 7th or related to the 7th and Venus. I'm starting this research all over again since Lois Rodden's computer database is now available with the best data possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.