Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Dear Members, Today I wrote a program to validate a thought that had crossed my mind sometime ago. Instead of selecting " current " Ruling Planets is it correct to select RPs corresponding to a different time point? An application of this idea, if it worked, is to check the correctness of birth times of AA-charts that TW gave us sometime ago. A limitation Kanak faced was that he could check only a couple of charts in a day by applying RPs. I thought I could write a program to do this automatically, but there was a catch. My program would complete the whole analysis in less than a minute, making RPs ineffective (because nothing would have changed in that shor time span). So to simulate what Kanak did, I wanted to generate random dates and compute RPs on those dates - mimicking a human astrologer doing the checking over several years. Clearly the assumption behind the experiment was that the " simulated " RPs were as good as " real " RPs. How to validate this assumption? So before writing the program to check birth times, I wrote a program to check the validity of this assumption. The details are given in the file that I have uploaded to the files section. I think the result will surprise many. Let me know what you think. Regards, Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, I am totaly disagree with you. Meaning of RP is : The planet rule at the time of judgement. And you want to do this work in 5 second.how it will possible? You want to do random dates in fact date will not at the time of judgement and you want result who can you gat real fact? in my opinion this is not wise step.You cant do everything by software. regards kanak>"Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga> > > Real Vs. Simulated Ruling Planets>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:12:38 -0000>>Dear Members,>Today I wrote a program to validate a thought that had crossed my mind>sometime ago. Instead of selecting "current" Ruling Planets is it>correct to select RPs corresponding to a different time point? An>application of this idea, if it worked, is to check the correctness of>birth times of AA-charts that TW gave us sometime ago. A limitation>Kanak faced was that he could check only a couple of charts in a day>by applying RPs. I thought I could write a program to do this>automatically, but there was a catch. My program would complete the>whole analysis in less than a minute, making RPs ineffective (because>nothing would have changed in that shor time span). So to simulate>what Kanak did, I wanted to generate random dates and compute RPs on>those dates - mimicking a human astrologer doing the checking over>several years. Clearly the assumption behind the experiment was that>the "simulated" RPs were as good as "real" RPs. How to validate this>assumption? So before writing the program to check birth times, I>wrote a program to check the validity of this assumption. The details>are given in the file that I have uploaded to the files section.>>I think the result will surprise many. Let me know what you think.>>Regards,>Rangarajan>> With MSN Spaces email straight to your blog. Upload jokes, photos and more. It's free! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Dear Kanak, Thanks for your comments. I understand and agree that one can't do everything through software, but I would like to know the limits and stretch them if possible. I believe without experimenting we will never know. Regards, Rangarajan , " Kanak Bosmia " <kanbosastro@h...> wrote: > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Dear Mr. Rangarajan, The idea of using RPs for mass checking of birth times does not appear to be a blessed idea. For want of any good word I have used the word blessed. If one thinks disspassionately what is the logic for choosing any random moment for checking. Ther is no logic at all. It is just a belief that it would work. Once, I had a puzzling experience. On three consecutive nights someone asked a querry at the same time. All the three days I had the same Prashna Kundali!!!. At that time I was still not using KP. The point is that when we do things repeatedly some unknown blessing rom the mother nature would be missing I guess. For some peculiar reason, when I used horary of KP also all the time my predictions went wrong about the irregular servant maid. The questions were whether she would come to work and when? some how I have got no grip on Horary. Move the asc, move moon, etc, whatever trials-- never worked. Udupa Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Members,Today I wrote a program to validate a thought that had crossed my mindsometime ago. Instead of selecting "current" Ruling Planets is itcorrect to select RPs corresponding to a different time point? Anapplication of this idea, if it worked, is to check the correctness ofbirth times of AA-charts that TW gave us sometime ago. A limitationKanak faced was that he could check only a couple of charts in a dayby applying RPs. I thought I could write a program to do thisautomatically, but there was a catch. My program would complete thewhole analysis in less than a minute, making RPs ineffective (becausenothing would have changed in that shor time span). So to simulatewhat Kanak did, I wanted to generate random dates and compute RPs onthose dates - mimicking a human astrologer doing the checking overseveral years. Clearly the assumption behind the experiment was thatthe "simulated" RPs were as good as "real" RPs. How to validate thisassumption? So before writing the program to check birth times, Iwrote a program to check the validity of this assumption. The detailsare given in the file that I have uploaded to the files section.I think the result will surprise many. Let me know what you think.Regards,Rangarajan Discover Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing more. Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Dear Kanak, I am in total agreement with you...Research should be meaningful...but,I daresay,research with "simulated RPs" a concept which has NO PLACE in K.P., surely would yield NO meaningful results... Research should be not be done just "for the sake of doing research",and because of one's aquisition of expertise in IT...or handling and creating any new software... Befire designing or taking up a "project" for research,a lot of thought should go into it...as we all know...and the objective should be very clear...and whether the design will yield any useful results MUST be determined before hand... With regards, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Kanak Bosmia <kanbosastro wrote: Dear Rangarajan, I am totaly disagree with you. Meaning of RP is : The planet rule at the time of judgement. And you want to do this work in 5 second.how it will possible? You want to do random dates in fact date will not at the time of judgement and you want result who can you gat real fact? in my opinion this is not wise step.You cant do everything by software. regards kanak>"Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga> > > Real Vs. Simulated Ruling Planets>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:12:38 -0000>>Dear Members,>Today I wrote a program to validate a thought that had crossed my mind>sometime ago. Instead of selecting "current" Ruling Planets is it>correct to select RPs corresponding to a different time point? An>application of this idea, if it worked, is to check the correctness of>birth times of AA-charts that TW gave us sometime ago. A limitation>Kanak faced was that he could check only a couple of charts in a day>by applying RPs. I thought I could write a program to do this>automatically, but there was a catch. My program would complete the>whole analysis in less than a minute, making RPs ineffective (because>nothing would have changed in that shor time span). So to simulate>what Kanak did, I wanted to generate random dates and compute RPs on>those dates - mimicking a human astrologer doing the checking over>several years. Clearly the assumption behind the experiment was that>the "simulated" RPs were as good as "real" RPs. How to validate this>assumption? So before writing the program to check birth times, I>wrote a program to check the validity of this assumption. The details>are given in the file that I have uploaded to the files section.>>I think the result will surprise many. Let me know what you think.>>Regards,>Rangarajan>> With MSN Spaces email straight to your blog. Upload jokes, photos and more. It's free! Too much spam in your inbox? Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE!http://in.mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Dear Rangarajan, I suggest that the aims & objectives of the research you want to undertake be please stated clearly...(to yourself,atleast). Next,what do you expect to gain,or prove by this research... What would be the benefits to the followers of K.P., which they could utilise in an easily practicable way...etc., should be all be stated (to yourself),and then weighed carefully before embarking on any research project... This is my humble suggestion, With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Kanak,Thanks for your comments. I understand and agree that one can't doeverything through software, but I would like to know the limits andstretch them if possible. I believe without experimenting we willnever know.Regards,Rangarajan , "Kanak Bosmia" <kanbosastro@h...>wrote:> How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends n family photos for FREE with Photos. http://in.photos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Dear mr Rangarajan I went thru your file on Real Vs Simulated Ruling Planets. This study just confirms my experience/ and full belief that Astrology is not mere Science, but something added to it. The rules are there, but in addittion to the study and application of the rules, you require a divine guidance, before you get the correct solution. I had written to you about My Ahmedabad Experience on Punarphoo. The other day very similar experience was there. Merc is sub lord of 7th. Rule says Multiple Marriage. With marriage punarphoo, the possibility of a broken love affair has to be considered. Then one has to check the life span of the Present Mate. Again check the Mangala Dosha. You may arrive at the correct answer, or with intutuion, you get the correct answer. I read in the Marathi Magazine on KP and 4 step method, a very striking article. A girl had come for consultaion of her Marriage. The astrologer, considered 2,7,11 house, and 4 step rule, and calculated fairly correct date of marriage. When he was awating the feedback, the father of the Girl met him and told him that on the date he had predicted, the girl met with an accident, and Died. Same 2,7,11 subs||| I had similar experince with my youger Brother. He was not well. He was also a student of KP. We sat together and studied the progress of his illness. The illness was to get worse, during a particular, period, and then improve. We even calculated the date when he would return home from the Hospital. All came correct to date. BUT NEXT DAY HE HAD A MASSIVE HEART ATTACK, WHILE SITTING IN AN EASY CHAIR, AND EXPIRED. One wonders, how He or Me could not forsee this event, although we had worked out the date of cure, and his discharge from the Hospital. Many other incidents, do suggest, that there is a Divine hand (force), guiding the devout astrologer. Real R.P. work only when there is a Real Urge on part of both the Querrist and the astrologer. In your simulated RPS, this urge is not there. Different Astrologers, tackling the same problem, may get different RPS. If the astrologers are running a good time, they will get correct indications. If this is done merely as a curiosity to test some theorey, the real urge will be missing. KPK has some where said " The astrologer may go wrong, but not the System " I hope this helps. Good Luck Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Rangarajan, I suggest that the aims & objectives of the research you want to undertake be please stated clearly...(to yourself,atleast). Next,what do you expect to gain,or prove by this research... What would be the benefits to the followers of K.P., which they could utilise in an easily practicable way...etc., should be all be stated (to yourself),and then weighed carefully before embarking on any research project... This is my humble suggestion, With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK !Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Kanak,Thanks for your comments. I understand and agree that one can't doeverything through software, but I would like to know the limits andstretch them if possible. I believe without experimenting we willnever know.Regards,Rangarajan , "Kanak Bosmia" <kanbosastro@h...>wrote:> How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends n family photos for FREE with Photos. http://in.photos. --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Discover Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing more. Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Dear Shri.Raichur, Thank you. Regards, Rangarajan , anant raichur <anant_1608> wrote: > Dear mr Rangarajan > > I went thru your file on Real Vs Simulated Ruling Planets. > > This study just confirms my experience/ and full belief that Astrology is not mere > > Science, but something added to it. The rules are there, but in addittion to the study and > > application of the rules, you require a divine guidance, before you get the correct solution. > > I had written to you about My Ahmedabad Experience on Punarphoo. The other day very > > similar experience was there. Merc is sub lord of 7th. Rule says Multiple Marriage. > > With marriage punarphoo, the possibility of a broken love affair has to be considered. Then > > one has to check the life span of the Present Mate. Again check the Mangala Dosha. > > You may arrive at the correct answer, or with intutuion, you get the correct answer. > > I read in the Marathi Magazine on KP and 4 step method, a very striking article. > > A girl had come for consultaion of her Marriage. The astrologer, considered 2,7,11 > > house, and 4 step rule, and calculated fairly correct date of marriage. > > When he was awating the feedback, the father of the Girl met him and told him that > > on the date he had predicted, the girl met with an accident, and Died. Same 2,7,11 subs||| > > I had similar experince with my youger Brother. He was not well. He was also a student > > of KP. We sat together and studied the progress of his illness. The illness was to get > > worse, during a particular, period, and then improve. We even calculated the date when he > > would return home from the Hospital. All came correct to date. BUT NEXT DAY HE HAD A > > MASSIVE HEART ATTACK, WHILE SITTING IN AN EASY CHAIR, AND EXPIRED. > > One wonders, how He or Me could not forsee this event, although we had worked out the > > date of cure, and his discharge from the Hospital. > > Many other incidents, do suggest, that there is a Divine hand (force), guiding the devout > > astrologer. Real R.P. work only when there is a Real Urge on part of both the Querrist and > > the astrologer. > > In your simulated RPS, this urge is not there. > > Different Astrologers, tackling the same problem, may get different RPS. If the astrologers are > > running a good time, they will get correct indications. If this is done merely as a curiosity to > > test some theorey, the real urge will be missing. > > KPK has some where said " The astrologer may go wrong, but not the System " > > I hope this helps. > > Good Luck > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.