Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Dear learned members (I mean every member), Perhaps by now all of us are tired and left with very little or no energy, time and again " misunderstand the subject than understand " . Books are undoubtedly a potential piece of information and most often reflects the author's own experiences. In Astrology although we claim it to be a scientific approach, the interpretation of any data in our possession is just a matter of Divinity and it continues to be " Providential " . Late Prof.KSK undoubtedly fell under the category of a " chosen few " and it was simply a gift of God. We can never immitate him, whatever be the logic that we apply. After all he has shown a way to arrive at some conclusion, which is highly circumstantial, some times within the rule book and some times outside the book. Books are definitely a good guide which can throw up ideas when we hit the dead end. Lot of water has flown on these books and some book/s are definitely outside the expectations. In my opinion, KP System is a very powerful engine and one should build a customised vehicle, tailored to suit one's need and circumstances. From this point of view, can I put the following points for your consideration: 1. Use KP System engine as mentioned above. 2. At any given point of time all the planets are continuously active and subscribing for our moment to moment needs and necessities. It is a Team work by them and the outcome is a package deal. Our Natal chart is a bench mark, defining the minm. and max. limits of what one can expect on various issues, in this life. Therefore, (a) how do we go about with this background (b) how do we decipher the data in terms of a range of good and bad, favourable and unfavourable. © since the planets are continuously moving, how do we capture the real time effects for each one of us. (d) how do we corelate with our natal chart. 3. Every one of us and even as per the books, we are heavily depending upon the Horary for more effective and better results. It is more than evident now the Horary has overtaken Natal chart. Does it mean that our natal chart is redundant? 4. In horary obviously the current transits are well accounted and it is indeed effective. But however, it is our inability or deficiency to interpret the data because we are unable to draw a link between the natal and Horary. Everyone in this world cannot be like Late Prof.KSK to be correct right through. Can we question God as to why only he was special? Can we piggy back on his achievements? He has done his best within the life span that was available to him. 5. Therefore we have to request Software experts in the Forum and outside too, if available to: (a) think and come out with some solution taking these parameters, first for birth chart (b) address the transits, which is a seamless (continuous without any break) process and find a method to corelate this with the natal chart 6. If we can think on these lines, perhaps quite soon,we would have more meaningful input data for interpretation, which can be done according to KP Outline. Just because we do not have the same gift of God what Late Prof.KSK had does not mean we have to close our show. I request the members to introspect and come out with some points which can help our software experts to do something. I am not saying that it is as easy as said, but there is no harm to start thinking on these lines. Let us put our brain into action instead of relying that heavily on books. Afterall the good predictions that have come out are nothing but one's own intellectual property and not books. This is my humble opinion. Let us not become slaves of books but be the master of it by mixing information with our application of mind. Any one can write a book and anything in the print form makes a psychological impact. No one is going to hang us if we go wrong by depending upon our own God given gift, however little it is. Each human being has his own intellectual capabilities, intution and divinty etc. Regards, K Jagadish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Dear Jagadish, Thanks for your views. As a software developer I wish to point out that unless we evolve a coherent methodology for analysis and prediction, it is not much useful to write software for the same. Our first objective must be to get things working manually. After that it might be worthwhile to think about automating. If programming help is required to analyse a large number of charts, people like me can pitch in. That is what I did this time and sometime ago when we tried to understand birth rectification techniques. But first we must be clear about what we are interested in. If you recall, I had listed various planetary configurations that might go into the definition of Punarphoo before embarking on programming. I encourage you to think further along the lines you have mentioned in the email, and when you have some concrete ideas, feel free to take our help. Neville Lang is perhaps our seniormost astronomer-astrologer- programmer and we can pick his brain when the time comes. Regards, Rangarajan , " kjagadish48 " <kjagadish48> wrote: > Dear learned members (I mean every member), > > Perhaps by now all of us are tired and left with very little or no > energy, time and again " misunderstand the subject than understand " . > Books are undoubtedly a potential piece of information and most often > reflects the author's own experiences. In Astrology although we claim > it to be a scientific approach, the interpretation of any data in our > possession is just a matter of Divinity and it continues to > be " Providential " . Late Prof.KSK undoubtedly fell under the category > of a " chosen few " and it was simply a gift of God. We can never > immitate him, whatever be the logic that we apply. After all he has > shown a way to arrive at some conclusion, which is highly > circumstantial, some times within the rule book and some times > outside the book. Books are definitely a good guide which can throw > up ideas when we hit the dead end. Lot of water has flown on these > books and some book/s are definitely outside the expectations. > > In my opinion, KP System is a very powerful engine and one should > build a customised vehicle, tailored to suit one's need and > circumstances. From this point of view, can I put the following > points for your consideration: > > 1. Use KP System engine as mentioned above. > > 2. At any given point of time all the planets are continuously active > and subscribing for our moment to moment needs and necessities. It is > a Team work by them and the outcome is a package deal. Our Natal > chart is a bench mark, defining the minm. and max. limits of what one > can expect on various issues, in this life. Therefore, > > (a) how do we go about with this background > > (b) how do we decipher the data in terms of a range of good and bad, > favourable and unfavourable. > > © since the planets are continuously moving, how do we capture the > real time effects for each one of us. > > (d) how do we corelate with our natal chart. > > 3. Every one of us and even as per the books, we are heavily > depending upon the Horary for more effective and better results. It > is more than evident now the Horary has overtaken Natal chart. Does > it mean that our natal chart is redundant? > > 4. In horary obviously the current transits are well accounted and it > is indeed effective. But however, it is our inability or deficiency > to interpret the data because we are unable to draw a link between > the natal and Horary. Everyone in this world cannot be like Late > Prof.KSK to be correct right through. Can we question God as to why > only he was special? Can we piggy back on his achievements? He has > done his best within the life span that was available to him. > > 5. Therefore we have to request Software experts in the Forum and > outside too, if available to: > > (a) think and come out with some solution taking these parameters, > first for birth chart > > (b) address the transits, which is a seamless (continuous without any > break) process and find a method to corelate this with the natal chart > > 6. If we can think on these lines, perhaps quite soon,we would have > more meaningful input data for interpretation, which can be done > according to KP Outline. > > Just because we do not have the same gift of God what Late Prof.KSK > had does not mean we have to close our show. > > I request the members to introspect and come out with some points > which can help our software experts to do something. I am not saying > that it is as easy as said, but there is no harm to start thinking on > these lines. > > Let us put our brain into action instead of relying that heavily on > books. Afterall the good predictions that have come out are nothing > but one's own intellectual property and not books. This is my humble > opinion. Let us not become slaves of books but be the master of it by > mixing information with our application of mind. Any one can write a > book and anything in the print form makes a psychological impact. No > one is going to hang us if we go wrong by depending upon our own God > given gift, however little it is. Each human being has his own > intellectual capabilities, intution and divinty etc. > > Regards, > > K Jagadish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Dear Dr.Rangarajan, Thanks for your comments. I have noted with keen interest. As long as things external to the core subject is taken off in the discussion, it is almost impossible to do anything. I will keep my fingers crossed and I am keen on interacting with you in some way or the other and in the bargain, if at all I come across something new and good, then I will report to you. For reasons not known to me, there is a very heavy bias and attachment for certain points here. Truth is bitter! Silence is golden! I may not reply to any one, but I will keep in touch with you. Regards, K Jagadish Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Jagadish,Thanks for your views. As a software developer I wish to point out that unless we evolve a coherent methodology for analysis and prediction, it is not much useful to write software for the same. Our first objective must be to get things working manually. After that it might be worthwhile to think about automating.If programming help is required to analyse a large number of charts, people like me can pitch in. That is what I did this time and sometime ago when we tried to understand birth rectification techniques. But first we must be clear about what we are interested in. If you recall, I had listed various planetary configurations that might go into the definition of Punarphoo before embarking on programming. I encourage you to think further along the lines you have mentioned in the email, and when you have some concrete ideas, feel free to take our help.Neville Lang is perhaps our seniormost astronomer-astrologer-programmer and we can pick his brain when the time comes.Regards,Rangarajan , "kjagadish48" <kjagadish48> wrote:> Dear learned members (I mean every member),> > Perhaps by now all of us are tired and left with very little or no > energy, time and again "misunderstand the subject than understand". > Books are undoubtedly a potential piece of information and most often > reflects the author's own experiences. In Astrology although we claim > it to be a scientific approach, the interpretation of any data in our > possession is just a matter of Divinity and it continues to > be "Providential". Late Prof.KSK undoubtedly fell under the category > of a "chosen few" and it was simply a gift of God. We can never > immitate him, whatever be the logic that we apply. After all he has > shown a way to arrive at some conclusion, which is highly > circumstantial, some times within the rule book and some times > outside the book. Books are definitely a good guide which can throw > up ideas when we hit the dead end. Lot of water has flown on these > books and some book/s are definitely outside the expectations. > > In my opinion, KP System is a very powerful engine and one should > build a customised vehicle, tailored to suit one's need and > circumstances. From this point of view, can I put the following > points for your consideration:> > 1. Use KP System engine as mentioned above.> > 2. At any given point of time all the planets are continuously active > and subscribing for our moment to moment needs and necessities. It is > a Team work by them and the outcome is a package deal. Our Natal > chart is a bench mark, defining the minm. and max. limits of what one > can expect on various issues, in this life. Therefore, > > (a) how do we go about with this background> > (b) how do we decipher the data in terms of a range of good and bad, > favourable and unfavourable.> > © since the planets are continuously moving, how do we capture the > real time effects for each one of us.> > (d) how do we corelate with our natal chart.> > 3. Every one of us and even as per the books, we are heavily > depending upon the Horary for more effective and better results. It > is more than evident now the Horary has overtaken Natal chart. Does > it mean that our natal chart is redundant?> > 4. In horary obviously the current transits are well accounted and it > is indeed effective. But however, it is our inability or deficiency > to interpret the data because we are unable to draw a link between > the natal and Horary. Everyone in this world cannot be like Late > Prof.KSK to be correct right through. Can we question God as to why > only he was special? Can we piggy back on his achievements? He has > done his best within the life span that was available to him.> > 5. Therefore we have to request Software experts in the Forum and > outside too, if available to:> > (a) think and come out with some solution taking these parameters, > first for birth chart> > (b) address the transits, which is a seamless (continuous without any > break) process and find a method to corelate this with the natal chart> > 6. If we can think on these lines, perhaps quite soon,we would have > more meaningful input data for interpretation, which can be done > according to KP Outline.> > Just because we do not have the same gift of God what Late Prof.KSK > had does not mean we have to close our show.> > I request the members to introspect and come out with some points > which can help our software experts to do something. I am not saying > that it is as easy as said, but there is no harm to start thinking on > these lines. > > Let us put our brain into action instead of relying that heavily on > books. Afterall the good predictions that have come out are nothing > but one's own intellectual property and not books. This is my humble > opinion. Let us not become slaves of books but be the master of it by > mixing information with our application of mind. Any one can write a > book and anything in the print form makes a psychological impact. No > one is going to hang us if we go wrong by depending upon our own God > given gift, however little it is. Each human being has his own > intellectual capabilities, intution and divinty etc.> > Regards,> > K Jagadish India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Go to http://.shaadi.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.