Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Dear Shree Rao No body is trying to disown the work done by the "learned" authors of 'PUNARPHOO SAT AND MOON". One is trying to understand and get a clerer conception of Punarphoo. IT IS STATED BY YOURSELF: Sat in Moon's star or sub,or vice versa,constitutes Punarphoo and it will interfere with marriage-related affairs,ONLY if Sat or Moon is posited in I,III,V,VII & X The natural interpretation is THAT in a Purphoo example, the primary consideration is SAT IN MOON,S STAR OR SUB OR VICE VESRA. So one should consider Purphoo as existant Only if this condition is satisfied. Not otherwise. Do you agree ? If you agree I will proceed further in the discussion GOOD LUCK Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Members, It is quite surprising to note that a large number of members quote the loose definition of Punarphoo and extend its effect to marriage and related affairs,needlessly...continue to aver that this combination interferes with Marriage and related affairs... I will RESTATE IT,(as given in the book), for the benefit of MEMBERS... to avoid needless repetition of the loose definition ..."Sat-Moon connection causes Punarphoo...etc..." and examine its effects in marriage-related affairs... Isn't this,possibly, the direct result of an attempt at over-simplifying (to one line) the definition of Punarphoo...? Sat in Moon's star or sub,or vice versa,constitutes Punarphoo and it will interfere with marriage-related affairs,ONLY if Sat or Moon is posited in I,III,V,VII & X... The above is very clearly differentiated by the authors,right in the begining itself,on page 3 of the book. ! It is this repeated assualt on the book and the authors by members without having properly read and digested the definition carefully is quite distressing,atleast,to me... Criticism is always welcome but uninformed criticism should be avoided isn't it ? With the best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Go to http://.shaadi.com From: Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:51:32 +0100 (BST)RE: Punarphoo - Study Dears Kanak and Rangarajan, Punarphoo dosha gives delay in marriage, engagement etc.,ONLY when Sat is in Moon's star or sub and vice-versa, AND, IF MOON IS POSITED IN BHAVAS I,III,V VII ,X...as given in the book Pumarphoo...on p.3., very clearly, under the heading..."What is Punarphoo"... I feel that it is this observation which needs to be tested...not just Sat and Moon "connection"... Do the 50% cases that do not show delay in marriage/engagement etc., satisfy the above given criteria...? It is my humble request that research must be carried out carefully...and meticulously,without any bias,and it must be seen to be FAIR...and not seen as done with the sole objective of trying to 'pick holes' in Vaikari's nicely written book...a first of its kind attempt,to unfold the hitherto unfamiliar phenomenon of Punarphoo,to K.P. followers... Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Kanak Bosmia <kanbosastro wrote: Dear Rangarajan, Congretulatins........... Punarphoo means delay in marrigae is wrong impression. punarphoo delay in evry fild of life.and cusp involve aer where SAT and MOON signifies in chart. for exsample if sat and moon signifies 6,10,11 then netive face delay in job or bussines. regards kanak "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga To: Subject: Punarphoo - StudyMon, 05 Sep 2005 08:46:02 -0000Dear Members,I took 30 birth charts (some given by Shri.Raichur and others in this forum) and looked for some connection between Sat and Moon. Roughly 50% of the charts were of people who did not have any obstacle or delay in marriage. The results of the study are available in an Excel file uploaded to the site.I invite members to comment.Regards,Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2005 Report Share Posted September 6, 2005 Dear Mr Raichur, I had presumed,like always that most responders/members have read books on the subject being discussed, some have read or atleast possess, the book,and hence I had quoted only one important para...from the entire page...(saying so...) Pp 72-91 contain additional explanations on Punarphoo Dosha with 10 specific and illustrative example-horoscopes in addition to the ones I have made mention of...(74%) Thus, Mr.Raichur almost the entire book is devoted to Punarphoo Dosha and its adverse effects on marriage and marriage-related matters... ! Under the circumstances,what could any normal asdtrologer like me have concluded ? I have,inevitably,confirmed my impression,rather late in the day, that most repondents have NOT read the book carefully,as my reply to Mr.Rangarajan, specifically on this very issue, conveys...I have also conveyed my distress that it seems to me that suddenly,and all in the name of research, an attempt is being made to debunk the book and the author(s),and that too by so many people on the site,who haven't read the book carefully enough. I regret Mr.Raichur,that some of the mails on the site...do give me this impression...(could be my fault.) The qouting of a para only,perhaps has given you the impression that I have defined Punaraphoo...that way... I do not contribute to the idea of a one-line definition for such a profound and difficult-to-fathom-subject like Punarphoo... With highest regards, Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Shree Rao No body is trying to disown the work done by the "learned" authors of 'PUNARPHOO SAT AND MOON". One is trying to understand and get a clerer conception of Punarphoo. IT IS STATED BY YOURSELF: Sat in Moon's star or sub,or vice versa,constitutes Punarphoo and it will interfere with marriage-related affairs,ONLY if Sat or Moon is posited in I,III,V,VII & X The natural interpretation is THAT in a Purphoo example, the primary consideration is SAT IN MOON,S STAR OR SUB OR VICE VESRA. So one should consider Purphoo as existant Only if this condition is satisfied. Not otherwise. Do you agree ? If you agree I will proceed further in the discussion GOOD LUCK Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Members, It is quite surprising to note that a large number of members quote the loose definition of Punarphoo and extend its effect to marriage and related affairs,needlessly...continue to aver that this combination interferes with Marriage and related affairs... I will RESTATE IT,(as given in the book), for the benefit of MEMBERS... to avoid needless repetition of the loose definition ..."Sat-Moon connection causes Punarphoo...etc..." and examine its effects in marriage-related affairs... Isn't this,possibly, the direct result of an attempt at over-simplifying (to one line) the definition of Punarphoo...? Sat in Moon's star or sub,or vice versa,constitutes Punarphoo and it will interfere with marriage-related affairs,ONLY if Sat or Moon is posited in I,III,V,VII & X... The above is very clearly differentiated by the authors,right in the begining itself,on page 3 of the book. ! It is this repeated assualt on the book and the authors by members without having properly read and digested the definition carefully is quite distressing,atleast,to me... Criticism is always welcome but uninformed criticism should be avoided isn't it ? With the best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.Go to http://.shaadi.com From: Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:51:32 +0100 (BST)RE: Punarphoo - Study Dears Kanak and Rangarajan, Punarphoo dosha gives delay in marriage, engagement etc.,ONLY when Sat is in Moon's star or sub and vice-versa, AND, IF MOON IS POSITED IN BHAVAS I,III,V VII ,X...as given in the book Pumarphoo...on p.3., very clearly, under the heading..."What is Punarphoo"... I feel that it is this observation which needs to be tested...not just Sat and Moon "connection"... Do the 50% cases that do not show delay in marriage/engagement etc., satisfy the above given criteria...? It is my humble request that research must be carried out carefully...and meticulously,without any bias,and it must be seen to be FAIR...and not seen as done with the sole objective of trying to 'pick holes' in Vaikari's nicely written book...a first of its kind attempt,to unfold the hitherto unfamiliar phenomenon of Punarphoo,to K.P. followers... Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Kanak Bosmia <kanbosastro wrote: Dear Rangarajan, Congretulatins........... Punarphoo means delay in marrigae is wrong impression. punarphoo delay in evry fild of life.and cusp involve aer where SAT and MOON signifies in chart. for exsample if sat and moon signifies 6,10,11 then netive face delay in job or bussines. regards kanak "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga To: Subject: Punarphoo - StudyMon, 05 Sep 2005 08:46:02 -0000Dear Members,I took 30 birth charts (some given by Shri.Raichur and others in this forum) and looked for some connection between Sat and Moon. Roughly 50% of the charts were of people who did not have any obstacle or delay in marriage. The results of the study are available in an Excel file uploaded to the site.I invite members to comment.Regards,Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.