RP Method checking with falsy(-10Mnt.from aa rated data) data

[Guest guest]

Dear Raichur ji,Randarajan ji, and Tin Win ji,

 

yesterday i was finished RP checking with -10Mnt. data and i hope i will finish my work with +10Mnt. Data withn 2-3 days.

 

I found that 80% data rejected so my opinion is very clear that this rules work very properly.

 

waiting for your reply

 

best regards

 

kanak Find just what you're after with the new, more precise MSN Search - try it now!

[Guest guest]

Dear Kanak,

Thanks for putting in so much effort.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

, " Kanak Bosmia " <kanbosastro@h...>

wrote:

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Kanak,

 

 

Requoting a valuable statement of our revered Guruji,

 

" My friends, we have come up to this- you should continue the

research and you may reach to further truth " (K.P. Year Book, 1996,

p 63, thanks to Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u ),

 

congratulations for your effort which shows the RPs Rule appears

reliable by indicating a sensitivity (reversing the results for

original AAs) of -10 min deviation in 17 out of 20 AA data, except

No. 3, 4 & 13, i.e. 85% (for No. 5 it's reversed from " not correct "

to " correct " ). At the same time generally AAs also seem reliable.

 

Some event data for No. 3 AA, 1955 married; 1965/1989/Sept 1990 bad

accident; for No. 13 AA, Dec 17, 1952 married; May 19, 1974 (until

May 10, 1981) became President of France; April 1981 lost

presidential election.

 

Thanks and regards,

 

tw

 

 

, " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy "

<ranga@m...> wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

> Thanks for putting in so much effort.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

> , " Kanak Bosmia "

<kanbosastro@h...>

> wrote:

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Kanak,

 

Sorry to make a correction No.4 AA (A J Foyt) not No.3 AA (Hedon

Blount) for which event data not available.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

, " tw853 " <tw853> wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

>

>

> Requoting a valuable statement of our revered Guruji,

>

> " My friends, we have come up to this- you should continue the

> research and you may reach to further truth " (K.P. Year Book,

1996,

> p 63, thanks to Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u@a...> ),

>

> congratulations for your effort which shows the RPs Rule appears

> reliable by indicating a sensitivity (reversing the results for

> original AAs) of -10 min deviation in 17 out of 20 AA data, except

> No. 3, 4 & 13, i.e. 85% (for No. 5 it's reversed from " not

correct "

> to " correct " ). At the same time generally AAs also seem reliable.

>

> Some event data for No. 3 AA, 1955 married; 1965/1989/Sept 1990

bad

> accident; for No. 13 AA, Dec 17, 1952 married; May 19, 1974 (until

> May 10, 1981) became President of France; April 1981 lost

> presidential election.

>

> Thanks and regards,

>

> tw

>

>

> , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy "

> <ranga@m...> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> > Thanks for putting in so much effort.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Rangarajan

> >

> > , " Kanak Bosmia "

> <kanbosastro@h...>

> > wrote:

> > >

[Guest guest]

dear tw

what is AA rated data - can you brief ?

sambasiva raotw853 <tw853 wrote:

Dear Kanak,Requoting a valuable statement of our revered Guruji, "My friends, we have come up to this- you should continue the research and you may reach to further truth" (K.P. Year Book, 1996, p 63, thanks to Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u ),congratulations for your effort which shows the RPs Rule appears reliable by indicating a sensitivity (reversing the results for original AAs) of -10 min deviation in 17 out of 20 AA data, except No. 3, 4 & 13, i.e. 85% (for No. 5 it's reversed from "not correct" to "correct"). At the same time generally AAs also seem reliable.Some event data for No. 3 AA, 1955 married; 1965/1989/Sept 1990 bad accident; for No. 13 AA, Dec 17, 1952 married; May 19, 1974 (until May 10, 1981) became President of France; April 1981 lost presidential

election. Thanks and regards,tw , "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" <ranga@m...> wrote:> Dear Kanak,> Thanks for putting in so much effort.> > Regards,> Rangarajan> > , "Kanak Bosmia" <kanbosastro@h...> > wrote:> >

Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

[Guest guest]

Dear Sambasiva Rao,

 

References from the astrodatabank below.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

Accuracy and Rodden Ratings

 

AA, A, and B data are the only data that should be used in

astrological studies. Data rated " AA " (from birth certificate or

birth record) are the most accurate obtainable. Data rated " A " (from

memory) are usually accurate, but there are exceptions. Politicians

and entertainers are notorious for giving misleading birth dates and

times, except when consulting their astrologer. " B " data (from

biographies) are similarly accurate because authors who give times

are likely to have obtained the data from the subject, the subject's

immediate family, or from a birth record.

 

AA

Accurate data as recorded by the family or state. This includes BC

(birth certificate), and BR (birth record), that which is not an

official document but a quote of the birth record from the Registrar

or Bureau of Records, the baptismal certificate, family Bible, or

baby book. These data reflect the best available accuracy.

 

 

 

 

, rao chitturu <csr162002>

wrote:

> dear tw

> what is AA rated data - can you brief ?

> sambasiva rao

>

> tw853 <tw853> wrote:

> Dear Kanak,

>

>

> Requoting a valuable statement of our revered Guruji,

>

> " My friends, we have come up to this- you should continue the

> research and you may reach to further truth " (K.P. Year Book,

1996,

> p 63, thanks to Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u@a...> ),

>

> congratulations for your effort which shows the RPs Rule appears

> reliable by indicating a sensitivity (reversing the results for

> original AAs) of -10 min deviation in 17 out of 20 AA data, except

> No. 3, 4 & 13, i.e. 85% (for No. 5 it's reversed from " not

correct "

> to " correct " ). At the same time generally AAs also seem reliable.

>

> Some event data for No. 3 AA, 1955 married; 1965/1989/Sept 1990

bad

> accident; for No. 13 AA, Dec 17, 1952 married; May 19, 1974 (until

> May 10, 1981) became President of France; April 1981 lost

> presidential election.

>

> Thanks and regards,

>

> tw

>

>

> , " Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy "

> <ranga@m...> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak,

> > Thanks for putting in so much effort.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Rangarajan

> >

> > , " Kanak Bosmia "

> <kanbosastro@h...>

> > wrote:

> >

>

[Guest guest]

dear tw

thanks for the clarifications.

sambasiva rao

tw853 <tw853 wrote:

Dear Sambasiva Rao,References from the astrodatabank below.Regards,twAccuracy and Rodden RatingsAA, A, and B data are the only data that should be used in astrological studies. Data rated "AA" (from birth certificate or birth record) are the most accurate obtainable. Data rated "A" (from memory) are usually accurate, but there are exceptions. Politicians and entertainers are notorious for giving misleading birth dates and times, except when consulting their astrologer. "B" data (from biographies) are similarly accurate because authors who give times are likely to have obtained the data from the subject, the subject's immediate family, or from a birth record.AAAccurate data as recorded by the family or state. This includes BC (birth certificate), and BR (birth record), that which is not an

official document but a quote of the birth record from the Registrar or Bureau of Records, the baptismal certificate, family Bible, or baby book. These data reflect the best available accuracy. , rao chitturu <csr162002> wrote:> dear tw> what is AA rated data - can you brief ?> sambasiva rao> > tw853 <tw853> wrote:> Dear Kanak,> > > Requoting a valuable statement of our revered Guruji, > > "My friends, we have come up to this- you should continue the > research and you may reach to further truth" (K.P. Year Book, 1996, > p 63, thanks to Hasmukhrai Mehta <astroclinic4u@a...> ),> > congratulations for your effort which shows the RPs Rule appears > reliable by indicating a sensitivity (reversing the results for > original AAs) of -10 min deviation in 17 out of 20 AA

data, except > No. 3, 4 & 13, i.e. 85% (for No. 5 it's reversed from "not correct" > to "correct"). At the same time generally AAs also seem reliable.> > Some event data for No. 3 AA, 1955 married; 1965/1989/Sept 1990 bad > accident; for No. 13 AA, Dec 17, 1952 married; May 19, 1974 (until > May 10, 1981) became President of France; April 1981 lost > presidential election. > > Thanks and regards,> > tw> > > , "Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy" > <ranga@m...> wrote:> > Dear Kanak,> > Thanks for putting in so much effort.> > > > Regards,> > Rangarajan> > > > , "Kanak Bosmia" > <kanbosastro@h...> > > wrote:> > >> > > > > >

>