Analysis of Anant Topkar Birth Rectification Technique

[Guest guest]

Dear Members,

I have uploaded a file containing the results of my programmatic

analysis of Shri.Anant Topkar technique of birth rectification as

explained by Shri.Raichur in his posting # 4701.

 

This is for your kind study and comments.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

[Guest guest]

Dear Rangarajan

You have done a great job. However, the summary does not give a correct picture

 

If you can classify the results in categories. 1.Not correctable. 2. No

correction

 

reqd. 3. Correction upto 1min. 4.correction upto 2 mts. 5 correction upto 3 mts.

 

correction beyond 3 minutes.

 

Such a classification would lead to a further study, what is the effect if BT is

 

say CORRECT within +/- 3 mts. Can we accept such a range, instead of Zero

deviation

 

Sorry to ask you to do this, but you can just slightly change your prog. and

give the

 

results. I feel this will be a more productive study.

 

good luck

 

 

--- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

 

> Dear Members,

> I have uploaded a file containing the results of my programmatic

> analysis of Shri.Anant Topkar technique of birth rectification as

> explained by Shri.Raichur in his posting # 4701.

>

> This is for your kind study and comments.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri.Raichur,

I agree that such an classification might be useful. However, please

recall that for ASC sublord/MOON starlord connection test and CKV

test we were only checking if the given time " passed " or " failed "

the test. We did not rectify the given time and then perform the

classification you are suggesting. The current output from the

program is on the same level as the other two cases.

 

However, it is easy for me to provide the data you require and I

will definitely do it.

 

Regards,

Rangarajan

 

, anant raichur <anant_1608>

wrote:

> Dear Rangarajan

> You have done a great job. However, the summary does not give a

correct picture

>

> If you can classify the results in categories. 1.Not correctable.

2. No correction

>

> reqd. 3. Correction upto 1min. 4.correction upto 2 mts. 5

correction upto 3 mts.

>

> correction beyond 3 minutes.

>

> Such a classification would lead to a further study, what is the

effect if BT is

>

> say CORRECT within +/- 3 mts. Can we accept such a range, instead

of Zero deviation

>

> Sorry to ask you to do this, but you can just slightly change your

prog. and give the

>

> results. I feel this will be a more productive study.

>

> good luck

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Rangarajan

 

Thank you. In the ASC-sublord, Moon Star Lord connection, we were Testing

 

a categorical statement that These are connected, and if not the BT should be

 

corrected. What surprised me that the Ratio remained almsot unaffected even when

 

the time was changed by 10minutes.

 

Please let me know, IF the 1st rule of SEX is satisfied in all the 300 cases or

not.

 

Further correction depends on this. Here we are limiting to correction of 3

 

minutes only. I believe the stumbling Block is the 3 step. Subsub Lord's

Signstar

 

indicating/confirming the Sex in 1st step.

 

good luck

 

 

--- Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote:

 

> Dear Shri.Raichur,

> I agree that such an classification might be useful. However, please

> recall that for ASC sublord/MOON starlord connection test and CKV

> test we were only checking if the given time " passed " or " failed "

> the test. We did not rectify the given time and then perform the

> classification you are suggesting. The current output from the

> program is on the same level as the other two cases.

>

> However, it is easy for me to provide the data you require and I

> will definitely do it.

>

> Regards,

> Rangarajan

>

> , anant raichur <anant_1608>

> wrote:

> > Dear Rangarajan

> > You have done a great job. However, the summary does not give a

> correct picture

> >

> > If you can classify the results in categories. 1.Not correctable.

> 2. No correction

> >

> > reqd. 3. Correction upto 1min. 4.correction upto 2 mts. 5

> correction upto 3 mts.

> >

> > correction beyond 3 minutes.

> >

> > Such a classification would lead to a further study, what is the

> effect if BT is

> >

> > say CORRECT within +/- 3 mts. Can we accept such a range, instead

> of Zero deviation

> >

> > Sorry to ask you to do this, but you can just slightly change your

> prog. and give the

> >

> > results. I feel this will be a more productive study.

> >

> > good luck

> >

>