Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

AA rtaed data check by RP

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Shri Raichur ji , Ranagarajan ji and Tin Win ji,

 

I have uplod file for 20 AA rated data cehck by Rp method and found 75% correct and 25% wrong result. this time i am ceck only AA rated data.

 

If any one found any mistake please inform me.

 

regards

 

kanak With MSN Spaces email straight to your blog. Upload jokes, photos and more. It's free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Kanak ji,

 

1. Congratulations for a great job.

 

2. 5 (no. 5, 8,12, 14 & 20) out of 20 AA TOBs are rejected accepted

as incorrect, i.e. 25% rejection rate. and 75% acceptance rate. By

taking only AA TOBs, what do the results mean?

 

a) If only it's assumed that AA TOBs are correct, the RP rule is

reliable by 75%.

 

b) If it's only assumed that the RP Rule is correct, 75% of AA TOBs

are correct and 25% incorrect.

 

3. It's inconclusive without an assumption. As mentioned before, it

will be interseting to see:

 

a) whether the Rule gives a consistent results by doing second and

third time at a different day and time;

 

b) how the Rule responds to widening of time deviation from AA TOBs,

e.g. the Rule is not sensative to 10 min time deviation in 40% of

the first 10 AA TOBs as shown in the first test.

 

Thanks and regards,

 

tw

 

 

, " Kanak Bosmia " <kanbosastro@h...>

wrote:

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Tin Win ji,

Now i will start with -10 Mnt data to find out what result come and aftre this i am start with + 10 Mnt data. so finaly we found somer healthi result.

What You think?

regards

kanak

>"tw853" <tw853> > > Re: AA rtaed data check by RP>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:46:52 -0000>>Dear Kanak ji,>>1. Congratulations for a great job.>>2. 5 (no. 5, 8,12, 14 & 20) out of 20 AA TOBs are rejected accepted>as incorrect, i.e. 25% rejection rate. and 75% acceptance rate. By>taking only AA TOBs, what do the results mean?>>a) If only it's assumed that AA TOBs are correct, the RP rule is>reliable by 75%.>>b) If it's only assumed that the RP Rule is correct, 75% of AA TOBs>are correct and 25% incorrect.>>3. It's inconclusive without an assumption. As mentioned before, it>will be interseting to see:>>a) whether the Rule gives a consistent results by doing second and>third time at a different day and time;>>b) how the Rule responds to widening of time deviation from AA TOBs,>e.g. the Rule is not sensative to 10 min time deviation in 40% of>the first 10 AA TOBs as shown in the first test.>>Thanks and regards,>>tw>>> , "Kanak Bosmia" <kanbosastro@h...>>wrote:> >>> Get the NEW version of MSN Messenger - it's FREE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Kanak ji,

 

Thanks. And only then we can see how consistent is the Rule and how

it's sensative to the time deviation.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

 

, " Kanak Bosmia " <kanbosastro@h...>

wrote:

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Kanak,

 

I too send my congratulations. Are you intending doing at

least one 'control' for each chart ie say 10 minutes on either

side of birth time, in order to see whether this is a normal

statistical result? Unlike tw I believe that a 10 minute

difference is practical. When we are rectifying an observed or

reported birth time we seldom have to move outside of 10 minutes.

 

 

An even more telling result might be obtained if you ran the

5 'failed' results again (for the birth time) to see whether you

get the same as the original results.

 

 

Ron Gaunt

 

 

 

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:46:52 -0000, you wrote:

 

>Dear Kanak ji,

>

>1. Congratulations for a great job.

>

>2. 5 (no. 5, 8,12, 14 & 20) out of 20 AA TOBs are rejected accepted

>as incorrect, i.e. 25% rejection rate. and 75% acceptance rate. By

>taking only AA TOBs, what do the results mean?

>

>a) If only it's assumed that AA TOBs are correct, the RP rule is

>reliable by 75%.

>

>b) If it's only assumed that the RP Rule is correct, 75% of AA TOBs

>are correct and 25% incorrect.

>

>3. It's inconclusive without an assumption. As mentioned before, it

>will be interseting to see:

>

>a) whether the Rule gives a consistent results by doing second and

>third time at a different day and time;

>

>b) how the Rule responds to widening of time deviation from AA TOBs,

>e.g. the Rule is not sensative to 10 min time deviation in 40% of

>the first 10 AA TOBs as shown in the first test.

>

>Thanks and regards,

>

>tw

>

>

> , " Kanak Bosmia " <kanbosastro@h...>

>wrote:

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...