Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Friends, I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even discussion. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 Dear Punit, I entirely agree with you. Astrology is calculations, reading, interpretations, of the language of stars[planets]. Different systems are there and we should respect all. No use taking hardliner approach. New systems that developed recently in astrology are: KAS , cuspal interlinks, and System approch. These also give some light to problems in different ways. We have to respect all. Inder , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote: > Friends, > I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to > prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of > astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that > whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same > results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even > discussion. > Thanks & Regards, > Punit Pandey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Dears Punit & Inder Vohra, We are in the logy group aren't we ? Let us then discuss K.P., and properly,at that...without mixing different systems under one umbrella...the site's name then should not be K.P. astrology... ! ! That is my humble suggestion...live up to your name... Yours sincerely, L.Y.Rao. Inder <indervohra2001 wrote: Dear Punit,I entirely agree with you. Astrology is calculations, reading, interpretations, of the language of stars[planets].Different systems are there and we should respect all. No use taking hardliner approach.New systems that developed recently in astrology are: KAS , cuspal interlinks, and System approch. These also give some light to problems in different ways. We have to respect all.Inder , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:> Friends,> I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to > prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of > astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that > whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same > results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even > discussion. > Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey Free antispam, antivirus and 1GB to save all your messages Only in Mail: http://in.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Dear Mr.Punit Pandey, I fully agree with your views. What better statement you can make. The issue is sensitive. I can understand your predicament and your limitations are much more than scope. The discussion itself becomes impossible, let alone any kind of value addition to the system, if we are thinking and if it is possible. Perhaps every member here is definitely focusing on KP alone and everything is with respect to that. Admitedly KP is based on 5,000 year old Traditional System. It is 50 years versus 5,000 years. Therefore every member here who is determined to use the System has come here only to discuss the New System, but selective reference to the 5,000 year old points is a necessary evil. To putforth personal idealogy and agenda if any, of any individual or group of individuals, in a group is counter productive. In a knowledge based discussion, quotations, information, narrations and related case studies are inevitable. I am sure that if we have to discuss the subject in its totality, there is a dire need to foray into every activity of human beings. This Astrological Tsunami needs to be looked into. It is high time that we cast a chart of starting of this extremely usfel Forum and predict the future! I am committed to meticulously follow the norms of the Forum. Let us first frame the rules and then play the game, while I assure you my whole hearted co-operation. Regards, K Jagadish Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: Friends, I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even discussion. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey Free antispam, antivirus and 1GB to save all your messages Only in Mail: http://in.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Jagadish ji & Friends, Rules are already formed and can be found at - Forum/. I was expecting that we can face such situations once we unmoderate the forum. It is the responsibility of all members to adhere to the rules. Member's id will be put back into the moderated list, if found not abiding above rules. It is my final request to all members to stop discussing KP vrs others. I hope that forum's stand-point is clear in this regard. Regards, Punit Pandey On 8/30/05, Jagadish K <kjagadish48 wrote: Dear Mr.Punit Pandey, I fully agree with your views. What better statement you can make. The issue is sensitive. I can understand your predicament and your limitations are much more than scope. The discussion itself becomes impossible, let alone any kind of value addition to the system, if we are thinking and if it is possible. Perhaps every member here is definitely focusing on KP alone and everything is with respect to that. Admitedly KP is based on 5,000 year old Traditional System. It is 50 years versus 5,000 years. Therefore every member here who is determined to use the System has come here only to discuss the New System, but selective reference to the 5,000 year old points is a necessary evil. To putforth personal idealogy and agenda if any, of any individual or group of individuals, in a group is counter productive. In a knowledge based discussion, quotations, information, narrations and related case studies are inevitable. I am sure that if we have to discuss the subject in its totality, there is a dire need to foray into every activity of human beings. This Astrological Tsunami needs to be looked into. It is high time that we cast a chart of starting of this extremely usfel Forum and predict the future! I am committed to meticulously follow the norms of the Forum. Let us first frame the rules and then play the game, while I assure you my whole hearted co-operation. Regards, K Jagadish Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: Friends, I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even discussion. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2005 Report Share Posted August 31, 2005 Dear Mr.Punit Pandey, I have tacitly agreed verbatim to the quoted Message of yours: "Friends, I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even discussion. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey" This gives enough room for every member to participate and freely, without any bias, ill-will and hatred or liking for other systems and express their views with the objective of exploring: 1. First of all to understand better the KP system 2. Further fine tuning of KP, if at all possible. 3. Can there be any more points of additions, alterations (and deletions, if any). I am posting this Message since the rules of the Forum posted by you can be perhaps supplemented by the above quoted message of yours. Please confirm so that we can atleast go ahead with the discussion without getting into contraversies. I should not be treated as a contraversial member and in your opinion, if I have transgressed the Rules of the Forum, any time I will immediately retire thanking the Forum and its members "WITH AN UNCONDITIONAL APOLOGY". More than anything I just joined the Forum very recently, as you know. I understand your delicate role as a Presiding Officer of the Forum. Regards, K JagadishPunit Pandey <punitp wrote: Friends, I request all members to respect all branches of astrology and not try to prove superiority of one over another. I myself use various branches of astrology and found them useful from different prospective. I am sure that whoever experimented with different branches would have experienced the same results. Without this respect there is no scope of research and even discussion. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey Free antispam, antivirus and 1GB to save all your messages Only in Mail: http://in.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.