To:Moderator,Suggestion for Group List Members Clasification ,NOT an ADVISE

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is

NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members

and My Respected Veterans in this field.

 

I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all

members in a much more organised way for identification from there

level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

 

I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300

group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say

the word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if the

direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if

it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.

 

Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........

 

 

1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent

 

2) Intermidiate Level

 

3)Advance Level

 

4)Super Advance Level

 

Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,

Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message

how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

 

Regards

 

P.R.SELVAM

[Guest guest]

Selvam ji,

 

Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other members.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote:

Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its isNOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members

and My Respected Veterans in this field.I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of allmembers in a much more organised way for identification from therelevel of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to saythe word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if thedirection of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if

it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent2) Intermidiate Level

3)Advance Level4)Super Advance LevelNote;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy, Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next messagehow Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

RegardsP.R.SELVAM

[Guest guest]

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:

1) I do not understand how this " classification " of members will

help.

2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by

the moderator, or someone else?

3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on:

a)when they started to learn astrology

b)how long they have been practising astrology

c)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free

as a hobby)

d)how many predictions have been correct

 

For example, is there any member in this group who can be

called " Super Advanced " or even " Advanced " ?

4)I don't understand what " Telepathy " has to do with astrology.

 

I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole

exercise will help.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Selvam ji,

> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions

from other

> members.

> Thanks & Regards,

> Punit Pandey

>

> On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only,

its is

> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our

Members

> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.

> >

> > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of

all

> > members in a much more organised way for identification from

there

> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

> >

> > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than

300

> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry

to say

> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if the

> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how

about if

> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.

> >

> > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........

> >

> >

> > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent

> >

> > 2) Intermidiate Level

> >

> > 3)Advance Level

> >

> > 4)Super Advance Level

> >

> > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,

> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message

> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > P.R.SELVAM

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Moderator

I agree with the suggestion of classification. There need be only 3 levels.

The Beginner, the Intermediate, and Advanced. The classification should be honstly

done by the MEMBER Himself and not by the Moderator.

Although I have been studying KP for Last 20 yrs. I would classify myself as a n Intermediate

K.P. Astrologer

 

good luck

Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Selvam ji,

 

Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other members.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote: Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its isNOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members and My Respected Veterans in this field.I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of allmembers in a much more organised way for identification from therelevel of a Devine Subject in Astrology. I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to saythe word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if thedirection of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some

extent2) Intermidiate Level 3)Advance Level4)Super Advance LevelNote;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy, Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next messagehow Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn RegardsP.R.SELVAM

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

I could not understand what perpose would be served by such

classification. We are all discussing here astrology, exchanging

views/experiences and trying to gain some additional knowledge.

 

If this is the perpose then no classification is perhaps needed.

Classification may be a requirement if professional help is needed

by some clients and we are able to give him clssified list of

astrologers with charges etc.

 

If there is some objective to classification etc then only we should

think of classification and ways to do that.

 

Inder

, anant raichur <anant_1608>

wrote:

> Dear Moderator

> I agree with the suggestion of classification. There need be only

3 levels.

> The Beginner, the Intermediate, and Advanced. The classification

should be honstly

> done by the MEMBER Himself and not by the Moderator.

> Although I have been studying KP for Last 20 yrs. I would classify

myself as a n Intermediate

> K.P. Astrologer

>

> good luck

>

>

> Punit Pandey <punitp@g...> wrote:

> Selvam ji,

>

> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions

from other members.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote:

> Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its

is

> NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our

Members

> and My Respected Veterans in this field.

>

> I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all

> members in a much more organised way for identification from there

> level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

>

> I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300

> group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to

say

> the word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if the

> direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about

if

> it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.

>

> Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........

>

>

> 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent

>

> 2) Intermidiate Level

>

> 3)Advance Level

>

> 4)Super Advance Level

>

> Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,

> Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message

> how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

>

> Regards

>

> P.R.SELVAM

>

>

>

>

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Moderator,

The suggestion of classification by the member himself

is a good idea .This will ensure a fair

classification.In case it is not rated correctly, it

can be easily made out by the comments and the matter

of discussion made by the member.

This forum is research oriented and from learning each

other's experiences and not discussing personal

situation/ matters.

the moderator can ask all the mrmbers to classify

themselves

With best wishes

Ranade

--- anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:

 

> Dear Moderator

> I agree with the suggestion of classification. There

> need be only 3 levels.

> The Beginner, the Intermediate, and Advanced. The

> classification should be honstly

> done by the MEMBER Himself and not by the Moderator.

>

> Although I have been studying KP for Last 20 yrs. I

> would classify myself as a n Intermediate

> K.P. Astrologer

>

> good luck

>

>

> Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

> Selvam ji,

>

> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for

> suggestions from other members.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote:

>

> Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble

> Request only, its is

> NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered

> by our Members

> and My Respected Veterans in this field.

>

> I think there is a need for clasification and the

> catergory of all

> members in a much more organised way for

> identification from there

> level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

>

> I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be

> more than 300

> group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a

> tool(sorry to say

> the word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many

> groups,But if the

> direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its

> welcome,how about if

> it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not

> be healthy.

>

> Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........

>

>

> 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to

> some extent

>

> 2) Intermidiate Level

>

> 3)Advance Level

>

> 4)Super Advance Level

>

> Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like

> Telepathy,

> Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my

> next message

> how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

>

> Regards

>

> P.R.SELVAM

>

>

>

>

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Rangarajan,

I entirely agree with you...

By indulging in this type of classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve this objective...

This is my humble opinion...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:1) I do not understand how this "classification" of members will help. 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by the moderator, or someone else?3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on: a)when they started to learn astrologyb)how long they have been practising astrologyc)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free as a hobby)d)how many predictions have been correctFor example, is there any member in this group who can be called "Super Advanced" or even "Advanced"? 4)I don't understand what "Telepathy" has to do with astrology.I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole exercise will help.Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:> Selvam ji,> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other > members.> Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.> > > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all> > members in a much more organised way for identification from there> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.> > > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong

to have many groups,But if the> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.> > > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........> > > > > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent> > > > 2) Intermidiate Level> > > > 3)Advance Level> > > > 4)Super Advance Level> > > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.SELVAM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Punit Pandey,

My humble feeling is as follows:

 

There should be no classification

Basically it should be a level playing field

The power of knowledge can be displayed by taking the group together and not by division of the group

Creation of self-made or dictated hierarchial levels will destroy the moral fabric of basic humility and thus may inflate one’s own ego. MAN DIES FIRST, EGO DIES NEXT!

Free flow / exchange of information should be encouraged

Members should never offend fellow members

Comments should be on the subject, but not on the author of the message

Language should be polite, under all circumstances

Highest standard of moral turpitude should be observed while presenting one’s views

Factual errors or misunderstanding of points in the books should be addressed politely

No one need assume a Teacher’s role and on the other hand help others understand better

Difference of opinion on any given subject can be justified / explained by quoting a book or can even quote their personal exposure to charts (can give birth details) thereby giving participating members to cast a chart for case study

There is bound to be some confusion about different routes to reach the same destination to predict, because of the inherent nature of the subject

Members can be suggested to type on Note Pad or so, off-line, read once or twice before posting, instead of replying immediately. This could possibly bring in higher degree of accountability apart from presenting their views better.

All though the System and approach and analysis are quite scientific, perhaps the outcome has to be generally divine. I do not know whether I am wrong if I say, "it is all a question of logging on to the Cosmic Server" (as an well-experienced friend of mine put it). It is a scientific approach to a Divine subject and therefore there are bound to be multiple views and to arrive at a consensus is almost next to impossible.

I am aware that I am slightly outside the issue on hand.

I recall that you had sought the views of members earlier to slightly de-moderate the postings to avoid delay in messages appearing in the Forum and therefore in that context I am tempted to present a few points for your kind perusal.

Regards,

K Jagadish

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Selvam ji,

 

Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other members.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote: Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its isNOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members and My Respected Veterans in this field.I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of allmembers in a much more organised way for identification from therelevel of a Devine Subject in Astrology. I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to saythe word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if thedirection of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some

extent2) Intermidiate Level 3)Advance Level4)Super Advance LevelNote;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy, Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next messagehow Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn RegardsP.R.SELVAM

[Guest guest]

M/s LY Rao, Rangarajan

 

Dear Sirs.

 

My views are in congrunece with those of yours.I have been a student of KP since 1990 and I think I am a learner, even now.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

C.K. anandYogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

 

Dear Rangarajan,

I entirely agree with you...

By indulging in this type of classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve this objective...

This is my humble opinion...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:1) I do not understand how this "classification" of members will help. 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by the moderator, or someone else?3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on: a)when they started to learn astrologyb)how long they have been practising astrologyc)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free as a hobby)d)how many predictions have been correctFor example, is there any member in this group who can be called "Super Advanced" or even "Advanced"? 4)I don't understand what "Telepathy" has to do with astrology.I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole exercise will help.Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:> Selvam ji,> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other > members.> Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.> > > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all> > members in a much more organised way for identification from there> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.> > > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong

to have many groups,But if the> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.> > > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........> > > > > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent> > > > 2) Intermidiate Level> > > > 3)Advance Level> > > > 4)Super Advance Level> > > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.SELVAM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

In my humble opinion classification of members as suggested is not at all required as I expect the disadvantages to outweigh the advantages. The present system is o.k. and works well with a lot of mutual discussions and clarifications. Therefore it can be continued instead of introducing changes, which may not bring about any desirable resultsanand karadikar <anand_karandikar2001 wrote:

 

M/s LY Rao, Rangarajan

 

Dear Sirs.

 

My views are in congrunece with those of yours.I have been a student of KP since 1990 and I think I am a learner, even now.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

C.K. anandYogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

 

Dear Rangarajan,

I entirely agree with you...

By indulging in this type of classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve this objective...

This is my humble opinion...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:1) I do not understand how this "classification" of members will help. 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by the moderator, or someone else?3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on: a)when they started to learn astrologyb)how long they have been practising astrologyc)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free as a hobby)d)how many predictions have been correctFor example, is there any member in this group who can be called "Super Advanced" or even "Advanced"? 4)I don't understand what "Telepathy" has to do with astrology.I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole exercise will help.Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:> Selvam ji,> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other > members.> Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.> > > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all> > members in a much more organised way for identification from there> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.> > > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong

to have many groups,But if the> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.> > > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........> > > > > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent> > > > 2) Intermidiate Level> > > > 3)Advance Level> > > > 4)Super Advance Level> > > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.SELVAM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear List

 

A classification could be useful in assessing the opinion or experience of a Member.

 

An opinion of a Advanced Member, would carry more weight than of a beginner, as also

 

new methods proposed for discussion.

 

good luck

Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

 

Dear Rangarajan,

I entirely agree with you...

By indulging in this type of classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve this objective...

This is my humble opinion...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:1) I do not understand how this "classification" of members will help. 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by the moderator, or someone else?3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on: a)when they started to learn astrologyb)how long they have been practising astrologyc)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free as a hobby)d)how many predictions have been correctFor example, is there any member in this group who can be called "Super Advanced" or even "Advanced"? 4)I don't understand what "Telepathy" has to do with astrology.I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole exercise will help.Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:> Selvam ji,> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other > members.> Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.> > > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all> > members in a much more organised way for identification from there> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.> > > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong

to have many groups,But if the> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.> > > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........> > > > > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent> > > > 2) Intermidiate Level> > > > 3)Advance Level> > > > 4)Super Advance Level> > > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.SELVAM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri.Raichur,

Ideally what you say is true. However I believe that good

astrologers will tend to underestimate themselves (like you did) and

some immature ones might rank themselves higher. Besides, when a

member posts a message, unless he mentions his category somewhere

(say, below his name), others won't know what his level is.

 

At present we infer other members' expertise and automatically

classify them (subconsciously) based on past postings. For example,

I feel that most of the members of this forum would have put you in

the " Advanced " category. The fact that you assessed yourself

as " Intermediate " scares us! I thought I will call myself

a " beginner " , but looks like even that is " high " when you say you

are " intermediate " .

 

So this is going to create a funny situation!

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

, anant raichur <anant_1608>

wrote:

> Dear List

>

> A classification could be useful in assessing the opinion or

experience of a Member.

>

> An opinion of a Advanced Member, would carry more weight than of a

beginner, as also

>

> new methods proposed for discussion.

>

> good luck

>

>

> Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1> wrote:

> Dear Rangarajan,

> I entirely agree with you...

> By indulging in this type of

classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to

K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member

to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve

this objective...

> This is my humble opinion...

> With best wishes,

> L.Y.Rao.

> GOOD LUCK !

>

> Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@m...> wrote:

> Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:

> 1) I do not understand how this " classification " of members will

> help.

> 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by

> the moderator, or someone else?

> 3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on:

> a)when they started to learn astrology

> b)how long they have been practising astrology

> c)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free

> as a hobby)

> d)how many predictions have been correct

>

> For example, is there any member in this group who can be

> called " Super Advanced " or even " Advanced " ?

> 4)I don't understand what " Telepathy " has to do with astrology.

>

> I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole

> exercise will help.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

>

> , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:

> > Selvam ji,

> > Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions

> from other

> > members.

> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only,

> its is

> > > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our

> Members

> > > and My Respected Veterans in this field.

> > >

> > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of

> all

> > > members in a much more organised way for identification from

> there

> > > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.

> > >

> > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than

> 300

> > > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry

> to say

> > > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if

the

> > > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how

> about if

> > > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.

> > >

> > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........

> > >

> > >

> > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some

extent

> > >

> > > 2) Intermidiate Level

> > >

> > > 3)Advance Level

> > >

> > > 4)Super Advance Level

> > >

> > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,

> > > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message

> > > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn

> > >

> > > Regards

> > >

> > > P.R.SELVAM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Raichur,

I wish to submit to you,and with due respects, to all senior and new members,my humble views on this subject...

The more important point is ...who will decide the extent of "advancement" of a member ? Also,what criteria will be used to decide this etc.,

Generally,the contents of a post can give a general idea as to how experienced,or how knowledfgeable,atleast theorectically, and how experienced a member -astrologer is... a "fairly definitive" opinion can be formed for themselves,by members, from his presentation of actual case-studies,his analysis and method of arrival to the conclusion...

I am sure,Mr.Raichur,you will agree that the more advanced members' opinions will carry more weight,by the sheer brilliance of the analysis and the accuracy of the prediction,as well as the logic used to arrive at a particular prediction or conclusion,which will very apparent...to all...and over a period of time most members will have a fair idea as to howmuch weightage is to be given to whose opinion...the classification you desire will have taken place automatically... !

With highest regards,

Yours sincerely,

L.Y.Rao.

anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote:

 

Dear List

 

A classification could be useful in assessing the opinion or experience of a Member.

 

An opinion of a Advanced Member, would carry more weight than of a beginner, as also

 

new methods proposed for discussion.

 

good luck

Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:

 

Dear Rangarajan,

I entirely agree with you...

By indulging in this type of classification,we will perhaps do more dis-service than service to K.P., and this site...the objective should be to enable every member to excel...and all members should work,whole-heartedly,to achieve this objective...

This is my humble opinion...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

Dear Selvam, Punit and Group:1) I do not understand how this "classification" of members will help. 2) Will members classify themselves or they will be classified by the moderator, or someone else?3) What is the basis of classification? Is it based on: a)when they started to learn astrologyb)how long they have been practising astrologyc)they are professional (charge a fee) or amateur (do it for free as a hobby)d)how many predictions have been correctFor example, is there any member in this group who can be called "Super Advanced" or even "Advanced"? 4)I don't understand what "Telepathy" has to do with astrology.I do not mean to disparage Selvam, but I do not see how this whole exercise will help.Regards,Rangarajan , Punit Pandey <punitp@g...>

wrote:> Selvam ji,> Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other > members.> Thanks & Regards,> Punit Pandey> > On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its is> > NOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members> > and My Respected Veterans in this field.> > > > I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of all> > members in a much more organised way for identification from there> > level of a Devine Subject in Astrology.> > > > I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300> > group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to say> > the word as a tool)It is Not wrong

to have many groups,But if the> > direction of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if> > it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.> > > > Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........> > > > > > 1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent> > > > 2) Intermidiate Level> > > > 3)Advance Level> > > > 4)Super Advance Level> > > > Note;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy,> > Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next message> > how Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn> > > > Regards> > > > P.R.SELVAM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Jagadish,

 

I fully agree with your views

 

Mukesh

 

-

Jagadish K

Saturday, August 20, 2005 11:43 PM

Re: To:Moderator,Suggestion for Group List Members Clasification ,NOT an ADVISE

 

 

Dear Mr.Punit Pandey,

My humble feeling is as follows:

 

There should be no classification Basically it should be a level playing field The power of knowledge can be displayed by taking the group together and not by division of the group Creation of self-made or dictated hierarchial levels will destroy the moral fabric of basic humility and thus may inflate one’s own ego. MAN DIES FIRST, EGO DIES NEXT! Free flow / exchange of information should be encouraged Members should never offend fellow members Comments should be on the subject, but not on the author of the message Language should be polite, under all circumstances Highest standard of moral turpitude should be observed while presenting one’s views Factual errors or misunderstanding of points in the books should be addressed politely No one need assume a Teacher’s role and on the other hand help others understand better Difference of opinion on any given subject can be justified / explained by quoting a book or can even quote their personal exposure to charts (can give birth details) thereby giving participating members to cast a chart for case study There is bound to be some confusion about different routes to reach the same destination to predict, because of the inherent nature of the subject Members can be suggested to type on Note Pad or so, off-line, read once or twice before posting, instead of replying immediately. This could possibly bring in higher degree of accountability apart from presenting their views better.

All though the System and approach and analysis are quite scientific, perhaps the outcome has to be generally divine. I do not know whether I am wrong if I say, "it is all a question of logging on to the Cosmic Server" (as an well-experienced friend of mine put it). It is a scientific approach to a Divine subject and therefore there are bound to be multiple views and to arrive at a consensus is almost next to impossible.

I am aware that I am slightly outside the issue on hand.

I recall that you had sought the views of members earlier to slightly de-moderate the postings to avoid delay in messages appearing in the Forum and therefore in that context I am tempted to present a few points for your kind perusal.

Regards,

K Jagadish

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

Selvam ji,

 

Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other members.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote: Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its isNOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members and My Respected Veterans in this field.I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of allmembers in a much more organised way for identification from therelevel of a Devine Subject in Astrology. I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to saythe word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if thedirection of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some extent2) Intermidiate Level 3)Advance Level4)Super Advance LevelNote;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy, Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next messagehow Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn RegardsP.R.SELVAM

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Mukesh,

 

Thank you for subscribing to my views.

 

Regards,

 

K JagadishMukesh <mukeshgupta wrote:

 

Dear Jagadish,

 

I fully agree with your views

 

Mukesh

 

-

Jagadish K

Saturday, August 20, 2005 11:43 PM

Re: To:Moderator,Suggestion for Group List Members Clasification ,NOT an ADVISE

 

 

Dear Mr.Punit Pandey,

My humble feeling is as follows:

 

There should be no classification Basically it should be a level playing field The power of knowledge can be displayed by taking the group together and not by division of the group Creation of self-made or dictated hierarchial levels will destroy the moral fabric of basic humility and thus may inflate one’s own ego. MAN DIES FIRST, EGO DIES NEXT! Free flow / exchange of information should be encouraged Members should never offend fellow members Comments should be on the subject, but not on the author of the message Language should be polite, under all circumstances Highest standard of moral turpitude should be observed while presenting one’s views Factual errors or misunderstanding of points in the books should be addressed politely No one need assume a Teacher’s role and on the other hand help others understand better Difference of opinion on any given subject can be justified / explained by quoting a book or can even quote their personal exposure to charts (can give birth details) thereby giving participating members to cast a chart for case study There is bound to be some confusion about different routes to reach the same destination to predict, because of the inherent nature of the subject Members can be suggested to type on Note Pad or so, off-line, read once or twice before posting, instead of replying immediately. This could possibly bring in higher degree of accountability apart from presenting their views better.

All though the System and approach and analysis are quite scientific, perhaps the outcome has to be generally divine. I do not know whether I am wrong if I say, "it is all a question of logging on to the Cosmic Server" (as an well-experienced friend of mine put it). It is a scientific approach to a Divine subject and therefore there are bound to be multiple views and to arrive at a consensus is almost next to impossible.

I am aware that I am slightly outside the issue on hand.

I recall that you had sought the views of members earlier to slightly de-moderate the postings to avoid delay in messages appearing in the Forum and therefore in that context I am tempted to present a few points for your kind perusal.

Regards,

K Jagadish

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

Selvam ji,

 

Your suggestions are most welcome. Let us wait for suggestions from other members.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 8/19/05, P.R.Selvam <selvam_prs wrote: Dear Sir, I would like to Suggest upon a Humble Request only, its isNOT an advise but an OPINION only, may be considered by our Members and My Respected Veterans in this field.I think there is a need for clasification and the catergory of allmembers in a much more organised way for identification from therelevel of a Devine Subject in Astrology. I think that in a 3 years time from now there MAY be more than 300group list members in the net using Guruji KSK as a tool(sorry to saythe word as a tool)It is Not wrong to have many groups,But if thedirection of KSK to be Explored twoards R & D its welcome,how about if it is manuplated for vareioues reasons it may not be healthy.Stated below are the suggestion as follow.........1) Beginers (a) Very New (b) understand astrology to some

extent2) Intermidiate Level 3)Advance Level4)Super Advance LevelNote;SAL the person should be able to,Meditate like Telepathy, Matters related to Telepathy i shall post on my next messagehow Guruji KSK did. BOOK The Star at Dawn RegardsP.R.SELVAM