Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle. May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of? Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle. May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of? Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde Yes, you might be correct. In the book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane(Mumbai) named as "Krishnamurti Jyotish Phaladesh Khand", he has written that even though KP theory states that Retro. planets should *Not* be considered in RP, one should even take retro. planets in RP. But, this means, that KP "theory" indicates "Removal" but experience vary from this. Secondly, Mr. Shahasane has stated that KP theory also suggests to "Remove" the planets from RP which are in Retro. planet's Nakshatra. Do many astrologers practice this rule? You can throw more light on this. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde Yes, you might be correct. In the book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane(Mumbai) named as "Krishnamurti Jyotish Phaladesh Khand", he has written that even though KP theory states that Retro. planets should *Not* be considered in RP, one should even take retro. planets in RP. But, this means, that KP "theory" indicates "Removal" but experience vary from this. Secondly, Mr. Shahasane has stated that KP theory also suggests to "Remove" the planets from RP which are in Retro. planet's Nakshatra. Do many astrologers practice this rule? You can throw more light on this. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Raichur ji, A very strict opinion. The rasi chart is useful in KP too. Especially if you see North Indian chart, you require Rasi chart to know the Hindu aspects. Regards, Punit Pandey On 5/4/05, anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add " Ketu " to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since " Rahu " is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Mr. Anant Do we "Remove" the planets from RP, which start lord's are Retro.?? Regards Abhay anant raichur wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombay anant_1608raichuranantUSE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY tel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay, Believe me, considering the retro planets as valid RPs is original KP concept -theory given by Guruji KSK himself. Standard is to omit the only planets in the constellation of retro planets. Further, I would request you to refer the book, "HORARY ASTROLOGY" krishnamurti padhdhati ADVANCED STELLAR SYSTEM. This book was originally written by the father and propagator of KP system of Astrology, Shri K.S.Krishnamurti. The book I have got has undergone eighth edition and printed in the year 1999. In this book, in page no.123, this is unambiguously explained. Now I am a lot curious to know the sources, which has influenced you a large extent to get under wrong impression! Yes, KP principle and my experience both are in concurrence, as far as rejecting planet(s) placed in the constellation of retro planet from the active RPs list is concerned. I also suggest to experiment with rejecting Ketu & Rahu, (only if they cruces in as substitute/additional RPs) from RPs, if those are happens to be in the sub of Retro planets. You can exercise this with caution. Many KP astrologers follow above rules and yet get very good rate of success. By experience you would realise that, when ever confusion shrouds you, it would be better to leave analysing horary chart at that moment of time and only to take it up later when and only urge surfaces back. Efforts put under compulsion and involuntary often meets with wrong results. Clarity of thoughts should be prevailing. Hence I am of the firm opinion that, astrologers may go wrong repeatedly owing to many many reasons but not astrology principles! Best of luck, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:54 PM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde Yes, you might be correct. In the book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane(Mumbai) named as "Krishnamurti Jyotish Phaladesh Khand", he has written that even though KP theory states that Retro. planets should *Not* be considered in RP, one should even take retro. planets in RP. But, this means, that KP "theory" indicates "Removal" but experience vary from this. Secondly, Mr. Shahasane has stated that KP theory also suggests to "Remove" the planets from RP which are in Retro. planet's Nakshatra. Do many astrologers practice this rule? You can throw more light on this. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay, For analysis of Prashna Kundali, cusp chart is quite essential lest we go betrayed as would not be in a position to decide house position of planets properly. Cusp positions just can be written down in the traditional chart. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:30 PM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Raichur ji, A very strict opinion. The rasi chart is useful in KP too. Especially if you see North Indian chart, you require Rasi chart to know the Hindu aspects. Regards, Punit Pandey On 5/4/05, anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add " Ketu " to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since " Rahu " is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Mr. Anant Do we "Remove" the planets from RP, which start lord's are Retro.?? Regards Abhay anant raichur wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombay anant_1608raichuranantUSE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY tel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay, Believe me, considering the retro planets as valid RPs is original KP concept -theory given by Guruji KSK himself. Standard is to omit the only planets in the constellation of retro planets. Further, I would request you to refer the book, "HORARY ASTROLOGY" krishnamurti padhdhati ADVANCED STELLAR SYSTEM. This book was originally written by the father and propagator of KP system of Astrology, Shri K.S.Krishnamurti. The book I have got has undergone eighth edition and printed in the year 1999. In this book, in page no.123, this is unambiguously explained. Now I am a lot curious to know the sources, which has influenced you a large extent to get under wrong impression! Yes, KP principle and my experience both are in concurrence, as far as rejecting planet(s) placed in the constellation of retro planet from the active RPs list is concerned. I also suggest to experiment with rejecting Ketu & Rahu, (only if they cruces in as substitute/additional RPs) from RPs, if those are happens to be in the sub of Retro planets. You can exercise this with caution. Many KP astrologers follow above rules and yet get very good rate of success. By experience you would realise that, when ever confusion shrouds you, it would be better to leave analysing horary chart at that moment of time and only to take it up later when and only urge surfaces back. Efforts put under compulsion and involuntary often meets with wrong results. Clarity of thoughts should be prevailing. Hence I am of the firm opinion that, astrologers may go wrong repeatedly owing to many many reasons but not astrology principles! Best of luck, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:54 PM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde Yes, you might be correct. In the book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane(Mumbai) named as "Krishnamurti Jyotish Phaladesh Khand", he has written that even though KP theory states that Retro. planets should *Not* be considered in RP, one should even take retro. planets in RP. But, this means, that KP "theory" indicates "Removal" but experience vary from this. Secondly, Mr. Shahasane has stated that KP theory also suggests to "Remove" the planets from RP which are in Retro. planet's Nakshatra. Do many astrologers practice this rule? You can throw more light on this. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Dear Abhay, For analysis of Prashna Kundali, cusp chart is quite essential lest we go betrayed as would not be in a position to decide house position of planets properly. Cusp positions just can be written down in the traditional chart. Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:30 PM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 dear punit you can make out the Hindoo aspects from the KP chart also, however, it is easier with the North Traditional or lagna chart. Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: Raichur ji, A very strict opinion. The rasi chart is useful in KP too. Especially if you see North Indian chart, you require Rasi chart to know the Hindu aspects. Regards, Punit Pandey On 5/4/05, anant raichur <anant_1608 wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Dear Abhey It would be proper to remove the planets which are situated in stars of a Retrograde planet as it would not give results. Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Anant Do we "Remove" the planets from RP, which start lord's are Retro.?? Regards Abhay anant raichur wrote: Dear Abhay If you are a KP student, the only valid Kundali is the Cusp Kundali , and not the traditional Kundali. Traditional Kundali is generated for PUBLIC CONSUMPTION by Professional astrologers. When you charge a fee, the client expects some charts, wether he understands them or not. So you print thesee Traditional Lagna, Rasi, Navamasa Kundalis. good luck Abhay Godse <abhaygodse wrote: Dear Mr. Hegde Thirdly, In case of ''Prashna Kundali'', Do we need to take Cusp chart or even simple lagna kundali will do? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay --------- A.R.Raichur bombay anant_1608raichuranantUSE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLY tel: 022-2506 2609 --------- --------- A.R.Raichur bombayanant_1608 raichuranant USE ONE OF THESE ADDRESS ES ONLYtel: 022-2506 2609 --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Dear Mr. Hegde I got the reference from the Book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane, he has clearly stated that KP theory instructs to Remove Retro. Planets + the planets in start of retro from planets from RP. But....He has also stated that the experience vary from this theory...Retro. planets should NOT be removed from RP. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay, Believe me, considering the retro planets as valid RPs is original KP concept -theory given by Guruji KSK himself. Standard is to omit the only planets in the constellation of retro planets. Further, I would request you to refer the book, "HORARY ASTROLOGY" krishnamurti padhdhati ADVANCED STELLAR SYSTEM. This book was originally written by the father and propagator of KP system of Astrology, Shri K.S.Krishnamurti. The book I have got has undergone eighth edition and printed in the year 1999. In this book, in page no.123, this is unambiguously explained. Now I am a lot curious to know the sources, which has influenced you a large extent to get under wrong impression! Yes, KP principle and my experience both are in concurrence, as far as rejecting planet(s) placed in the constellation of retro planet from the active RPs list is concerned. I also suggest to experiment with rejecting Ketu & Rahu, (only if they cruces in as substitute/additional RPs) from RPs, if those are happens to be in the sub of Retro planets. You can exercise this with caution. Many KP astrologers follow above rules and yet get very good rate of success. By experience you would realise that, when ever confusion shrouds you, it would be better to leave analysing horary chart at that moment of time and only to take it up later when and only urge surfaces back. Efforts put under compulsion and involuntary often meets with wrong results. Clarity of thoughts should be prevailing. Hence I am of the firm opinion that, astrologers may go wrong repeatedly owing to many many reasons but not astrology principles! Best of luck, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:54 PM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde Yes, you might be correct. In the book by Mr. Suresh Shahasane(Mumbai) named as "Krishnamurti Jyotish Phaladesh Khand", he has written that even though KP theory states that Retro. planets should *Not* be considered in RP, one should even take retro. planets in RP. But, this means, that KP "theory" indicates "Removal" but experience vary from this. Secondly, Mr. Shahasane has stated that KP theory also suggests to "Remove" the planets from RP which are in Retro. planet's Nakshatra. Do many astrologers practice this rule? You can throw more light on this. Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: Dear Abhay Namaste, As far as my humble knowledge is concerned, KP theory suggests to reject the planets in the RPs, which would be placed in the constellation of retro planets, but *not* retro planets it self. Well, let me add, I stand to what I had written in my last mail based on not only by my experience but also on what have been taught by masters of KP, as general principle.May I request to enlighten me on the advanced theory/understandings you are assertive of?Best wishes, Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM Re: Fw: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Mr. Hegde But...As per KP theory, Retro. planet should be removed from RP but, if Retro. planet comes as CSL, then, it will not give result till it is Retro. Your personal experience might vary, but, theory is i think the same as i have mentioned above. Is it not correct? Regards Abhay Anmohiey wrote: - Anmohiey Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:32 PMRe: Just a small query regarding RP Dear Abhay, Yes it is required to add Rahu in the list of RPs. If Jupiter is retro, simply it need not be taken out of the RPs list on account of that. Theory is that, it would not play an active roll in yielding desirable result. But let me add, still such Jupiter can give results, once it gives up retrogression. Best wishes,Mohan Hegde. - Abhay Godse Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:45 AM Just a small query regarding RP Dear Members I just have one small query regarding Ruling planets, if all can throw light on it i will be greatful. Suppose, The Ruling planets are, Mer. Jup.(Retro.) Venus Venus In this case, Since Ketu is in virgo(mer's sign), we will add "Ketu" to the ruling, now, since Jup. is retro. , we will Not consider Jup. in the Ruling. correct? Now, Since "Rahu" is in Jup's sign, Should we consider Rahu in the ruling or we shouldn't? Thanks in advance !! Regards Abhay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.