Siblings

[Guest guest]

Dear seshadri ji, I am check this in one case.now i dont remember in which reader i read but like this: (1)Note down Dasa aNd Bhukti of father. and starlord of dasa and bhukti nath.. (2) Note down Borth RP oF childs. Now which rp and DB match that paricular child lives with the parent. regards kanak Sesh Krish <kseshadri_2000 wrote: Dear List Members, I am seeking help on the following: 1)what does the rule book/astro canons say when you are to look at the houses representing successive children. Is it the case that the first child is represented by the 5th HOuse, the second one 3rd from that and so on. 2)Has anyone in the list had

occassion to experience how the above rule or any other rule has worked in their experience.? 3) If out of many children, if one paricular child lives with the parent, whereas others have shifted out of the house, can this be investigated in terms of finding association between that child ( identified as in step 1 above) and the 2nd house. The 2nd house is the house of family. Identifying the particular child is an extremely important area in my view, as then one can explore several dimensions between the parent and that child. I shall feel thankful for any feed back Best regards, Seshadri >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

[Guest guest]

Dear Kanak, Thanks for that feedback. It makes sense , for in KSK's work he talks of the houses of 2,7 and 11 when discussing marriage. And it is my own belief (and is validated often in cases I have had occassion to study) that there has to be some match of these significators between the husband and wife. Now you are pointing out the same kind of linkages, but more interestingly in terms of how it unfolds in the D/B/A. Pretty useful tip. Let me check how it works in cases I investigate. Thanks once again. SeshadriKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear seshadri ji, I am check this in one case.now i dont remember in which reader i read but like this: (1)Note down Dasa aNd Bhukti of father. and starlord of dasa and

bhukti nath.. (2) Note down Borth RP oF childs. Now which rp and DB match that paricular child lives with the parent. regards kanak Sesh Krish <kseshadri_2000 wrote: Dear List Members, I am seeking help on the following: 1)what does the rule book/astro canons say when you are to look at the houses representing successive children. Is it the case that the first child is represented by the 5th HOuse, the second one 3rd from that and so on. 2)Has anyone in the list had occassion to experience how the above rule or any other rule has worked in their experience.? 3) If out of many children, if one paricular child lives with the parent, whereas others have shifted out of the

house, can this be investigated in terms of finding association between that child ( identified as in step 1 above) and the 2nd house. The 2nd house is the house of family. Identifying the particular child is an extremely important area in my view, as then one can explore several dimensions between the parent and that child. I shall feel thankful for any feed back Best regards, Seshadri >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

[Guest guest]

Dear sheshadri ji, Shri Kuppuji write one articals on this subject and Raichurji and Rangaraja develop software on this for marriage matching and this rules work most perfectly. i am done more then 500 matching with help of this rules and found very-very good result. please read this articals.which is publish in kp and astrology. regard kanakSesh Krish <kseshadri_2000 wrote: Dear Kanak, Thanks for that feedback. It makes sense , for in KSK's work he talks of the houses of 2,7 and 11 when discussing marriage. And it is my own belief (and is validated often in cases I have had occassion to study) that there has to be some match of these significators between the husband and wife. Now you are pointing out the same kind of linkages, but

more interestingly in terms of how it unfolds in the D/B/A. Pretty useful tip. Let me check how it works in cases I investigate. Thanks once again. SeshadriKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear seshadri ji, I am check this in one case.now i dont remember in which reader i read but like this: (1)Note down Dasa aNd Bhukti of father. and starlord of dasa and bhukti nath.. (2) Note down Borth RP oF childs. Now which rp and DB match that paricular child lives with the parent. regards kanak Sesh Krish <kseshadri_2000 wrote: Dear List Members, I am seeking help on the following: 1)what does the rule book/astro canons say when you are to look at the houses representing successive children. Is it the case that the first child is represented by the 5th HOuse, the second one 3rd from that and so on. 2)Has anyone in the list had occassion to experience how the above rule or any other rule has worked in their experience.? 3) If out of many children, if one paricular child lives with the parent, whereas others have shifted out of the house, can this be investigated in terms of finding association between that child ( identified as in step 1 above) and the 2nd house. The 2nd house is the house of family. Identifying the particular child is an extremely important area in my view, as then one can explore several dimensions between the parent and that child. I shall feel thankful for any feed back

Best regards, Seshadri >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

[Guest guest]

Dear Sesh, You have stated the K.P. Rule quite correctly...first,second,third chid and so on is to be reckoned as per the rule,for successive children...living or dead...! The above in my experience,has served me very well...! With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Sesh Krish <kseshadri_2000 wrote: Dear List Members, I am seeking help on the following: 1)what does the rule book/astro canons say when you are to look at the houses representing successive children. Is it the case that the first child is represented by the 5th HOuse, the second one 3rd from that and so on. 2)Has anyone in the list had occassion to experience how the above rule or any other rule has worked in their experience.? 3) If out of many children, if one paricular child lives with the parent, whereas others have shifted out of the house, can this be investigated in terms of finding association between that child ( identified as in step 1 above) and the 2nd house. The 2nd house is the house of family. Identifying the particular child is an extremely important area in my view, as then one can explore several dimensions between the parent and

that child. I shall feel thankful for any feed back Best regards, Seshadri Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.